Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.55s
Appendix — Dow Chemical Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1981
(2) The period during which Dow is permitted to use the SCS to control emissions does not qualify as an interim period under the Clean Air Act or case law. … (2) The period during which Dow is permitted to use the SCS to control emissions does not qualify as an inte period under the Clean Air Act or case law.
452 U.S. 939Appendix — American Petroleum Institute v. Gorsuch
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1982
Agency (EPA) under the Clean Air Act, as amended. 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401, et seq. … Clean Air Act.
455 U.S. 1034Record and brief — West Virginia ex rel. Air Pollution Control Commission v. Gorsuch
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1982
Act, (3) Section 305(e) of the Clean Air 42 U.S.C. § 7601 states: "§7601. … during the comment period.
456 U.S. 972Amicus Curiae Brief — American Chemistry Council v. Sierra Club
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
Cir. 2005) (upholding EPA’s use of ten-year period for use of plantwide applicability limits under Clean Air Act’s New Source Review program). … The Clean Air Act is intended to address this nation’s air pollution problems. 42 U.S.C. §7401(b).
559 U.S. 991Appendix — Indiana-Kentucky Elect. Corp. v. U.S.E.P.A.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1977
The “protect and enhance” language of the Clean Air Act was added by the Air Quality Act of 1967, 81 Strat. 485.” … No later than 10 days after the close of the public comment period, the applicant may submit a written response to any comments submitted by the public.
430 U.S. 953Petitioners Brief — Mann v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1976
Clean Air Act § 110.” … Clean Air Act § 101(b)(1), 42 U.S.C. § 1857(b) (1).
423 U.S. 1087Appendix — Appalachian Power Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1999
* * * * 24a APPENDIX F Excerpts From Sections 110, 111, 112 and 307 of the Clean Air Act Excerpt from Section 110 of the Clean Air Act § 7410. … the comment period.
527 U.S. 1021Respondents Brief — Engine Mfrs. Assn. v. South Coast Air Quality Management Dist.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2004
The Clean Air Act The Clean Air Act (“CAA” or “Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401- 7671q, creates a cooperative federal-state framework “in the struggle against air pollution.” General Motors Corp. v. … The period for comment [6] ended on April 26, 1999.
541 U.S. 246Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kawasaki Motors Corp. v. Train
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1975
Constitution of the United States, Fifth Amendment 3 The Clean Air Act (42 U.S. … Air Act.” 3.
420 U.S. 926Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 18, 2024
available for public comment (hereinafter referred to as the “comment period”). … Air Act and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
The Clean Air Act’s Deliberate Scheme. … language of the Clean Air Act.”
549 U.S. 561Appendix — Michigan v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2001
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, at 4101. … General Clean Air Act authority. 49.4 Clean Air Act provisions for which it is not appropriate to treat tribes in the sarne manner as states. 49.5 Tribal requests for additional Clean Air Act provisions
532 U.S. 970Appendix — Appalachian Power Co. v. Whitman
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2001
; * a ” Excerpt from Section 108 of the Clean Air Act § 7408. … the Clean Air Act.
532 U.S. 903Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 28, 2026
would have been entirely appropriate under the Clean Air Act and general principles of administrative law but would have provided even less guidance to public commenters. … OAR is the EPA office with primary responsibility for administration of the Clean Air Act.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1975
Whether the Clean Air Act authorizes the Admin- istrator of the U. S. … STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED The Clean Air Act amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. §1857a-j (the “Clean Air Act”).
Petition — Pacific Legal Foundation v. Costle
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
The Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. (Supp. … available for public comment (hereinafter referred to as the “comment period”).
450 U.S. 914Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Maine v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989
Air Act has listed eleven requirements for EPA approval of the State Imple- mentation Plans (SIPs) by which the Act’s national clean air goals are to be achieved. … air pollution contained in B-3 section 110(a)(2)(E)(i) of the Clean Air Act.
489 U.S. 1065Opposition Brief — Environmental Protection Agency v. Environmental Council of Sacramento, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
In the event that legislation enacted by the United States Congress during the period of the stay affects EPA’s or the State’s obligations under the Clean Air Act with respect to the final rulemaking … EPA solicited public comment on both parts of the ANPRM. The comment period closed on June 4, 1990.
507 U.S. 910Amicus Curiae Brief — Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
Part 52. occ coco ccececcece cca ceeeeeeeeveeeeceseeeseeeess 7 MISCELLANEOUS Comment, Variance Procedures Under The Clean Air Act: The Need For Flexibility, 15 Wm. and M. L. Rev. … '° 13. 42 U.S.C. §1857d-1: Comment, Variance Procedures Un- der The Clean Air Act: The Need For Flexibility, 15 Wm. and M. L. Rev. 324, 336-337 (1973). 14. Id.; see also Natural Resources.
421 U.S. 60Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Aug 20, 2024
Clean Air Act Section 112’s Statutory Framework........................................ 5 B. Michigan v. … Clean Air Act Section 112’s Statutory Framework 1.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.