Documents

Respondents Brief — Ransom v. Kansas

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1984

State, 198 Kan. 21, 24, 422 P.2d 894 and authorities cited.) … Wistory: 1. 1963, ch. 303, 60-2101; L. 1074, ch. 164, § 7; L. 1975, ch. 178, § 27; L. 1976, ch. 251, § 29; L. 1977, ch. 112, § 24; May 14. Seurce of prior law: tad t.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ian Gray, Petitioner v. Florida

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 13, 2026

See Williams, 399 U.S. at 98– 103. … -5113), Terrell (24-5284), and Valle (24-5431).

Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Farina v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1950

Vol. 2, §399, supra, as follows: ‘‘The dirt upon his hands must be his bad conduct in the transaction complained of. … Miss Brieck was only 17 at that time and testified that she never worked beyond 9:30 at night (R. 398-399).

Opposition Brief — Tillem v. New Jersey

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1974

Pennsylvania, 382 U. 8. 399 (1966)... 12 Lanzetta v. New Jersey, 306 U. S. 451 (1929)... 12-15 McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U. S. 420 (1961)... 12,15 State v. Lair, 62 N. … Tillem wanted to know what was said at that inter- view and any subsequent interviews (T169-24 to 170).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kelvin Greer, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 1, 2025

Greer, No. 24-30558, 2025 WL 444417 (5th Cir. … Id. at 24.

Opposition Brief — Air Line Employees Ass'n, International v. Republic Airlines, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986

Briefing on this issue is to be completed October 24, 1986. … Northwest Air Lines, Inc., 13 N.M.B. 399, 403 (1986). 18 The “acquiring” carrier is not always the “surviving” carrier for representation purposes.

Appendix — Grace v. Butterworth

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1981

Id. at 24. … i -84- 399 (1975). Commonwealth v.

Jurisdictional Statement — United States v. First National Bancorporation, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1972

Supp. 95 24 United States v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., 264 F, Supp. 439 24 United States v. Pabst Brewing Co., 384 US. 546 18 United States v. … Phillipsburg National Bank and Trust Company, 399 U.S. 350, 363-64 (1970).

Transcript of Record — United States v. 95 Barrels of Vinegar

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1924

83133-—24--—-1 I u INDEX. … S. 399.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cochran v. Costill

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1972

Cloud 62 Ohio App. 462 Boke ao as : arses na 24 ~ Hudson v. Robinsgh 103 Ohio Meee Soe ee eke. .. 24 Manetta v.’Mutual Life Insurance Co. 94 Ohio App. 399 .... 25 Slick Air Way v. … On — 24, 1969, ‘petitioner filed a written motion “to.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Billy Raymond Counterman, Petitioner v. Colorado

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 31, 2023

Nov. 2, 2004);7 see also, e.g., NCBCP III, 2023 WL 2403012, at *19-24; Beaumont Chapter of the NAACP v. … Vogels, supra, at 24. Black women and other women of color are even more likely to experience harassment.

Opposition Brief — Vernon Montrell Webster, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Apr 15, 2019

Ct. 399, 405 (2018). As this Court explained in Mathis v. United States, 136 S. … PSR ¶¶ 24, 26-28. Petitioner’s burglary convictions all involved violations of Wis. Stat. § 943.10(1)(a) (1989, 1993).

Opposition Brief — Gill v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989

App. 23-24. The court also found that produc- tion of the summoned financial records would not in- criminate petitioner (id. at 24-26). … United States, 425 U.S. 391, 399 (1976). 2. There is no merit to petitioner’s contention (Pet. 6-8) that enforcement of the summons would infringe the attorney-client privilege.

Memorandum — Charles Schneider & Co. v. Commissioner

Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1975

Commissioner, 399 F.2d 603, 606 (C.A. 9). … Nevertheless, petitioners contend (Pet. 24-26) that these salaries should have been found to be reason- able under Section 1.162-7 of the Regulations.

Emergency Application — William Frances Silvia, Petitioner v. Florida

Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Aug 14, 2026

Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986). It is indisputable that Mr. Silvia will be irreparably harmed if his execution is allowed to go forward. The balance of equities weighs heavily in favor of a stay. … (Loran Cole executed 8/29/24; James Ford executed 2/13/25, Glen Rogers executed 5/15/25; Thomas Gudinas executed 6/24/25; Michael King executed 3/17/26; Dominick Occhicone executed 7/28/26; William Silvia

Memorandum — Beck v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1975

Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51, 90 S.Ct. 1975, 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970). … Hence an immediate search is constitutionally permissible. 399 U.S. at 51, 90 S.Ct. at 1981.

Brief for petitoner — Cohen v. Hurley (No. 84)

Supreme Court brief · Brief for petitoner · 1960

S. 399... .11, 34, 37, 39 Burke, In re, 351 P. 24 169 (S. Ct. of Arizona) ewana 26, 30 . iii Cammer vy. United States, 350 U. S. 399 .......... a... Cantelline v. MeClellan, 282 N. … S. 399; and Wel and Globe v. County of Los Angeles, - U.S. 1.

Reply Brief — James Erin McKinney, Petitioner v. Arizona

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 9, 2019

Fleming, 61 So.3d 399 (Fla. 2011) ........................................ 3 State v. Kilgore, 216 P.3d 393 (Wash. 2009) .................................... 3 State v. … See Pet. 24; see also Arizona Capital Representation Project and Arizona Attorneys for Criminal Justice Amicus Br. 3, 6-7. The State does not identify any vehicle problems, and there are none.

Reply Brief — Joe Elton Nixon, Petitioner v. Florida

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 26, 2022

Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ....................10 Francis v. Franklin, 471 U.S. 307 (1985) ......................2 Godfrey v. Georgia, 446 U.S. 420 (1980) .......................9 Hall v. … In light of Florida’s uniquely errorprone death penalty system (Pet. 24), the Court should reject that argument. 2 The canvass in the opposition brief (Opp. 17) is outdated (e.g., in its inclusion of

Reply Brief — Kari MacRae, Petitioner v. Matthew Mattos, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 14, 2025

No. 24-355 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States _________ KARI MACRAE, v. … Educ., 357 U.S. 399 (1958); Shelton, 364 U.S. 479; Keyishian v. Bd. of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 (1967); United States v. Robel, 389 U.S. 258 (1967).