Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,113 results
0.10s
Opposition Brief — Hannaford Bros. v. Ciampi
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1997
Coyne, 482 U.S. 1, 107 Te eo RR ES Bt a ee ae Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers Nat. Pension Fund, 39 Pee Wee BREE Ge AOE a bah ch ca dvicavebcre bess. Hook v. … Coyne, 482 U.S. 1, 107 S.Ct. 2211, 96 L.Ed.2d 1 (1987), and reaffirmed in Ingersoll-Rand Co. The distinc- tion was most recently applied by the Tenth Circuit in Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers Nat.
519 U.S. 1056Opposition Brief — Miller-Wagenknecht v. City of Munroe Falls
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2002
Alexander Grant & Co., 19 Ohio App. 3d 7, 482 N.E. 2d 955 (10th Dist.1983)...............eeeereees 7 Walczesky v. … Alexander Grant & Co., 19 Ohio App. 3d 7, 482 N.E. 2d 955 (10th Dist. 1983).
537 U.S. 882Opposition Brief — Jackson v. Forest Hills Early Learning Center (Nos. 88-932, 88-730)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1998
Jd. at 482. Here, plaintiffs are not simply citizens concerned in the abstract with Virginia’s adherence to the Constitu- tion. … See Valley Forge Christian Col- lege, 454 U.S. at 482. Moreover, a favorable decision for plaintiffs would remedy their injuries.
Opposition Brief — Jeremiah Rodgers, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Oct 19, 2018
Peyton, 384 U.S. 312 (1966) ................................................ 23 Rhines v. Young, 899 F.3d 482 (8th Cir. 2018) .................................. 11 Ring v. … Singletary, 623 So. 2d 482, 485 (Fla. 1993); see Fla. R. Crim P. 3.851(i).
Opposition Brief — Davis v. Zirkelbach
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1999
Pa 520 U.S. 397 SUPE ho Pie Cavs RG did hous Che oie ee és 1] Davis v. Scherer, 408 U.S. 183 (1984) ............. 7,8 Gomez v. Toledo, 446 U.S. 635 (1980) ............. 7 Halperin v. … Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 Soe) BEES ee i ore an rae 1] V-1 Oil Co. v. Wyoming, 902 F.2d 482 (10 Cir. 1990) MME aa 54 FEMA EOE ELA ors ROR kod Fives 4 hh 9 Zweibon v.
525 U.S. 1121Opposition Brief — Overnite Transportation Co. v. Tianti
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991
Coyne, 482 U.S. 1 , Perr re oh eo eee G Levinson v. Spector Motor Service, 330 U.S. 649 Aer err ner ee rhe 2 a oe Massachusetts v. … Coyne, 482 U.S. 1, 19 (1987). Overnite has failed to show any conflict between its compliance with both the MCA and the Connecticut over- time statute.
502 U.S. 856Opposition Brief — Moore v. Board of Education of the Johnson City Schools
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1998
Zimmerman Brush Co., 455 U.S. 422, 102 S. 5. … Box 629 Johnson City, TN 37605 (423) 929-7113
525 U.S. 929Opposition Brief — Farr v. Pitchess
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1976
Mississippi, 403 U.S. 212, 29 L.Ed.2d 423 (1971) . . Samah ae Sheppard v. Veen, 384 US. 333, 16 L.Ed.24 600 oo? FF ee Karlson, Ex parte, (1911) 160 Cal. 378 15 Mayberry v. … Mississippi, 403 U.S. 212, 29 L.Ed.2d 423 (1971) cited by the appellant on this point are easily distinguishable on their facts as the District Court observed.
427 U.S. 658Opposition Brief — Lenard James Philmore, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Jul 26, 2018
New York, 482 U.S. 197, 201 (1977) (observing “it is normally within the power of the State to regulate procedures under which its laws are carried out”) Gnternal quotes/citations omitted). … Illinois Department of Revenue, 482 U.S. 182, 184, n. 3 (1987).
Opposition Brief — McKitty v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1976
Russell, 411 U.S. 423, 433; Hampton v. United States, No. 74-5822, decided April 27, 1976. Agent Crane’s testimony established that petitioner was predisposed to commit these crimes. … Barnard, 490 F. 2d 907 (C.A. 9), certiorari denied, 416 U.S. 959. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, it is respectfully submitted that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.
