Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.15s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District v. Friends of Milwaukee's Rivers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
); 42 U.S.C. §7604 (Clean Air Act); 15 U.S.C. §2619 (Toxic Substance Control Act); 42 U.S.C. §11046 (Emer- gency Planning & Community Right to Know Act). 16 by state courts - will be open to independent … 309(g) of the Act, including notice and comment procedures and penalty assessment factors.
544 U.S. 913Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Applicants v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 5, 2024
EPA Misinterpreted its Authority Under Clean Air Act Section 111. … The most common definitions at the time of the Clean Air Act’s enactment required far more than what EPA suggests.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 5, 2024
EPA Misinterpreted its Authority Under Clean Air Act Section 111. … The most common definitions at the time of the Clean Air Act’s enactment required far more than what EPA suggests.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 5, 2024
EPA Misinterpreted its Authority Under Clean Air Act Section 111. … The most common definitions at the time of the Clean Air Act’s enactment required far more than what EPA suggests.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 703 (2014) (No. 14-49)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
Air Act’s requirements. … of power plants under other Clean Air Act provisions.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
Air Act’s requirements. … of power plants under other Clean Air Act provisions.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013
Valley Citizens Council for Clean Air v. Davis, 932 F.2d 256 (3d Cir. 1991)..................cceccceees 5 NRDC uv. … Valley Citizens Coun- cil for Clean Air v. Davis, 932 F.2d 256, 265 (3d Cir. 1991).
568 U.S. 1118Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 5, 2024
EPA Misinterpreted its Authority Under Clean Air Act Section 111. … The most common definitions at the time of the Clean Air Act’s enactment required far more than what EPA suggests.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 5, 2024
EPA Misinterpreted its Authority Under Clean Air Act Section 111. … The most common definitions at the time of the Clean Air Act’s enactment required far more than what EPA suggests.
Amicus Curiae Brief — American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Browner
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Congress established under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401, ef seq. (“CAA”), a umique federal-state partnership for controlling air pollution. … EPA’s Interpretation of § 109 of the Clean Air Act Leads to Absurd and Unjust Results.
530 U.S. 1202Amicus Curiae Brief — Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
8-hour period. … EPA’s Interpretation of § 109 of the Clean Air Act Leads to Absurd and Unjust Results.
531 U.S. 457Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Sues Electric Utilities in Unprecedented Action to Enforce the Clean Air Act,” press release, November 3, 1999.’ … Air Act (“CAA” or “Act”), 42 U.S.C
549 U.S. 561Amicus Curiae Brief — Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Air Act, 42 U.S.C … The Clean Air Act (“Clean Air Act” or “CAA”) grants the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) broad powers over states not attaining these standards.
531 U.S. 457Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Many states, in implementing Federal Clean Air Act requirements,'! … The unit could be permitted in an expedited process as a Clean Air Act minor source and built in only 18 months.
549 U.S. 561Amicus Curiae Brief — Engine Mfrs. Assn. v. South Coast Air Quality Management Dist.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Air: A Review of Title Il of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, 21 ENvTL. … Waxman, ef al., Cars, Fuels, and Clean Air: A Review of Title Il of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, 21 ENvVTL. L. 1947, 1950 (1991).
541 U.S. 246Amicus Curiae Brief — Train v. Campaign Clean Water, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
Johnson j boldly announced in 1966 that “the promise is clean rivers, tall forests, and clean air — a sane environment for man,’‘!! … Milliken of the State of Michigan has commented on this exec ve impoundment: “This action represents a serious blow to our efforts aimed at achieving clean-water goals in Michigan and throughout the
420 U.S. 136Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 3, 2023
Furthermore, the citizen suit provisions of the Act are “modeled on the provision enacted in the Clean Air Amendments of 1970,” id. at 79, which this Court has recognized as containing an “explicit indication … The EPA authorization process includes a public review period, a comment period, and a public hearing, and the EPA retains the right to withdraw its approval at any time. See generally EPA v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Nuclear Regulatory Commission, et al., Petitioners v. Texas, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 22, 2025
Located at 605 Carismatic Lane, Austin, Texas, 78748, SEED Coalition advocates for clean air and clean energy, has promoted solar and wind development in Texas, while opposing coal plants and urging their … The “start clean/stay clean” policy also belies the truth about transport containers for spent fuel.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Air Act of 1970, Section 304, S07, 42 UBC. … See, e.g., Mann, David S., Comment, “Polluter-Financed Environmentally Beneficial Expenditures: Effective Use or Improper Abuse of Citizen Suits Under the Clean Water Act?”, 21 ENVTL.
532 U.S. 994Amicus Curiae Brief — Train v. City of New York
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
Johnson boldly announced in 1966 ihat “the promise is clean rivers. tall forests, and clean air — a sane environment for man," *!!4 [19] US Congress. House of Representatives. … Milliken of the State of Michigan has commented on this executive impoundment: “This action represents a serious blow to our efforts aimed at achieving clean-water goals in) Michigan and throughout
420 U.S. 35
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.