Documents

Oral argument — Roberts v. Zimmerman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2021

This was, and continues to be, a breach of fiduciary duty that amounted to close to $800,000 for just the time period of 2012 to 2019. … Some comments on that, but no, there wasn't. Yeah. No, that was... I'm sorry.

Oral argument — People v. Smith

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2013

I think, at least in the brief I pointed out, that this court had dealt with a situation before talking about repeated incarceration under the Adoption Act. … And you do agree that at trial you would simply prove the defendant was driving and his license was revoked, period. It doesn't matter.

Oral argument — People v. McDowell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2024

I mean, this case took a rather long period of time. It was out there. There were things going on, I assume, that aren't relevant to this particular issue. … Let's say we get another shot at making an argument that there was a separate act besides the discharge and the defendant could be convicted of murder. Would you think about that?

Oral argument — Northern Illinois Gas Co. v. Illinois Commerce Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2025

That requires an act of the General Assembly. The General Assembly hasn't acted here. … For if it is, then this rule fails because there was no notice and comment rulemaking.

Oral argument — Marriage of Carty

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 31, 2023

Period. Done. No visitation. Nothing. Right. … And if that's what was petitioned for and sought, if it were a motion to modify under the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act, this is a completely different context, because I think now

Oral argument — Gingrich, P.C. v. Midkiff

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 17, 2013

So it would encourage people to act in bad faith and to find a reason to not have to comply with those requirements, simply to not have to comply with the non-compete. … During the period of this agreement and for two years thereafter, it's not effective.

Oral argument — Gracheck v. Court of Claims

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 22, 2014

The trial court made comments which suggested that an order by the Court of Claims might have been inartful and made excuses, if you will, what the Court of Claims could have done and might have done. … It is long established in Illinois that statutes of limitations and limitation periods can be told when there is a misrepresentation by an individual or a fraudulent act by an individual that allows the

Oral argument — People v. Bauman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2012

Quite honestly, because the court sets out a finite period of dates doesn't mean the court is picking the date. … The trial court did address this in some of its comments, and that is – oh, man, I'm having trouble reading the Xeroxed portion.

Oral argument — People v. Valentine

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2022

There's no evidence that Burrell didn't act. Plea counsel Christian Burrell didn't act on the information that she gave him. … All we know is, you know, the brief factual basis stated at, at her plea and that she made some comments in the, in the record elsewhere to psychiatrists and whatnot.

Oral argument — Jefts v. Menard, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2020

Those usually involve the Tort Immunity Act. Those usually involve the de minimis rule. … So why wouldn't he be in a position over a period of six weeks to discover this unreasonable condition, as the plaintiff calls it?

Oral argument — People v. Winfield

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 18, 2014

I was suggesting that as a possible interpretation for you to comment on. … That's one of the comments he makes at the instruction conference. However, that's not the only comment he makes about why it is that he's not qualifying her as an expert.

Oral argument — 1-17-3008

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2021

And we also know that there was no period during which he could have cooled down. … It's a natural human reaction in that situation to continue to act. It's an... What about the fact that he's kneeling saying please? Hassel's saying please because he knows this is an ongoing combat.

Oral argument — Friedman v. Bahalala

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 23, 2013

Their approval of their plans went on for a period of, well, at least three hearings, maybe four? Well, there were two different proceedings. … And also the case that they cited themselves, which is the Bull case, the court states specifically that the decision of the zoning board was reviewable under the administrative act, but the defendants

Oral argument — American Alliance Casualty Co. v. Mercado

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2026

He purchased a policy from American Access, I after, during the two-year period, after this accident and the American Alliance policy went away. … Aguirre because the undisputed facts show that they were a broker acting on his behalf, not acting on American Alliance's behalf. I don't disagree with your honor.

Oral argument — People v. Jackson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2018

Because, number one, he testified to a time period which is after when the alleged event occurred. … There's this sort of amusing comment that the Coleman court states.

Oral argument — In re Commitment of Meadows

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2026

Third, that the prosecutors erred in making comments about treatment post-finding that Mr. Meadows was an STP. … Stanislau had testified that the DSM-5 characterizes pedophilic disorder as an intense, recurrent, persistent sexual interest in prepubescent children over a six-month period. And Dr.

Oral argument — Clark v. Gannett Co. Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 24, 2018

Max is acting as the go-to speaker. How does a mediator do that? … It is in the body of the text, not in a footnote or a straight comment. With respect to Mr. Pioli's comment- Was that ever discussed by the court? Yes, it's in the transcript also. He discussed it.

Oral argument — Dempe v. Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2016

The comment about there were hundreds of GES people on the floor, that's just going wrong. … Metropolitan period has never been in a case where it was accused of negligence that went to trial.

Oral argument — Hawkins v. Nalick

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2012

Because it did involve The exact same factual scenario That we're dealing with here Where a lawyer Takes money Converts checks That belongs to his clients Clients don't find out Until after a limitations period … We understand that But it falls into this category Of unsuspecting victims That the Haddad's case And actually that case Cited to the Haddad's case As a correctly decided case And I've cited The UCC commentators

Oral argument — People v. Cooper

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 28, 2019

He's asking for the opportunity, nothing more than to have a judge fairly adjudicate his confession suppression period. … I want you to comment on why you think we can get around the issue of this based on, well, there's other testimony from other witnesses. Well, so what?