425 U.S. 972Opposition Brief — SANTIAGO V. NEW YORK (No. 74-1000)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1974
Harris, 403 U.S. 573 v. Harris, 482 F. 2d ae | ar. v. Johnson, 461 F. 2d v. Neal, 500 F. 2d 305 1974) v. Unger, 469 F. 2d 1283 972) } v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. … Harris, 482 F. 2d 1115, 1119 (3d Cir. 1973), with United States v. Neal, 500 F. 2d 305, 309 (10th Cir. 1974); and Durham v.
Opposition Brief — Dennison v. County of Frederick
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991
Hortonville Educa- tion Association, 426 U.S. 482, 496-97 (1976)........ 11 Hozie v. Preston, 493 F. Supp. 42, 44 (W.D. Va. 1980) .... 12 Johnson Co. v. … Hortonville Education Association, 426 U.S. 482, 496-97 (1976). Indeed, there was no requirement of review by this panel after Dennison had already received an eleven-day hearing before Mr.
501 U.S. 1218Opposition Brief — Versyss Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
€ Boprame Court, U.S. 92-1802 |) *trF? … CASEY FOLEY, HOAG & ELIOT One Office Square Boston, Massachusetts 02109 (617) 482-1390 Counsel for Respondents May 19, 1993 _ Appendix 8 Del.
508 U.S. 974Opposition Brief — The Green Solution Retail, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. United States, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Feb 2, 2018
United States, 638 F.2d 1315 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 863 (1981)......... 9, 14 Laing v. United States, 423 U.S. 161 (1976) ....................... 10 Leary v. … United States, 423 U.S. 161, 170 n.13 (1976), that is complete when “an [IRS] assessment officer sign[s] the summary record of assessment,” 26 C.F.R. 301.6203-1; see ibid.
Opposition Brief — Kwoun v. Southeast Missouri Professional Standards Review Organization
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988
denied, 423 U.S. 830 (1975) ...... Mauda k dette 9 Ritter v. Cohen, 797 F.2d 119 (3d Cir. 1986) .......... 17, 18 Simons v. Bellinger, 643 F.2d 774 (D.C. … Weinberger, 508 F.2d 45, 51-52 (Sth Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 830 (1975); Matranga v. Travelers Insurance Co., 563 F.2d 677 (Sth Cir. 1977); Anderson v.
486 U.S. 1022Opposition Brief — Brown v. Gilmore
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001
Nyquist, 413 U.S. 756 (1973)...............00.000.. 30 Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) .......... 2, 20 Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 SEEN Sosa ok-cae heh cae ec: 20 Everson v. … Doe, 530 U.S. 290 (2000) (vocal prayers over loud speakers); Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) (teaching creationism); Stone v.
533 U.S. 1301Opposition Brief — Adams v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1995
Aerojet-General Corp., 423 U.S. 1026 oo BE ee ee er eer rrr rere eee eee 14 Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. NL Industries, Inc., 667 F. EO A 14 Becherer v. … Aerojet- General Corp., 423 U.S. 1026 (1975); see also Gerrard v. Larsen, 517 F.2d 1127, 1135 (8th Cir. 1975) (remanding the case for a factual determination on issues of privity); cf. NLRB v.
516 U.S. 912Opposition Brief — Russ v. Adland
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2003
Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987)........scecee 8,9 Indiana Civil Liberties Union v. O’Bannon, 259 F.3d 766 (7th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. … Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 583 (1987). In County of Allegheny v.
538 U.S. 999Opposition Brief — Bowens v. Board of Law Examiners of North Carolina
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1987
288 N.C. 1, 215 S.E.2d 771, appeal dismissed, 423 U.S. 976 (1975).... 6 Jones v. … [In re Willis, 288 N.C. 1, 8, 215 S.E.2d 771, 775, appeal dismissed, 423 U.S. 976 (1975).}* “The Board is, therefore, an ‘administrative agency,’ Baker v.
481 U.S. 1038Opposition Brief — American Nat. Red Cross v. SG
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1992
Anderson, 234 U.S. 74 (1914) ............5-- 10 Thermtron Prods. Inc. v. Hermandorfer, 423 U.S. 336 (1976) dcnuee nd td nbweeneedoes heehee ens $e00esesetet and + United States v. … Mobil Oil Corp, 453 U.S. 473, 477-478 (1981); Rose v. Lundy, 466 U.S. 509, 518 (1982); Middlesex Ethics Comm. v. Garden State Bar Assn., 457 U.S. 423, 437 (1982).
505 U.S. 247
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.