Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
264 results
0.23s
Agency decision · Agency decision
In that case, the Attorney General found that section 242 and section 103 of the Immigration and Nationality Act gave the Service authority, in some circumstances, to impose a bond condition prohibiting … The record will be remanded to the immigration judge for reconsideration in light of the preceding comments.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
and he has failed to establish that he has had legal custody of and has resided with the beneficiary for the minimum period of two years as required by section 101(b) (1) (E) . … The petitioner also has stated that the beneficiary was adopted in 1934 after the death of his natural sou iu order to provide him with an heir_ TheDistrict Director in his order of January 16, 1964 comments
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
record relates to a 27-year-old married male alien, a native and citizen of Tonga, who 'last entered the United States on or about October 12, 1964. - He was then. admitted as a temporary visitor for a period … Suffice it to say, in this connection, that the record before us supports said official's action in this respect, Further comment on the point is unnecessary.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
CHARGE: Order: Act of 1952—Sec. 241(aX2) [8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(2)}—Entered without inspection (both respondents) ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENTS: Daniel E. … The prevalent misuse of the procedures for reopening by many aliens and the resultant delays in their deportation have been the subject of much comment by the courts. See Reid v.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
The abuses described above occurred both during periods of interrogation and during periods when no interrogation took place, i.e., after attacks by the Tigers upon army positions, and when army officers … See Sri Lanka: Comments on Country Conditions and Asylum Claims (Jan. 1995).
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Reg. 10,312, 10,323 (Mar. 6, 1997) (rejecting a commenter’s assertion that “it was not the intention of Congress that EOIR continue to exercise bond redetermination authority under the Transition Rules … The period during which the TPCR were allowed to substitute for the detention provisions enacted as section 236(c) of the Act expired.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Section 241(a)(19) of the Act provides for the deportation of aliens who during the period beginning on March 23, 1933, and ending on May 8, 1945, under the direction of, or in association with— (A) the … We do consider several of the immigration judge's comments about the respondent's character and motivations to have been ill- advised.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
It notes that we commented in our order of January 15, 1963 on this fact, which the Service had brought out at oral argument. … Before the probationary period expired appellant was convicted of another offense in New York.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
I will therefore limit my comments to whether the applicant has established his eligibility for asylum based on past persecution. … See section 208 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (1988).
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewCite as 25 I&N Dec. 486 (BIA 2011)
Agency decision · Agency decision
He was thereafter forcibly deported to Senegal, where he remained for a period of more than 8 years. … See 8 C.F.R. §§ 1208.13(c)(1), (2) (2001).7 7 To implement the IIRIRA, the Department of Justice published notice of proposed rulemaking on January 3, 1997, with a 30-day comment period.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
an indeterminate term at the New Jersey State Reformatory, to run concurrently with the sentence imposed upon Indictment No. 31-58, supra, sentence suspended and respondent placed on probation for a period … Barber, 253 F.20 547 (C.A. 9, 1938). 266 F.2d 825 (C.A. 9, 1959). 9 The court commented ou the case of Fitzgerald ex rel. Miceli v.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Section 101(a)(33) of the Act. … The visit abroad should be.expeeted to terminate "within a period relatively short, fixed by some early event," U.S. as rel. Lesto v.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Some comment is required with regard to certain unfortunate expressions and unsubstantiated theories which appear in the majority opinion. … and "untrammeled authority" of the Attorney General with respect to bond conditions and related matters apply to the period before a final order of deportation, as well as to the six-month period following
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
after such periods.” … City Bank Farmer Trust Co., 296 U.S. 85, 89 (1935) (commenting that the Court is not at liberty to refer to committee reports where there can be no doubt of the meaning of the statutory language); see
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
The letter states that in view of the comments of the Supreme Court in the case of Perez v. … Other situations may be much more subtle, however, and their effects only apparent over a long period of time.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
a period of national emergency for the purpose of avoiding training and service in the United States Armed Forces. i 3 Plainly, sections 349(a)(7) through 349(a)(10) provide for expatriation for acts … His periodic trips to the United States were of brief duration and appear to have been for family or business reasons.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
I write separately to add further comment on the problematic nature of the Board’s uncritical acceptance of the positions of the parties in this case. … Section 241(a)(2) of the Act mandates detention pending removal during the 90-day removal period,3 providing as follows: “During the removal period, the Attorney General shall detain the alien.”
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Counsel's brief and comments to the immigration judge are not evidence. The respondent has been given ample opportunity to present evidence in his defense. … Thus, the respondent was given four continuances over a 5-month period, two of which were granted for the specific purpose of allowing him an opportunity to obtain evidence of the place of his birth and
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Section 252, which is specifically mentioned in section 243(c), attached certain conditions to this crewman's admission: (1) He was only permitted to remain in the United States for the period of time … The only further comment on this point necessary is that the development of our first reason 3 It reads as follows: "In the case of any alien crewman who is ordered deported within 5 years after the granting
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
See section 236(c)(2) of the Act. The mandatory detention statute, section 236(c)(1), took effect in October of 1998 upon the expiration of the Transition Period Custody Rules (“TPCR”). … (D) Aliens in removal proceedings subject to section 236(c)(1) of the Act (as in effect after expiration of the Transition Period Custody Rules) . . . .
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.