Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.26s
Petitioners Brief — Ohio v. Roberts
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1980
At 399 U.S. 164. 23. At 399 U.S. 165. 19 should follow where the witness is actually produced.” … See Petition, at 24.
448 U.S. 56Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Arnold Tours, Inc. v. Camp
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1970
Georgia Association of Independent Insir- ance Agents, 399 F. 2d 1010 (5th Cir. 1968); Baker, Watts & Co. _ ¥. Saron, 261 F. Supp. -247 ¢D. … §24(7).
397 U.S. 315Petition — JOHNNIE L. JOHNSON v. WALTER D. ZANT (No. 82-5877)
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1982
State, before 399 So. 24 at 1365; and that he actively participated in concealing the murder weapon, Id. 3380, f. 6. … State, 399 So.2d at 1362.
Opposition Brief — Tilton v. Ramirez (No. 05-736)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2005
See Reyes, 399 F.3d at 969-70. … Brown, 399 F.3d 964 (9th Cir. 2005).
Opposition Brief — Lee v. Eklutna, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988
Prior to that time, however, the land was included in Power Site Classification 399, which was issued by the United States Geological Survey in 1950, pursuant to 43 U.S.C. 31 and Section 24 of the Federal … Village of Gambell, No. 85-1239 (Mar. 24, 1987), slip op. 3-4.
484 U.S. 1041Amicus Curiae Brief — Hamed Kian, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 13, 2026
Harris, 1 Binn. 416 (Pa. 1808) .................................... 24 Foote v. Lawrence, 1 Stew. 483 (Ala. 1828)................................... 24 Gibbons v. … See 399 U.S. at 88–90 & nn.22–23.
Opposition Brief — Redgrave v. Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989
See Petition at 17-24. This proposition collides with the Erie doctrine. … Petition at 24. Petitioner cites not a single case to explain what this “due process” claim is about.
488 U.S. 1043Petition for Writ of Certiorari — David Phillip Ryan, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 12, 2024
No. 24- DAVID PHILLIP RYAN, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 90 S.
Security Zones; San Francisco Bay, San Pablo Bay, Carquinez Strait, Suisun Bay, CA
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 22, 2005
′04.7″ W 37°55′41.8″ N 122°24′07.1″ W 37°55′26.8″ N 122°24′35.9″ W 37°55′47.1″ N 122°24′55.5″ W 37°55′42.9″ N 122°25′03.5″ W 37°55′11.2″ N 122°24′32.8″ W 37 … °55′14.4″ N 122°24′27.5″ W 37°55′19.7″ N 122°24′23.7″ W 37°55′22.2″ N 122°24′26.2″ W 37°55′38.5″ N 122°23′56.9″ W 37°55′47.8″ N 122°23′53.3″ W and along the shoreline
70 FR 55607Homeland Security DepartmentCoast GuardPetition for Writ of Certiorari — Hill v. Virginia (No. 06-1394)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006
Com., 47 Va.App. 442, 450, 624 S.E.2d 666, 670 (2006), 1, 7, 8, 24, 24 47 Va.App. 442, 451, 624 S.E.2d 666, 671 (2006), 25 47 Va.App. 442, 452, 624 S.E.2d 666, 671 (2006), 11, 24 47 Va.App. 442, … Code sec. 3.1-399.
Respondents Brief — Herring v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1975
E. 2d 164, 399 Til. 132 (1948) Singer v. United States, 380 U. S. 24 Smith v. United States, 360 U. S. 1 West v. United States, 399 F. 2d 467 (5th Cir., 1968), cert. denied 393 U. … United States, 399 F. 2d 467, 470 (5th Cir., 1968), cert. denied 393 U.
422 U.S. 853Opposition Brief — California Federal Bank v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2005
United States, 399 F.5d 1541 (2005). … Opp. 24, 14-15.
546 U.S. 817Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 10, 2024
Tr. of Oral Arg. at 24:10-14. … Mem. at 21-24; Pls. Reply at 9-10.
Opposition Brief — Barbour v. Louisiana
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2011
Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970). … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 102-03 (1970). 24 CONCLUSION For nearly forty years, States have relied on the clear result of this Court’s decision in Apodaca: Jury verdicts in State criminal proceedings need
562 U.S. 1217Reply Brief — William C. McGee, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 12, 2020
Medley, 972 F.3d 399 (4th Cir. 2020) ................................... 1, 2, 6 United States v. Stitt, 139 S. … See Gary Pet. pg. 24 (arguing that the holding of Gary is “likely” to impact jury trials).
Reply Brief — Blanton v. North Las Vegas
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1989
New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970) was relied upon as authority, which case preserved the “nature of the offense” test. Baldwin, 399 U.S. at 69, n.6. … New York, 399 U.S. 66, 74 n.22 (1970).
489 U.S. 538Petition for Writ of Certiorari — BBF Liquidating, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1972
Code of Civil Procedure, § § 22; 24 ceemeemiaee 22 -_ (al. Corp. Code, § 5012 en : me Bek cheat 13 Cal, Corp. Code, § 5400 nejcceneen-n6, 12,14, 15, 16, 17, 24 _ Cal. Corp. … In view of the fact that Section 399 and Section 5400 were both enacty(!
405 U.S. 1065Reply Brief — Pablo Santana Arellano, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Sep 9, 2024
Brown, 399 S.E.2d 593, 594 (S.C. 1991). See United States v. Arellano, No. 23-10199, 2024 WL 1156535, at *1 (5th Cir. … Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994), Andersen v. Maryland, 427 U.S. 463 (1976), Lakeside v. Oregon, 435 U.S. 333 (1978), and Baldwin v.
Prologue — Bridgestone Corp. v. City of Monroe (Nos. 05-170, 05-168)
Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005
Litig.,— | 300 F. 3d 881 (8th Cir. 2002)..............0.... 24 In re Silicon Graphics Inc. Sec. Litig., 183 F. 3d 970 (9th Cir. 1999).............. 19, 24 Kushner v. … OPINIONS BELOW The opinion of the Sixth Circuit dated February 4, 2005 is reported at 399 F.3d 651 (6th Cir. 2005), and appears as Appendix A to this Petition.
Petitioners Brief — Blanton v. North Las Vegas
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1989
New York, 399 U.S. 66, 70, 90 S.Ct. 1886, 1889, 26 L.Ed.2d 437 (1970) allows trial by jury in DWI. … New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970).
489 U.S. 538
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.