Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
3,958 results
0.20s
Appendix — St. Paul At Chase Corp. v. Manufacturers Life Insurance
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1971
Murphy, 180 Md. 423, 24 A. 2d 917 (1942); Dennis v. Baltimore Tran- sit Co., 189 Md. 610, 56-A. 2d 813 (1948); and Vancherie v. Siperly, 243 Md. 366, 221 A. 2d 356 (1966). … Behan, 110 U.S. 338, 4 S. Ct. 81, 28 L. Ed. 168.” Id. at 301-02. (i) First Sea The trial judge allowed $5.00 compensatory damages and $50,000 punitive damages.
404 U.S. 857Appendix — United States v. 564.54 Acres of Monroe and Pike County Land
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1979
U.S., 1923, 263 U.S. 78; US. v. Certain Lands, 3 Cir. 1957, 246 F. 2d 823; U.S. v. Certain Property in Borough of Manhattan, 2 Cir. 1968, 403 F. 2d 800; U.S. v. … A If there are unusual conditions, it would tend w * + * * [482] Roy Gulliford, Mr.
441 U.S. 506Appendix — Miller v. First Federal of Michigan
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1985
H 11, 1106 (Sept. 28, 1978); S.17, 423 (Oct. 6, 1978)). … United States, 369 U.S. 1, 11 (1969). Id, at 993-94.
474 U.S. 849Appendix — United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Steven Sholly
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1983
Bradford, 423 U.S. 147, 149 (1975). The issue in the present case is not simply whether the NRC will again purge the reactor building atmosphere without first giving notice and holding a hearing. … denied, 362 U.S. 929 (1960).
463 U.S. 1224Appendix — Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1970
Code, § 234-236; the Act of August 31, 1916, Chapter 426, 39 Stat. 673-674, 15 U.S. Code, § 251-256; the Act of May 21, 1928, Chapter 664, 45 Stat. 685-687, 15 U.S. … Merrill, U.S. Circuit Judge WALTER E. CRAIG Walter E. Craig, U.S. District Judge C. A. MUECKE C. A. Muecke, U.S.
397 U.S. 137Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1998
California (1975) 422 U.S. 806. … Mosley (1975) 423 U.S. 96.) However, Naddi’s initial response cannot be fairly construed as an invocation of his Fifth Amendment rights to remain silent.
525 U.S. 978Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1986
Thompson, supra, 390 U.S. at 731, 88 S.Ct. at 1325. … Consumers Union of U.S. Ine., U.S. . n. 30, 104 S.
476 U.S. 1182Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1996
Ex. 42; Cohen testimony Tr. pp. 482-86. "Double cross-overs," however, are point contiguities with a purpose. … Ex. 42, pp. 1-3; Cohen testimony, Tr. pp. 482-86.
517 U.S. 899Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2003
Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89, 107 S. Ct. 2254, 2261 (1987) (internal quotations and citation omitted). … Creighton, 483 U.S. 635, 646 n.6, 107 S.
540 U.S. 823Appendix — Dautremont v. County of Ventura
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1984
(In re Quinn (1973) 35 Cal.App.3d 473, 482 [110 Cal.Rptr. 881].) … (E.g., U.S. Dept. of Agriculture v. Moreno (1973) 413 U.S. 528, 538 [37 L.Ed.2d 782, 790, 93 S.Ct. 2821]; Rinaldi v. Yeager (1966) 384 U.S. 305, 309-310 D'Amico v.
465 U.S. 1015Appendix — Diestel v. Hines (No. 07-1236)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2007
West, 505 U.S. 277, 296 (1992) (citing Jackson, 443 U.S. at 319). … McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 67-68 (1991) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 2241; Rose v. Hodges, 423 U.S. 19, 21 (1995) (per curium)).
Appendix — Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1991
Plumer, 380 U.S. 460 (1965). … Tryforos, 423 U.S. 1091 (1976), the court considered a fee award in a shareholder’s derivative action under state law for misappropriation.
501 U.S. 32Appendix — DAVID J. BROWN v. NORTH CAROLINA (No. 82-5542)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1982
Arnold, 284 N.C. 41, 199 S.E. 24 423 (1973). P. Defendant next assigns error to certain portions of the jury charge. … North Carolina, supra, 428 U.S. 280, and Roberts v. Louisiana, supra, 428 U.S. 325.
Appendix — Buffalo Teachers Federation v. Tobe, 127 S. Ct. 2133 (2007) (No. 06-1168)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2007
U.S. … County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304, 314, 107 S.Ct. 2378, 96 L.Ed.2d 250 (1987) (Takings Clause “does not prohibit the taking of private property, but instead places a condition on the exercise of that
Appendix — Sioux Manufacturing Corp. v. Altheimer & Gray
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1993
Martinez, 436 U.S. 49, 58 (1978); United States v. United States Fidelity & Guar. Co., 309 U.S. 506, 512 (1940). … Mary of Nazareth Hospital Center, 115 Ill. 2d 482, 505 N.E.2d 314, 319 (1987).
510 U.S. 1019Appendix — American Broadcasting Cos. v. Lundell Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1997
Hepps, 475 U.S. 767, 775 (1986);-Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1974). … Bello, 482 N.W.2d 437, 441 (lowa 1992) (no expert testimony required for jury to decide whether doctor breached professional standard of care by injecting incorrect medication resulting in chemical
520 U.S. 1186Appendix — Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1997
Hill, 482 U.S. 451, 459 (1987), it is clear that the Act would “make unlawful a substantial amount of constitutionally pro- tected conduct”, id. … Hill, 482 U.S. 451, 2 Moreover, because of the technology of Internet relay chat, it would need to make this determination before it organ- ized the chat room, since it could not pre-screen the discussion
521 U.S. 844Appendix — Rodriguez v. National Center Center for Missing & Exploited Children (No. 05-1059)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2005
Saucier, 533 U.S. at 201 (citing Siegert v. Gilley, 500 U.S. 226, 232 (1991)). … Cir. 1986) (holding that § 1985, by its terms, does not apply to actions against the United States), vacated on other grounds, 482 U.S. 64 (1987); Brug v. Nat'l Coalition for the Homeless, 45 F.
Appendix — Carruthers v. Duran
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1990
Jordan, 415 U.S. 651 (1974). … U.S. Supreme Court Digest. West. c. 16, 1952 ONLY. U.S. Supreme Court Digest, Lawyers Ed. B-W. 20v. in 29. U.S. Supreme Court Reports, Lawyers Ed. v. 1-100, 1917- 1956. 90a U.S.
493 U.S. 1056Appendix — PT Pertamina v. Karaha Bodas Co., LLC (Nos. 05-1571, 05-1573)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2006
Dist. of Iowa, 482 U.S. 522, 546, 107 S.Ct. 2542, 96 L.Ed.2d 461 (1987) (“[W]e have long recognized the demands of comity in suits involving foreign states, either as parties or as sovereigns with … U.S. Govt.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.