Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
2,676 results
0.12s
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2021
We have a statute, Section 3-102 of the Tort Immunity Act, which codifies a common law duty of care applicable to municipalities. … She lost because the general verdict was if you could comment on that. Thank you.
59 min of audioOral argument — Stamper v. Turtle Wax, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 21, 2019
So it's a long latency period for the disease to come about. And then we have to have, that's where it's similar. … I just have a few comments before I – Okay. We're not – I mean, we don't want to cut you off.
58 min of audioOral argument — People v. Joiner
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2023
One is that the petition was not dismissed within the 90 days the act requires. … It concedes there's a period of time when Gist is not with Petitioner. And that all stands against the very strong identification evidence in this case. Both Leon and Thomas knew Defendant.
36 min of audioOral argument — Young America's Foundation v. Wood
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 16, 2013
This goes to Justice Hudson's comment, which is if we do the maintain, that is the AmeriCorps and maybe that is the rule then in the second district. … So why shouldn't the not-for-profit act be interpreted the same as the authority of the Corporation Act? Why should we treat them differently? Because the legislature does.
36 min of audioOral argument — People v. Patel
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 18, 2020
The officer testified that he requested the field tests because of the observation the alcohol the defendant's admission of drinking within a short period of time and the condition of the defendant's eyes … words in her mouth but opposing counsel seems to suggest that the trial court did not find portions of the officer's testimony credible and specifically I'm referring to when the trial court made the comment
34 min of audioOral argument — People v. Willmer
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2009
I want to go over the specific time periods of the jury deliberations. The jury began deliberating at 10.31 a.m. on February 27th. The jury had lunch. They deliberated through lunch. … If the defendant wants a hearing I suggest the post-conviction hearing act and that way Well, how much do you think is required to trigger the hearing at this point?
34 min of audioOral argument — Wickersheim v. Advocate Sherman Hospital
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 17, 2026
These are the letters from the Board of Directors saying you are hereby granted privileges for a certain period of time. So, again, Judge Otto gave us that. He didn't find any. … Now, in this case, despite counsel's comments, these are not self-authenticating or self-explanatory documents, and I will say that to the court with all candor, I've not seen the documents, which puts
36 min of audioOral argument — In re Marriage of Rade
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2015
The majority of my comments this morning will be addressed to removal and the application of the Eckerd factors, and that's where I think the focus is and is the purpose of this appeal. … With the new act that amends the Dissolution of Marriage Act, 609 is going to be gone.
29 min of audioOral argument — Sherer v. Sarma
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2014
Burger King and those cases where you look at whether or not it's foreseeable, and then you look at the policy questions, whether or not an act of a third-party criminal act would be foreseeable. … You know, as far as the comment regarding confidentiality, I think I already addressed this. But Dr. – our expert said that Dr.
37 min of audioOral argument — Welsh v. Big Ten Conference
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2011
I will try to be as brief and direct with my comments this morning as I was in our opening brief. … The Trade Secrets Act, the plaintiff here doesn't make any attempt to conflate his claim for breach of a confidentiality contract with a Trade Secrets Act claim.
38 min of audioOral argument — International Ass'n of Firefighters (IAFFF) Local 49 v. City of Bloomington
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2016
The award, which is 19 pages long at pages 1-11, discusses the act, discusses the evidence, applies the statutory factors, and there's not terribly anything controversial in the first 11 pages of the award … Just a few other comments.
38 min of audioOral argument — J&J Ventures Gaming, LLC v. Illinois Gaming Board
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2024
agreements themselves and to say, here the parties said that their agreements were going to become, were going to go into effect when they actually installed terminals and they would be exclusive during that period … Blonder, I do not retract my comments that they're really, really good counsel. I do want to correct this. When the court asked Ms.
36 min of audioOral argument — Kraft v. Arcola Township
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2016
So what we're here about, as the court has commented, is Mr. Kraft's complaint that somehow or the other this was sent to his lawyer, who then sent it to him. … But one of the reasons that the statute is written like this is because if a taxpaying citizen requests documentation, they should be able to get it within a certain period of time.
39 min of audioOral argument — VB Apartments LLC v. Ameren Illinois Co.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2021
So you don't have to agree with me yet, but I'd like to hear your comment on that though. … And as part of the plain language of the public utilities act, which is the same act that created the Illinois commerce commission.
45 min of audioOral argument — People v. Lamonica
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 25, 2021
With LL, Anthony started having sex with LL virtually the moment they got to LL's apartment during the period that allegedly she may have been inebriated. … Just, just a few comments.
40 min of audioOral argument — People v. Martinez
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2019
She's also arguing that it had a pretty devastating impact on her life because she could no longer work at least during a period of her sentence as a pharmacist, correct? You're right, Your Honor. … It was reasonable for the jury to believe the victim and I believe that could be what the trial court was saying when it made that comment.
35 min of audioOral argument — Bush v. Central Mortgage Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2014
The trial court's comments at the hearing seemed to be focused a little bit on the timing of proposing the amended pleading. … All three occurred within the three-year period. When did you give notice to Central that you were going to rescind the loan?
55 min of audioOral argument — American Kitchen Delights, Inc v. The Workers' Compensation Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2020
And typically, carriers do not like to pay for things for an extended period of time, especially defense. They'll let you know right away whether you have coverage. … There was a comment there and a question. I think there was a suggestion with regards to the buck stopping with him. He's boss.
62 min of audioOral argument — Policemen's Benevolent Labor Committee v. County of Kane
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2012
It's conceivable, I mean, the courts obviously can't shut down for extended periods of time, or at least parts of them can't. … Now, Judge Mueller didn't comment on that theory in his finding. He just concentrated on the essential services argument. He didn't say yes or no on the contractual issue, the 14P argument.
39 min of audioOral argument — Sekura v. Krishna Schaumburg Tan, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 23, 2018
Do you have any comment? No. I mean, I have no problem with that. I've had lots of clerks. And he's just a member of your firm. You've got a big firm. What firm are you from, then? Daniel P. … So you'd have to have credit monitoring in place for a period of time, you'd have to repair financial relationships as a result of it, they act as yourself by using your thumbprint, whether that's in the
35 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.