Documents

Oral argument — American Service Insurance v. Lynch

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 28, 2014

But the fact of the matter is there is absolutely no evidence to suggest that anyone acted willfully. … Version three, the best one of all, again had a wrong president, a different wrong president for that period of time. And it required that Ms.

Oral argument — Madigan v. Yballe

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2009

She has to allege that we took some affirmative act that she relied on, that she changed her position to her detriment, but she doesn't allege any such affirmative act. … I would like to just comment, though, that the way this was just the summary judgment was just so summarily entered without the judge finding or considering latches.

Oral argument — People v. Ginugu

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 26, 2018

or failures to act which affect judicial proceedings. … I mean, people act in concert with other people all the time. It doesn't relieve them of the responsibility of their actions.

Oral argument — Bankfinancial, FSB v. Tandon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2013

Trout, the Court again reaffirmed that a DWP order is not final, doesn't become final until the period for refiling has expired. … Actually, my comments are just about over, but I would like to comment on a couple of specific issues that Mr. Tandon had identified in his brief.

Oral argument — Family Amusement of Northern IL v. Illinois Gaming Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 30, 2017

Well, when you say that the trial court erred in denying your motion to dismiss, that seems to be rather global, that the trial court should have stayed out of the process, period. … Your opening comments alluded to that. Right. Responding to the question that was proposed. That's right, Your Honor. That's correct. Thank you. Thank you, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Continental Casualty v. Bertucci

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2010

Policy doesn't apply to acts, dishonest acts, malicious acts, omissions. But don't we look at the whole policy? You sure do. Claims, damages, legal services. … Because the court has – starts with the comment of overreaching. Because every attorney at this point could bypass the limitations on his fee by overreaching.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Rade

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2015

The majority of my comments this morning will be addressed to removal and the application of the Eckerd factors, and that's where I think the focus is and is the purpose of this appeal. … With the new act that amends the Dissolution of Marriage Act, 609 is going to be gone.

Oral argument — Sherer v. Sarma

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2014

Burger King and those cases where you look at whether or not it's foreseeable, and then you look at the policy questions, whether or not an act of a third-party criminal act would be foreseeable. … You know, as far as the comment regarding confidentiality, I think I already addressed this. But Dr. – our expert said that Dr.

Oral argument — Reger Development v. Homer Development

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 13, 2010

As a take it or leave it period. And in the context of the bigger picture of what was going on with the deal, it was good faith on our part. … Okay, so under the Grand Jury Act, can you proceed independently under the Grand Jury Act without some FOIA? Yes.

Oral argument — People v. Balfour

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2015

It's generally a growth of evidence that everybody cleaned up. They sweated people, and people other than Kathy didn't talk. Right? Somebody knows what happened in this case. … So that period is still within the 72-hour period when he gets to the morgue from the 24th. So it does not exclude it.

Oral argument — Anderson v. State of Illinois Human Rights Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2026

The federal cases that the Illinois courts look to, and looking and construing our own act, look to federal cases. … Anderson did bring a prior charge under the Human Rights Act of wrongful termination based on his race.

Oral argument — J&J Ventures Gaming, LLC v. Illinois Gaming Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2024

agreements themselves and to say, here the parties said that their agreements were going to become, were going to go into effect when they actually installed terminals and they would be exclusive during that period … Blonder, I do not retract my comments that they're really, really good counsel. I do want to correct this. When the court asked Ms.

Oral argument — Clark v. J.B. Architecture Group, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2025

They come up with these excuses that the Home Repair and Remodeling Act, that the Mechanics Lien Act says this or that. Those are just excuses that can't be accepted. Mr. … But normally those types of documents like the construction agreement and any letters that you wrote during the period of time before. I can give you an exhibit number for the.

Oral argument — People v. Morales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2019

Summary dismissals are not permitted under the Act. First, Your Honor, is the Brady claim. … And finally, I'd also point out that in Allen, the Court commented again on the first stage standards and informed that circuit courts should not be speculating reasons for dismissal.

Oral argument — The Peoples Gas Light and Coke v. Illinois Commerce Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2025

There is no lease cost mandate under Article 9, the rate making article under the Public Utilities Act. … And that's their burden under the Administrative Procedure Act. Let me ask you about, oh, what?

Oral argument — Mill Creek Water Reclamation District v. Shodeen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 12, 2022

Reese, you did not comment on the trial court's finding that the rule of necessity applied. Do you want to comment on that? I think the rule of necessity applies relative to the conditional appeal. … The money judgment on which we're seeking interest is the holdover rent for the period from 2012 to 2019.

Oral argument — People v. Martinez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2019

She's also arguing that it had a pretty devastating impact on her life because she could no longer work at least during a period of her sentence as a pharmacist, correct? You're right, Your Honor. … It was reasonable for the jury to believe the victim and I believe that could be what the trial court was saying when it made that comment.

Oral argument — People v. Fenske

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2022

But I would also like to turn to the committee comments on 415G because the committee told us what 415 is doing. … They lose the call for a long period of time, and then they find it. So you get a less severe sanction. The call is barred, but not other testimony.

Oral argument — Mt. Hawley Insurance Company v. Western World Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 19, 2014

You have coverage for the respect to liability caused in whole or in part by TOGI's acts or omissions. … Duffy's comment, I kept thinking, can an additional insured ever have greater rights than a named insured?

Oral argument — People v. Keys

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 25, 2023

Yeah, I would have three responses to that first, that again, only proves the acts after not the act before. … It's the fact that that act and the act of burning were separated by at least one to two days.