Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.22s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Carlota Copper Co. v. Friends of Pinto Creek (No. 07-1524)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
Andreen, Water Quality Today—Has the Clean Water Act Been a Success?, 55 Ala. … Andreen, Water Quality Today— Has the Clean Water Act Been a Success?, 55 Ala. L. Rev. 537, 592 (2004).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 8, 2020
period. … court could act.”
Amicus Curiae Brief — California v. Stewart
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1966
The following comments have been found to be very effec- tive: ‘Joe, you have a right to remain silent. … The subject’s be- havior during the period in question is an open book to the police.
383 U.S. 903Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Selker Bros., Inc., 949 F.2d 1286 ge EN RE RAR RTE tines airs aed eee 17 Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976) ..... 5, 6, 19, 20, 21, 27, 28 McCarthy v. … It had an opportunity to contest class certification following an appropriate period of class discovery.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 30, 2019
That “clean-up” step helps to sharpen issues for appeal and ensure that petitioners have been heard on all their claims, even if they do not succeed. … The Fifth Circuit’s rule would require petitioners to skip this clean-up step and proceed straight to appeal in order to file a timely appeal. 1. Simpson v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973
—L— 11,12 Statutes Federal Aviation Act, § 611, 49 U.S.C. § 1431. 1 Noise Control Act of 1972, Public Law No. 92-574. 11,12 IN THE ban. … during these hours would have the twofold effect of increasing an already serious congestion problem and actually increasing, rather than relieving, the noise problem by increasing flights in the period
411 U.S. 624Amicus Curiae Brief — SD Warren Co. v. Maine Bd. of Environmental Protection
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Petitioner argues that the test to determine whether the Federal Clean Water Act (“CWA”) requires a Certification under section 401 of the Act, 33 U.S.C. … Warren Company on the Presumpscot River under section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1341.
547 U.S. 370Amicus Curiae Brief — Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. O'Neill
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Commentators have also discussed the possibility of different standards in negotiation and grievance processing. … United Air Lines, Inc., 614 F. Supp. 1020, 1045-1046 (D.C.
499 U.S. 65Amicus Curiae Brief — eBay Inc. v. MERCEXCHANGE, LLC
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Air Act (FPLC Br. at 3-4). 8. … Act (“ANILCA”’) (Pet.
546 U.S. 1029Amicus Curiae Brief — Daniel Grand, Petitioner v. City of University Heights, Ohio, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 10, 2026
, Los Gatan (Apr. 1, 2026). 5 Despite the fact that the WVMA received crossdenominational support from local Jewish leaders, the Los Gatos Planning Commission voted to end meeting and continue public comment … As this Court has well-noted, “[t]he loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.” Roman Cath. Diocese of Brooklyn v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Regal-Beloit Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
Carriage of Goods By Sea Act (““COGSA’”), ch. 229, 49 Stat. 1207 (1936), Pub. L. … These sentiments were also expressed in the AAR’s comments submitted at about the same time to the U.S. Government. See Comments on Behalf of the Association of American Railroads, docket no.
559 U.S. 989Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 3, 2024
They just told us to keep our area clean, which we did.” 136 Mr. … Rodriguez commented, “Almost all of my possessions had washed away. . . .” 141 140 Id. 141 Decl. of Rodriguez, supra note 132, ¶ 6.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Lovell v. City of Griffin
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1938
Neither may a borough, in an _ attempt to keep its streets clean and unlittered, forbid a citizen from handing to another citizen a document of historic and social interest.’’ … It manifestly applies to pamphlets, magazines and periodicals.
303 U.S. 444Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Ali Danial Hemani
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 29, 2026
Marceau, 554 F.3d 24, 30 (1st Cir. 2009) (defining “unlawful user” as “one who engages in regular use over a long period of time proximate to or contemporaneous with the possession of a firearm”) (cleaned … firearm”) (cleaned up); United States v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Billy Raymond Counterman, Petitioner v. Colorado
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 31, 2023
Dep’t of Air Force, 85 F.3d 595 (Fed.Cir.1996) ....................................33 Oncale v. … Stevens, 559 U.S. 460, 468–69 (2010) (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — FMC Corp. v. Holliday
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Self-funded plans, on the other hand, averaged a 24.8 percent increase in the same period. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 USS. at 91.
498 U.S. 52Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 2, 2023
The OPT Rule is inconsistent with the text and structure of the Immigration and Nationality Act. … Ct. 2587, 2609 (2022) 2 The 2008 OPT Rule was set aside for failure to follow notice and comment procedures. Pet. App. 12a.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 4, 2019
Previously, he served as Chief of Staff to the Secretary of Defense, as Acting Secretary of the Air Force, as Under Secretary of the Air Force, and as Deputy Under Secretary of the Navy/Deputy Chief Management … Air Force News, The U.S.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 8, 2019
and its companion statute, the Natural Gas Act. … Natural gas, when used to fuel electricity generation, offers substantial benefits over other fossil fuels, including lower greenhouse gas and other harmful air emissions, low cost, and a reliable and
Amicus Curiae Brief — Goodman v. Georgia
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
of thousands of disabled inmates that a State would typically have housed during that period. … (“[T]o promote the fundamental right to vote by improving access for handicapped and elderly individuals to registration facilities and polling places for Federal elections.”); Air Carrier Access Act
544 U.S. 1031
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.