Documents

Reply Brief — Michigan, Petitioner v. Floyd Russell Galloway, Jr.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 27, 2024

No. 24-198 In the Supreme Court of the United States PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, PETITIONER v. FLOYD RUSSELL GALLOWAY, JR. … United States, 524 U.S. 399 (1998) .......................................... 5, 9 United States ex rel. Shiflet v.

Reply Brief — Benancio Garcia, III, Petitioner v. Steven Hobbs, Secretary of State of Washington, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jun 10, 2026

Reeves, 961 F.3d 800, 801 (5th Cir. 2020) (en banc) (emphasis added); see also Pet. 24 n.1 (collecting analogous cases from other circuits). … Pet. 25 (quoting Appellee State of Washington’s Answering Brief at 21, Garcia, No. 24-2603 (9th Cir. Oct. 16, 2024), DE 23.1).

Petitioners Brief — Crawford v. Washington

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2004

United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968)......... 22, 24, 45, 46 California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970)..........00++ 13, 14, 23, 34 Campbell v. … Green, 399 U.S. at 157 n.10.

Motion to Dismiss — Ludwig v. Massachusetts

Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss · 1976

Ludwig, was charged in the District Court, District of Northern Norfolk, with viola- tion of G.L. e. 90, § 24(2)(a) (driving to endanger). … New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970), requires trial by jury in the first instance, is not substantial.

Card — Berry v. State Tax Commission

Supreme Court brief · Card · 1965

.: Sh. 179, 399 P.2d 164 (1965) 207. 2, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20 Goodwin v. State Tax Commission,’ 286. App: Div. — 694, 146 N.Y.S.2d 172 (1955), 1. … Ed. 458 (1952) pecsnssecessezsenes hy 22, 13, 24, 16, 17 Shaffer v. Carter, 252 U.S..37, 40 S. Ct. 221, 64.L: Ed. 445° (1920) ........... ial edaiacwten eta 3, 18, 19, : State v.

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — O'Bryan v. Chandler

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1969

It is reported in 399 F.2d 916 and is set out as Appendix B to the Pe- tition. The Petition is incorrectly entitled in this Court O’Bryan v. Chandler, Chief Judge. … C. 20004 Counsel for Respondent of Counsel: SHIPLEY, ACKERMAN & PICKETT February 24, 1969

Amicus Curiae Brief — Agostini v. Felton

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

Allen, 463 U.S. 388, 399 (1983) (quoting Widmar v. Vincent, 454 U.S. 263, 274 (1981)) (emphasis added). … The Court noted in Mueller that Nyquist is an aberration in Establishment Clause jurisprudence. 463 U.S. at 399.

Brief for Appellee — Taylor v. Louisiana

Supreme Court brief · Brief for Appellee · 1975

Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 90 S. … Oregon, 406 U.S. 399, 92 S.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Alejandro Hernandez-Delgado, Petitioner v. California

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 10, 2019

United States, 399 F.2d 93, 97 (5th Cir. 1968)). … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 424 (1986) (quotation and citation omitted).

Appendix — J. H. Rutter Rex Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1973

Co., Inc., 5 Cir. 1968, 399 F.2d 356. … NLRB, 399 F 2d 356, 365 iC. A. Sth Cir, 1968).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Clark v. Arizona

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

Pike, 49 N.H. 399, 408 (1870); Durham v. United States, 214 F.2d 862, 875 (D.C. … William Blackstone, 4 Commentaries *24. The M’Naghten test’s reference to mental disease or defect expressly included individuals with mental retardation.

Respondents Brief — Beard v. Banks

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2006

Beard, 399 F.3d 134, 144 (3 Cir. 2005). … Banks, 399 F.3d at 142.

Memorandum — Virgil Nickens, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · Nov 13, 2020

United States, No. 20-5558 (filed Aug. 24, 2020); Owens v. United States, No. 20-5646 (filed Sept. 4, 2020); Heard v. … Medley, 972 F.3d 399 (2020), appears to be at odds with the decision below on the substantive question of whether to recognize forfeited Rehaif errors even when the defendant’s criminal record and period

Reply Brief — Hilao v. Revelstoke Investment Investment Investment Corp., Inc. (No. 08-1019)

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2008

International Yachting Group, Inc., 252 F.3d 399 (5th Cir. 2001) and Jalapeno Prop. Mgmt., LLC v. … For that reason, Revelstoke had no Rule 24 property interest whatsoever in the Hawai’i judgment and its intervention was improper.

Petitioners Reply Brief — United States v. Ross

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1982

carefully analyzed the benefits gener- ally derived from warrants, and shown that they are greatly attenuated in the context of a search of a seized container such as respondent’s paper bag (Br. 21-24 … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970), and limit the automobile search exception to exigent cir- cumstances created by the mobility of an unsecured auto- mobile on the highway.

Reply Brief — Pennsylvania v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1972

This Honorable Court has set forth the underlying prin- ciples governing railroad reorganizations in New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 US 392, 26 LEd 2d 691, 90 SCt. 2054 (1970), in which Mr. … Co., 26 F Supp 18, 24, aff’d sub nom Palmer v. 10 Warren, supra.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bruce Randol Merryman, Petitioner v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 9, 2019

Id. at 399 (quoting Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298, 327 (1995)). … See 569 U.S. at 386-87, 399, 401. The Berry decision clearly does not constitute evidence under the traditional sense of the word.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Amarin Pharma, Inc., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 27, 2026

No. 24-889 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ____________________________ HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC., et al., Petitioners, v. … Microsoft Corp., 399 F.3d 1325, 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2005).

Opposition — Thomas v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1997

JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit was entered on February 24, 1997. … (A. la) Accordingly, the panel determined an opinion was not needed, and entered its per curiam order on February 24, 1997.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Teague v. Lane

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989

Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970) . iv Statutes: 14 Maine Rev. St. §§ 1211 et seq. (1971) “a a oe ee ae Colo. Rev. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 100 (1970). (Emphasis added.)