Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.28s
Petitioners Brief — New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1979
Tr. 10/24/74, pp. 335, 337) Henry D. … (See Statement of Facts, supra, pp. 24-26.)
440 U.S. 568Petitioners Brief — Illinois v. McArthur
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2001
As dis- cussed infra p. 22-24, these instances did not compromise Respondent’s privacy rights. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51-52 (1970) (automobile).
531 U.S. 326Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970). … Minnesota, 399 US. $24 (1970) (“The Way of a Man with a Maid,” “Lady Susan's Cruise Lover,” and three other books); Grove Press y.
435 U.S. 223Motion to Dismiss — Kansas City v. Darby
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss · 1977
Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 90 S.Ct. 1893, 26 L.Ed. ee ee I areas etiscticesasctiiemscittlipentbiinishtisiiiiitensiidaiili 6 Young V. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 90 S.Ct. 1898, 26 L.Ed.2d 446 (1970); Apodaca Vv. Oregon, 406 U.S. 404, 92 S.Ct. 1628, 32 L.Ed.2d 184 (1972).
431 U.S. 935Respondents Brief — Hunter v. Dean
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1978
Illinois, supra, 399 U.S. at 265 (Harlan, J. concurring). … Illinois, 399 US. 235, 239 (1970), and in this case they are de minimis in comparison even to the modest fine. See Ga. Code Ann. §§ 24-2727, 24-2823 (1976 Rev.).
435 U.S. 967Reply Brief — Seldrick Carpenter, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jan 2, 2025
Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970). But this Court later backtracked from this position, and modern precedent considers the two clauses as distinct. See Williams, 399 U.S. at 92; Smith v. … United States, No. 24-5943 (filed Nov. 6, 2024) at 7; Reyes v. United States, No. 24-5944 (filed Nov. 5, 2024) at 8; Sevier v. United States, No. 24-5679 (filed Sept. 27, 2024) at 6.
Opposition Brief — Gregory Shields, Sr., Petitioner v. Kentucky
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Jan 26, 2023
State, 387 P.3d 986 (Utah 2016) ...................................... 24 Mancusi v. Stubbs, 408 U.S. 204 (1972). ........................................... 9, 19 Mattox v. … Id. at 19:20–24. Maude was elderly but not terminally ill. Id. at 19:10–15. There was no evidence of failing health. Id. at 46:02–26.
Brief for the United States in Opposition — County of Mahnomen v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1943
Ferry County, Wash., 24 F.Supp. 399, 401 CE. D. Wash.) ; United States v. Spacth, 24 F. Supp. 465, 468, 466 (Minn.); 49 L. D. 54s, (1922). … Ferry County, Wash., 24 F.Supp. 399, 400 CW. D. Wash.).
319 U.S. 474Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 2, 2022
App. 1 United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Judgment, February 24, 2022 .......... … Lopez-Diaz, 794 F.3d 106, 111-12 (1st Cir. 2015) (quotation omitted); Caseer, 399 F.3d at 840.
Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — United States v. Jenkins
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1975
United States, 406 U.S. 917 24 United States v. … Sisson, 399 U.S. 267.
420 U.S. 358Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Regulation Project
Federal Register · Notice · Aug 25, 2004
Regulation Project Number: INTL-399-88. … [FR Doc. 04-19482 Filed 8-24-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
69 FR 52331Treasury DepartmentInternal Revenue ServiceAmicus Curiae Brief — Louisiana, Appellant v. Phillip Callais, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 24, 2025
Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2, 7, 11 Loving v. … Callais, Nos. 24-109, 24-110 (U.S. Jan. 21, 2025) . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Brief for Appellee Louisiana Secretary of State, Louisiana v. Callais, Nos. 24-109, 24-110 (U.S.
Petitioners Brief — Idaho v. Wright
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1990
Green, 399 U.S. 149, 157 (1970)). … Green, 399 U.S. 149, 157 (1970)).
497 U.S. 805Airworthiness Directives; Engine Alliance Turbofan Engines
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 8, 2018
We must receive comments on this AD by December 24, 2018. … (ii) EA Service Bulletin EAGP7-72-399, dated June 4, 2018.
83 FR 55816Transportation DepartmentFederal Aviation AdministrationMotion to Dismiss — Robinson v. Georgia
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss · 1978
Effective March 24, 1976, the number of jurors was changed from five to six in the criminal Court of Fulton County. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 136 Baldwin v. New York, 399 U.S. 60
435 U.S. 991Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · Dec 16, 2020
\ - No. 20-399 3xx % (Supreme (Houxi of 4f>e Httiieb (Siaief Jung Hyun Cho et al, Petitioners, v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al. … At the time, Jung Hyun Cho was aged at 27 years and Eui Hyun at 24, young enough to expect their potential income growth in the years to come and eager enough to support their beleaguered parents.
Appellees Brief — Railway Labor Executives' Assn. v. Gibbons
Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1982
No. 96-254, 94 Stat. 399, as amended by the Staggers Rail Act of 1980, Pub. L. … Sec- tion 102, 94 Stat. 399 (to be codified at 45 U.S.C. 1001).
455 U.S. 457Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Gary Patrick Lewis, Petitioner v. Michigan
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 11, 2019
Coleman, 399 US at 9. … See Coleman, 399 US at 11.
Memorandum — Gilbert v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1977
Copy of Our bries in Sellers, 2/ In addits On to the Clai contends, in « ea S Giscussea inet : , > & exhibit received in this omen Some tsonee 7 eptember 22, 1976, tha was no Ope : vw; Atizona, 399 … Morgen, taken from same car constitutes multiple offenses), Barringer y, United States, 399 F. 24 557 (C.A.
430 U.S. 902Petitioners Brief — Arkansas v. Sanders
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1979
United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925) .... 11, 13, 17, 20, 21, 24, 30 Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970) ..-11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 30 Chimel v. … Maroney, supra, 399 U.S. at 50-51.
442 U.S. 753
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.