Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
3.63s
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 17, 2008
I just have one comment left on the credibility issue, and that it just appears that, you know, with the concession that the ALJ aired in discrediting her, the basis on which she discredited her, it looks … The question here is – the broader question here is whether she meets the criteria for disability under the Social Security Act. But for a larger than a five-month period.
22 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jeremy Young
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2024
On the waived versus plain air thing, that's slippery. I'm trying to figure out a way to reconcile the cases. … I would say that because I said it in our brief, that plain air is proper.
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Arondo Harris
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 17, 2023
And so I think that we're squarely in the Hernandez case here, where even if that word higher instead of high is an impropriety, it is not plein air. And the Hernandez case was a plein air case. … Louis, I think that that does bring that comment into the invited response by the defense attorney.
28 min of audioOral argument — Chevron TCI v. Capitol House Hotel Mgr
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2023
And if you're going to do something called a confirmation of, and you know, reconfirm a prior act, you've got to make sure that all the people to the contract know it. Now in Mr. … It's different than clean hands argument.
33 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Roberto Adams
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2024
I think the clearest the clearest indication of that is the fact that Griffin air under Griffin v California, which is can be a judge's direct comment, um, on in its instructions on a defendant's decision … That's a that's a hallmark of harmless air review, not a plain air, plain air review, ordinary plain air review for for constitutional areas.
34 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2019
So, I thought one other finding by the director was, it wasn't extensive, that the Superfund cleanup has the effect of cleaning up the air, and to that extent, the passengers and the employees benefit, … We could sue the port because the port is the one who has agreed with the city or commented on the city and the local rates. But our problem with the rates is that they violate federal law.
57 min of audioOral argument — Pluma v. City of New York
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2017
In the end, it got up in the air, no matter who first touched it. … And then it goes up in the air? After a period of time, yes. And then it comes down? Yes. Well, what's ambiguous about that?
42 min of audioOral argument — Calop Business Systems, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2015
You put money in a trust during this brief period of time while you were trying to negotiate with the city. … That's a 2013 case that deals with the FAAA Act, the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act, that is extremely similar to the Airline Deregulation Act, but it applies to motor carriers, and
32 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Hakop Gambaryan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2016
And those were all comments in response to defense counsel saying that we had not proved by clear and convincing. … I believe since January of 2011, the amount is now billed over a 13-month period.
18 min of audioOral argument — Aaron Leigh-Pink v. Rio Properties, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2020
Don't you think that they also bargained for clean amenities and clean gym and not, I mean, bring it into COVID, I hate to even bring it into COVID times, but if you hadn't have disclosed that you'd had … The court has to be somewhat flexible in going back to what Judge Gould prefaced his comments about. It's a murky sea. And so this isn't math. One plus one equals two when it comes to damages.
39 min of audioOral argument — Throupe v. University of Denver
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2021
Thrope's acknowledged testimony that he said that this young lady is wacky when she's on her period? Wasn't it Mr. … We have cases cited in the brief about comments of, usually comments directed at a woman, quote, unquote, sleeping her way to the top.
31 min of audioOral argument — Balfour Beatty Construction, LLC v. GSA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2025
The report, the geotechnical report said the water is clean enough to drink. Well, it wasn't clean enough to drink. … If it's in the brief, it's fine for public comment and publishing, Your Honor.
36 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Orlee Lumiguid
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2012
And causing an act to be done. … And she commented how she wouldn't do this if she were at cell and they should be providing more training.
46 min of audioOral argument — Pipes v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2019
Was he required to fill out certain forms at the completion of the training period? He was filling out the forms. … Carson, the Air Force board doctor, says that the Air Force did do less than desirable medical treatment of this individual. But what about the points or pay argument the government made?
57 min of audioOral argument — Infocision Management Corporation v. Griswold
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2023
The statutory ban period has expired. InfoCision has, in fact, registered under the Act. So you're concerned about other states? Other states and... … We do that even in criminal cases when the defendant dies, the defendant gets a clean record.
32 min of audioOral argument — San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 15, 2011
You know, they can just suck air. That's too bad because the statute gives us this priority. Is that a correct interpretation of the district court's ruling? … But we know that some of the things in the Endangered Species Act and the Clean Water Act will overlap with that.
47 min of audioOral argument — Merklin v. Liberty Life
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2004
No, it was September 98 through November 98 was the period. Right. The 18-month period during which they questioned whether it was – could have been one or the other. … Massey came back and he commented on issues he wasn't even asked to comment on. That's why his report was criticized. They didn't ask him to talk about the psychiatric issue.
34 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Sylvan D. Abney, AppellantX
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2020
You have to wipe the slate clean or reconsider the sentence. And if you impose the same sentence, explain why you're adhering to that sentence based on what the defendant actually said. … Only once the court began to impose sentence was he aware that, no, this opportunity was not going to be extended to him and that he needed to act in order to obtain it.
40 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Antonio Brown
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2026
So let's assume for a second that it is, you can do this in the plain air context. Let's talk about whether it should be done in prong one or prong two. … So if the whole thing was being scrapped to start over from a clean slate, everyone might look at this differently.
36 min of audioOral argument — Floro v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2007
Well, the court did comment specifically on this Kenforo case, but the court commented on a stream or river. … What you would say is that this case is like Air Pegasus in that what was taken wasn't property and there's a line in Air Pegasus that says the harm in Air Pegasus was the result of the government's purported
24 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.