Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.70s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Exxon Corp. v. Hunt

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986

    In doing so, appellants erroneously inaply that states can only spend response funds on National the federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.) this Court in Chemical Manufacturers Assoc. stated … Recent comments of the House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce confirm the above conclusion.

    475 U.S. 355
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Speech First, Inc., Petitioner v. Pamela Whitten, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 30, 2024

    Phelps, 562 U.S. 443, 458 (2011) (cleaned up). … Bennett, 564 U.S. 721, 750 (2011) (cleaned up).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Tommy Sharp, Interim Warden, Petitioner v. Patrick Dwayne Murphy

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 30, 2018

    The Five Tribes could also promulgate any number of regulations under the SDWA and Clean Air Act 19 Approximately 10% of the oil produced in Oklahoma comes from wells that produce no more than ten barrels … of oil per day during a twelve-month period.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Saenz v. Roe

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

    PLF believes that the welfare reform act of 1996, officially titled the “Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996,” has essentially wiped the welfare ) slate clean. … CONCLUSION The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996 has essentially wiped the welfare slate clean.

    526 U.S. 489
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Aikens v. California

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1972

    any light or ade quate ventilation, and without implements to clean him self. … Criminal Justice Cases and Comments, Inbau, Thompson and Sowle 1% Vol. 1 Ch. 5 at 448.

    406 U.S. 813
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Orkin v. Taylor (No. 07-216)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

    Page National Stolen Property Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2314 ... 7 Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act, Pub. … Act, Pub.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Brace v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995

    Whether the court of appeals’ narrow construction of the “normal farming” exemption set out in section 404(f) of the Clean Water Act, and its expansive con- struction of that section’s “recapture” provision … Amici’s members’ use of their land is severely restricted by the court of appeals’ crabbed interpretation of section 404(f) of the Clean Water Act—an interpretation that eviscerates the Congressional

    515 U.S. 1158
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Whole Woman's Health v. Cole, 136 S. Ct. 499 (2015) (No. 15-274)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

    ASCs provide for a clean and safe environment to have an abortion. … S any judicial forum in which McCorvey’s evidence could be aired.” Id.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Lake Carriers' Assn. v. MacMullan

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1972

    Michigan Watercraft Pollution Control Act of 1970 - ~ Act 167, P. A. … 1970, (Act 167,:Public Acts 1970, C.L

    406 U.S. 498
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — American Airlines, Inc. v. Cruz

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

    acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion.”) … Delta Air Lines, Inc., No. 99-CV-3368 (RWR) (D.D.C.). '' The Convention’s limitations period is two years (see Article 29); March 2001 is two years from the Montreal Protocol’s entry into force date

    529 U.S. 1144
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Brock

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

    Act. … Consumer desires for lower air fares dur- ing a period of escalating costs, especially fuel. Second.

    480 U.S. 678
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Seven County Infrastructure Coalition, et al., Petitioners v. Eagle County, Colorado, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 4, 2024

    The Army Corps’ authority and duty under the Clean Water Act is to protect water quality, not to act as a panoptic arbiter of whether and when any infrastructure of any size should be built anywhere in … The Clean Water Act cannot credibly be interpreted to override this federal-state balance.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Wes Allen, Alabama Secretary of State, Applicant v. Evan Milligan, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 13, 2023

    Id. at 919 (cleaned up). … Bartlett, 556 U.S. at 21 (cleaned up). Of course, “§ 2 allows States to choose their own method of complying with the Voting Rights Act,” and “that may include drawing crossover districts.”

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Center for Biological Diversity, et al., Petitioners v. Chad Wolf, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 5, 2020

    ...................................16 Environmental Protection Agency, Summary of the Clean Water Act, https://www.epa.gov/lawsregulations/summary-clean-water-act ...................13 Examining the Effect … The Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., and the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, 33 U.S.C. § 403 The Clean Water Act (CWA) regulates discharges of pollutants into the waters of the United States.27

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Port Authority

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

    carrier having authority under title IV of this Act to provide air transportation. … Sept. 23, 1977) (Sectional analysis of H.R. 8813, the Air Service Improvement Act of 1977, an early version of Dere- gulation Act).

    484 U.S. 961
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Randall v. Sorrell

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

    Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 EEDA BOI 8 EEF 13 Statutes and Bills ‘Corrupt Practices Act, Pub. L. No. 68-56, Be ee isccticisciclaninnsinnteniinaniotianitniteemeeail i] Tillman Act, Pub. L. … See Robert Drey- fuss, Reform Beyond the Beltway, States as Laboratories of Clean Money, 38 THE AMERICAN PROSPECT 50, 53-54 (May/June 1998).

    548 U.S. 230
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — City and County of San Francisco, California, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 26, 2024

    QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Clean Water Act allows EPA (or an authorized State) to impose generic prohibitions in NPDES permits that subject permitholders to enforcement for exceedances of water quality … INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT Congress enacted the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) in 1972, replacing the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and overhauling the Nation’s clean water regulatory regime.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Seven County Infrastructure Coalition, et al., Petitioners v. Eagle County, Colorado, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 25, 2024

    (e) SPECIFICITY OF COMMENTS AND INFORMATION.— ... (3) UNEXHAUSTED AND FORFEITED COMMENTS.— Comments and objections not provided within a comment period described in paragraph (1)— (A) shall be considered … — (i) is filed by a party that submitted a comment during the public comment period for such administrative proceedings and such comment was sufficiently detailed to put the lead agency on notice of the

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Philip Morris USA Inc., Petitioner v. Armand Fontaine, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Barbara Ellen Fontaine

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 21, 2026

    , the ICC Termination Act, the Federal Railway Safety Act, and others. … U.S.C. § 300aa-22 (National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act); 42 U.S.C. § 7543(a) (Clean Air Act); 42 U.S.C. § 9658(a)(1) (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, & Liability Act); 47 U.S.C.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Hunt

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

    waste that could be disposed of at such facilities over a one-year period. … Public Comment Public comment, with one exception, supported EPA authorization of the State program.

    504 U.S. 334

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.