Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.36s
Total Peaking Services, LLC; Notice of Application To Amend Certificate�09�09�09�09
Federal Register · Notice · Jan 25, 2006
CP96-399-002 on January 6, 2006, pursuant to sections 7 (c) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and Part 157 of the Commission's Regulations, an application to amend its certificate of public convenience and … E6-843 Filed 1-24-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
71 FR 4126Energy DepartmentFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionRespondents Brief — United States v. Hale
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1975
Bere r re ey ee 24, 26 United States v. Ramirez, 441 F.2d 950 (5S Cir. uu, Eee 24, 26 (vii) Page United States v. Semensohn, 421 F.2d 1206 (2 Cir. … Only the timing was accelerated. 399 U.S. at 84-85.
422 U.S. 171Brief for Respondent — United States v. Hale
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1975
See 399 U.S. at 79-80.2! … Only the timing was accelerated. 399 U.S. at 84-85.
422 U.S. 171Petitioners Brief — Teleprompter Corp. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1974
S. at 399 n. 27. … Pr only som: 24% of cable systems satisfy the condition. Texeviston Factsoox, Vol. 43, 1973- 74.
415 U.S. 394Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hoffner v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993
Green, 399 U.S. 149, 156 (1970). … Green (1970), 399 U.S. 149, 157-58, 26 L.Ed.2d 489, 496-97, 90 S.Ct. 1930, 1934-35.)
510 U.S. 861Opposition Brief — Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority v. Baker
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986
Q. 343, 399-400 (1960). B. … Q. 393, 399-400 (1960). Other- wise, issues are denied the ripening of a full season of lower court debate.
475 U.S. 1017Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Allen v. California
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994
Nicklos Drilling Co., US , 112 S.Ct. 2589, 120 L.Ed. 2d 379 (1992) 9 Estate of Rath, 10 C.2d 399, 75 P.2d 509 9 Giaccio v. … Section 18431 appears in the Appendix at - 24 -.
513 U.S. 817Amicus Curiae Brief — Lee v. Kemna
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
Boykins, 399 S.W.2d 70 (Mo. 1966), and State v. … Boykins, 399 S.W.2d 70, 73-74 (Mo. 1966).
534 U.S. 362Brief for Appellants — Shelton v. Tucker
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Appellants · 1960
Board of Education, 357 U.S. 399; or Lerner v. Casey, 357 U. S. 468, , or any other decisions of this. … It has been found and is declared by the z APPROVED: February 24, 1959, a
364 U.S. 479Reply Brief of PlantiffPetitioner — McCormick & Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief of PlantiffPetitioner · 1959
alcohol in Section 3124(a) (W) °° *’’:: (App. 24) (empha- - sis added). … Smith, 173 U. 8. 389, 399), was ‘‘a thing made which is useful for its own sake and.
360 U.S. 916Jurisdictional Statement — Associated Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1970
Ry., 887 U.S. 399 (1967) ...............--- fate 2 Chicago, M., St. P. &.P. R. Co. v. Spokane, P. & S. -- Ry. Co., 300 I.C.C. 453 (1957), aff’d 182 F. Supp. … Ry., 387 U.S. 399 (1967); United States v. Drem, 368 U.S. 370 (1962); Frozen, Food Express, Inc. v. United States, 351 U.S. 40 (1956).
397 U.S. 42Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 6, 2025
No. 24-1142 In the Supreme Court of the United States _________ ROBERT H OLMAN, Petitioner, v. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 511 (2006) (Roberts, C.J., concurring).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Jimcy McGirt, Petitioner v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 20, 2020
Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994) ............................. 19, 22, 24 Hinkle v. Abeita, 283 P.3d 877 (N.M. Ct. App. 2012)........... 15 Iowa Mut. Ins. Co. v. … Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 404 (1994).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School Dist.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Dist., 113 F.3d 1412 (5th - BS ft Nr re ore rt Te ere 18, 24 Doe v. Lago Vista Indep. Sch. Dist., 106 F.3d 1223 BR GD SRP cos castle vsesveccisatpavevedcasenes 24 Doe v. Petaluma City Sch. … Supp. 947, 955 (W.D.Tex. 1995), rev'd, 101 F.3d 393, 399 (5th Cir. 1996).
524 U.S. 274Technical, Organizational, and Conforming Amendments to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 1, 2012
(a) * * * (1) Every driver who operates a commercial motor vehicle shall record his/her duty status, in duplicate, for each 24-hour period. … PART 399—EMPLOYEE SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS 79. The authority citation for part 399 is revised to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31502; and 49 CFR 1.87.
77 FR 59818Transportation DepartmentFederal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationU.S. Tobacco Production, Consumption, and Export Trends
Congressional research report · CRS Report · Jun 3, 2003
Exports of tobacco leaf peaked in 1978 at 765 million pounds (farm weight), and then declined to an estimated 399 million pounds in 2002. … In 2002, by contrast, the U.S. share was 14% (Figure 24).
RL30947Congressional Research ServiceOpposition Brief — O'Grady v. Oberhand
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1990
Doilinger, 95 N.J. 399 (1984). … Oberhand’s letter (197197: 6-13; 20T63: 11-17; 20T149: 14-24).
495 U.S. 918Amicus Curiae Brief — Roxanne Torres, Petitioner v. Janice Madrid, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 6, 2020
Benner, 24 F. Cas. 1084, 1086-87 (C.C.E.D. … Rev. 396, 399 (1987); see Utah v. Strieff, 136 S. Ct. 2056, 2060-61 (2016).
Opposition Brief — Schledwitz v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1996
Todd, 920 F.2d 399, 405 (1990). … Reply Br. 24-25 (describing ways in which 302 report could have been used without sug- gesting that Butcher would have been called as a witness); C.A.
519 U.S. 948Reply Brief — Alejandro Hernandez-Delgado, Petitioner v. California
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Oct 31, 2019
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. … Petition for Rehearing at 24.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.