Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.18s
Oral argument — Anthony Rodriguez v. Greg Gossett
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2015
Before you sit down, what time period was the school administrator referring to when he testified about the victim's history of fabrications and lies? I don't think we know specifically. … Rodriguez was destroying evidence, his sperm, from cleaning up the alleged crime scene.
20 min of audioOral argument — Michael Jones v. LaPorte County Sheriff's Depa
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2016
acts. … And then it's like six months later, this comment. And then a year later, the first FMLA leaves.
33 min of audioOral argument — People v. Edwards
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2017
So when you apply the first prong of plain air standard to this, to say what we're trying to establish is obviously two things. Was he drunk? Was he driving? … With respect to the state's comment, this was only one small... The burden of proof comment was only one small comment.
28 min of audioOral argument — Bullock v. BankChampaign, N. A.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2013
Then if that's your position, what do you say to what Justice Kennedy said, add in Justice Harlan's comment, that embezzlement and larceny are set off? … One principle I used to learn was he who has clean hands can come into equity, but not anybody else.
60 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2007
And that's a very important issue in this case, because he's mad about Denae's comments at the podium when he says you're acting as a czar when you introduce these new rules here. … Diné during the period of time that he was making these really derogatory comments. It's only once he returned to the audience and spoke out of turn that any action was actually taken against him.
28 min of audioOral argument — Eliseo German v. Robert Horel
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2012
There were – the frolicking detour comment comes from the Morales case, the 2003 California Court of Appeal case. They coined that term, frolicking detour. … It found there were competing inferences between whether the gang members acted as family members because they were related to each other or whether they acted as gang members.
20 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Joseph Robertson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 29, 2017
So he knew that his activity was illegal and he was properly convicted of a Clean Water Act violation and of willful injury to United States property. Counsel, let me ask you a question. … He was told over and over with respect to these violations, that they violated the Clean Water Act. And in the District Court's words, he went ahead and did what he wanted to do anyway.
31 min of audioOral argument — Texas Aromatics v. Intercontinental Terminals
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2023
Then the Clean Water Act, which provides for removal of oil and hazardous substances, is cross-referenced in the liability provision of OPA. … He didn't allude to the fact that the Clean Water Act is cross-referenced in the liability provision of OPA. I don't know if your opposing counsel came up with a completely satisfying answer.
42 min of audioOral argument — David Zindel v. Fox Searchlight Pictures
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2019
When you take a film and you compare it to a piece of paper, you have to imagine, you have to imagine what the audience feels when it's acted out. … It skips back and forth between periods of time. It skips back and forth between different settings.
45 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Corona
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2009
But it's also a plein air issue. … So Fuchs is a plein air case, which we think is on all fours with our case. If here they allege overt acts both within the six-year statute of limitation and without it. Yes.
35 min of audioOral argument — David v. Wheaton College
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2014
There's no reason for this meeting if Wheaton College is not acting, or if Mr. Pollard is not acting as an agent for Wheaton College. … And the allegations that I've resided in Rogers, Arkansas, I only periodically travel to the state of Illinois for religious conferences, those go to the claim.
55 min of audioOral argument — Moncelle v. C.A.P. Air Freight, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 27, 2014
Air Freight, Inc., L.L.C., Matthew Gross, and Justices McDade, Wright, and O'Brien. On behalf of the Appellant, Mr. James Walker. On behalf of C.A.P. Air Freight, Ms. Barbara Snow Murdo. … But that's why we talk about how they don't mean no one wants fat-cleaning standards because they're just saying it must be corruption without a shred of evidence.
54 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Joe Nersesyan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2019
The third-hand comment in the pre-sentence report, if you read it very carefully, and I'm suggesting you need to read it very carefully in this case, is that Mr. … It's going to be over a period of time, right? Correct, Your Honor.
16 min of audioOral argument — Lucinda Beadle v. City of Omaha
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2020
in the air. … Does the autopsy here indicate anything that or did they act like they went straight through or is that a silly question?
31 min of audioOral argument — Broder v. Giba
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2012
Just a few brief comments, Your Honors. Again, back to the jurisdictional issue that has been raised again. … Just a couple other brief comments.
36 min of audioOral argument — In re Marriage of Evans
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2021
Do we want to clean up? I don't see the appellant. I see Truett. What do you guys see? You see Ms. Rice? Oh, okay. Oh, yeah, right, okay. All right. Counsel, are you ready to proceed? I am. … There are two acts at play here, we do have the, the, the marriage act, and we also have the domestic violence act under the domestic violence act under consideration of a petition for an order protection
33 min of audioOral argument — City of Phoenix, Arizona v. Michael Huerta
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2017
Does that have any effect in the nature of a final decision by the agency such that a new 60-day period would start to run? No. … In this case, and it's actually addressed in some of the comments that the city provided to FAA, the normal practice of FAA when they were talking about airspace and air traffic control issues was to actually
74 min of audioOral argument — Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2020
I don't think that's right because a good cause can give you cause to act right now, but it doesn't give you cause to act for 20 years without notice and comment. … So the benefits of notice and comment have to sort of give way a little bit so that the agency could act quickly.
99 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Perkins
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2024
He, you know, if this court reverses the district court's comment. … Then lawyer says within the time period for rule 35, you can correct this.
42 min of audioOral argument — Peabody Coal v. The Workers' Compensation Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2009
I'm talking about within the practical period of time. What is the practical period of time? … It's given notice as soon as practical after the act of disablement.
35 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.