Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.45s
Reply Brief — Gerald Ross Pizzuto, Jr., Petitioner v. Keith Yordy, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Oct 6, 2020
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 405 (1986)). … See Pet. at 23–24. The relevant facts are directly on point. IV. Conclusion.
Reply Brief — Crosetto v. Wisconsin State Bar
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1997
State Bar of Wisconsin, 94 F.3d. 399 (7th Cir. | PPPET re eriit ee ci cre ) re Lye 6 CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS US. Comet. SOME AE cocncivcrswscevccauaee passim RULES Ped, R.. Cin. F.. 85. … State Bar of Wisconsin, 94 F.3d. 399 (7th Cir. 1996). Opp. 16-19.
519 U.S. 1116Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kaiser v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973
Jacangelo, 281 F. 24 574 (3rd Cir. 1960). 20 14, 17, 19, 24 22 22 oS, 20, 13, 24, and 17 14, 15 ll 22 15, 23, 24 22 21 INDE X Cases (Continued) United States v. … Rule 52(a) and (b), 18 U.S.C.A., p. 399, Federal Rules of Crimi- nal Procedure. Section 3481, Title 18, U.S.C.A., p. 488. U.S.C.A. Constitutional Amend- ment Five, p. 4.
414 U.S. 855Brief Amicus Curiae — Loving v. Virginia
Supreme Court brief · Brief Amicus Curiae · 1967
Anderson v Martin, 375 US 399 ...............0.00c0c5e 7 Atlanta Motel v.United States, 379 US 241 .......... ueens At - Bailey v. … Gomillion v Lightfoot, 364 US 399. ’ 20. Anderson y Martin, 375 US 399. 21. Edwards v California, 314 US 160; United States v Guest, - — US. —, 16 L ed 2d 239. ._ 22.
388 U.S. 1Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Prudence-Bonds Corp. v. Silbiger
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1950
Supp. 399, 415, aff'd 159 F. 2d 340). … Supp. 399, 406 (D. Del.). In Cromwell v.
340 U.S. 831Rules of Practice for Motor Carrier Proceedings; Violations of Commercial Regulations
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 16, 2000
It is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. Please follow the instructions online for more information and help. … A driver who violates parts 385 and 390-399 of this subchapter, except a recordkeeping violation, is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $2,500.
65 FR 7753Transportation DepartmentFederal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationPetition — Vance v. New Jersey
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976
New York, 399 U.S. 66, 69-70 (1970). Clearly, New Jersey considers the drinking-driver to be a threat of first magnitude and has legislated ac- cordingly. … Ct. 593, 24 L.Ed.2d 514 (1970). Compare Muniz v. Hoffman, Director, Region 20, National Labor Relations Board, — U.S. —, 45 L.Ed.2d 319, 95 S. Ct. — (1975).
426 U.S. 935Reply Brief — Arthur Lee Burton, Petitioner v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Aug 7, 2024
No. 24-5221 ARTHUR LEE BURTON, Petitioner, v. STATE OF TEXAS, RESPONDENT. … True, 399 F.3d 315 (4th Cir. 2005) .................................................................................... 9 Winston v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Blanton v. North Las Vegas
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
New York, 399 U.S. 66, 73 (1970). … New York, 399 U.S. 66, 73 (1970).
489 U.S. 538Respondents Brief — Holt v. Alleghany Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1966
Qn July 24, 1950, E. E. … (R. 399) .
384 U.S. 28Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Soto v. United States (No. 07-327)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007
Franklin, A iscncctedicadcaciiedbanssciioricencnbentenlal 24 Gaines v. Kelly, Fe eG CP sa cecisivcnesesecseroderatévatinszves 24 Gilberti v. … Louisiana, ~ Eee S| a aes 24, 26 Teague v. Lane, i | En ne passim Tillman v. Cook, BES Se FUEGO Ch, ZOO cscccencicscsiccrecssecoverecees 24 Tyler v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Lewis v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
Crai 4 7 US. 836 (1990) (Scalia,J., dissenting) ii 12 7, 8,11 2-8, 11 5, 7, 8-10 24, 8 Missouri v. 1 459 U.S. 359 (1983) 3 Schick v. … Baldwin, 399 U.S. at 74-5. This is the rule in the majority of jurisdictions.
518 U.S. 322Supreme Court brief · Reply · 1979
Roesch’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari and in response to “Brief of Respondent Opposing Petition for a Writ of Certiorari” served on January 24, 1979. … Addison 62 Cal.2d 558, 43 Cal.Rptr. 97, 399 P.2d 897 (1965). (Brief in Opposition pages 8 to 14.)
440 U.S. 915Amicus Brief — Robert W. Blanchette et al., v. Connecticut General Insurance Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1974
Supp. 451, at 459, that reorganization court 2 399 US. 392, 492. quoting, Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. … The Committee also reported that a study by the Indiana Department of Commerce predicted that a shut<down of the Penn Central would produce unemployment in that state of 24% during the first month
419 U.S. 102Amicus Curiae Brief — Regional Rail Reorganization Act Cases
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974
New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 US. 392 (1970) Penn Central Merger Cases, 389 US. 486(1968) ..... ‘Railroad Commission v. … The Committee also reported that a study by the Indiana Department of Commerce predicted that a shut-down of the Penn Central would produce unemployment in that state of. 24% during the first month
419 U.S. 102Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Wood v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1966
Magnolia Liquor Co., 355 US. 24, at 25. … Magnolia Liquor Co., 355 US. 24.
385 U.S. 978Appellees Brief — Sloan v. Lemon
Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1973
Supp. 399 (S. D. … Everson, dissent, supra note 1 at p. 27. 24. 397 U. S. 664, 694 (1970). 25. 392 U.
413 U.S. 825Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Diaz v. California (No. 08-524)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2009
Heller, US. , 128 S.Ct. 2783 (2008). .. 24 | : « 7 2 d 1 ‘ 3 :. … ee Ue Pe RO eee FEN ie oy ey < sap a 24 2.
Procurement List; Additions and Deletions
Federal Register · Notice · Jul 11, 2014
Dry Erase White Board NSN: 7110-00-NIB-2207—Magnetic Porcelain Surface, Mahogany Finish, Top-Bottom-Side Rails, 36″ x 24″ NSN: 7110-01-334-7078—Magnetic Porcelain Surface, Oak Finish, 24″ x … 10674—Funnel, Collapsible NSN: MR 10679—Baster, Bottletop NSN: MR 10663—Pouf Balls, Bath, Toddler NPA: Winston-Salem Industries for the Blind, Inc., Winston-Salem, NC NSN: MR 399
79 FR 40067Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely DisabledAmicus Curiae Brief — Breed v. Jones
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
Green, 399 U.S. 149, 176-177 (1970) (Harlan, J., concurring); Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 (1972) cf. Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78, N.14 at 83 (1970); Wardius v. … : : (24) me uniqueness of the California stan- dard of factual review, with comparison to the prevailing rules in other jurisdictions, is discussed in People v.
421 U.S. 519
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.