Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.96s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Amoco Production Co. v. Village of Gambell
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Section 810(a) Of ANILCA Is Not Analogous To Section 402 Of The Clean Water Act In Weinberger v. … Clean Water Act was to insure clean water for the nation, and the permit process was simply a means of achieving that goal. 456 U.S. at 314.
476 U.S. 1157Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 22, 2019
During the same period numerous states enacted similar provisions. Ibid. … . § 7607(f) (1981) (Clean Air Act); 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(5)(k) (1976) (employment discrimination)).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 22, 2021
FAA—and not the states—with regulating aviation safety, including “the maximum hours or periods of service of airmen and other employees of air carriers.” … ends, a nine-hour rest period is triggered under federal law.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Tarahrick Terry, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 19, 2021
Mobilizing police officers as part of “Operation Clean Sweep,” the city escalated its efforts with recurring raids on open-air drug markets. Id. at 404-05; see Sari Horwitz & Linda Wheeler, D.C. … Operation Clean Sweep to Resume, Officials Say, Wash.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 5, 2018
SUSAN COMBS, ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR FISH, WILDLIFE, AND PARKS, ET AL. … Citizens for a Safe Future & Clean Water, 336 S.W.3d 619, 625 (Tex. 2011).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 23, 2023
The Act contains a three-year statute of limitations for an “action for contribution for any response costs or damages.” 42 U.S.C. 9613(g)(3). … That limitations period begins to run on “the date of judgment in any action under [the Act] for recovery of such costs or damages.” 42 U.S.C. 9613(g)(3)(A).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 20, 2025
Founding Era legal commentators observed that “no one but the infant himself, or his legal representatives, can avoid his voidable deed or contract; for while living, he ought to be the exclusive judge … Pet. at 33 (citing Act of Feb. 16, 1786, 1785 Mass. Acts 510, 516); see also THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THE COLONY OF CONNECTICUT 537 (J.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Port Authority
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
Each slot authorizes the airline to perform one take-off or landing at the airport during a designated half-hour period. … In that case, the CAB, during the period in which it was being phased out and deregulation was being phased in, concluded that specific statutory provisions governing the interim period required it
484 U.S. 961Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 16, 2025
Sunstein, Is the Clean Air Act Unconstitutional?, 98 Mich. L. Rev. 303 (1999) ..................................... 26 Cass R. Sunstein, Nondelegation Canons, 67 U. Chi. L. … Sunstein, Is the Clean Air Act Unconstitutional?, 98 Mich. L. Rev. 303, 337 (1999). 2.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 14, 2024
Beginning in 1983, the Court has issued twelve consecutive decisions in which it declined to recognize a Bivens remedy for a constitutional violation. 3 As the Court stated in Ziglar, during this period … Supp. 3d at 340 (cleaned up). The Second Circuit similarly indicated that it felt bound by existing precedent to affirm the dismissal. See Pet. App. 9a.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Brendale v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of Yakima Nation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
See, e.g., the Clean Water Act of 1987, 33 U.S.C. 61377; the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. 3The legislative history of the Clean Water Act indicates that Congress expressly considered tribal authority … , 42 U.S.C. § 9626 (Super- fund) ; and the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7474(e).
492 U.S. 408Amicus Curiae Brief — San Remo Hotel, LP v. City and County of San Francisco
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
City of San Diego, 450 U.S. 621 (1981) .............. 7-8 Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. United & §! & |: Berry 6 Seminole Tribe of Florida v. … In other words, there was nothing the company could do to “ripen” its claim for equitable relief; that claim simply had no merit, period.
545 U.S. 323Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 29, 2020
To meet the requirements of the Clean Water Act during construction, MVP has relied on the Corps’ Nationwide Permit 12 (“NWP 12”) program, which provides Clean Water Act authorization for pipeline projects … Throughout MVP’s lengthy and complex process of developing and constructing a natural-gas pipeline, it has relied on the availability of NWP 12 to satisfy its Clean Water Act obligations.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Calvary Chapel San Jose, et al., Petitioners v. California, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 16, 2026
Fulton, 593 U.S. at 533 (cleaned up). … Tandon, 593 U.S. at 62 (cleaned up).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 17, 2020
Though such measures are certainly a good idea and can bolster the effectiveness of capacity restrictions, airborne transmission of COVID-19 can render even rigorous physical-distancing and cleaning measures … , while invisible droplets containing the virus may linger in the air.”
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
Utility Air Reg. Group v. EPA, 134 S. … NFIB, 567 U.S. at 559 (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Gerald E. Groff, Petitioner v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 28, 2023
Epps Air Service, Inc., 292 F. Supp. 3d 1314 (N.D. Ga. 2017).........................................16-17 Cloutier v. … Dewey, 429 F.2d at 329-330. 12 Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, and the Affordable Care Act).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Tamer Mahmoud, et al., Petitioners v. Thomas W. Taylor, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 10, 2025
Weinberger, 475 U.S. 503, 510 (Air Force officer wearing yarmulke with uniform implicated Free Exercise Clause but Air Force regulation prohibiting the wearing of headgear held to “reasonably and evenhandedly … (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Herman Avery Gundy, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 31, 2018
Ct. 1807 (2016) (judicial review of agency interpretation of Clean Water Act); Sackett v. EPA, 566 U.S. 120 (2012) (same); Decker v. Nw. Envtl. Def. … And despite “widely assumed [] instruments of political control of bureaucratic policymaking,” such as complex statutory procedures, notice and comment periods, and the requirements that agencies provide
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 30, 2018
Utility Air Reg. Group v. EPA, 134 S. … NFIB, 567 U.S. at 559 (cleaned up).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.