Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters2016

10,000+ results

0.06s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — The GEO Group, Inc., Petitioner v. Alejandro Menocal, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 22, 2025

    No. 24-758 In the Supreme Court of the United States THE GEO GROUP, INC., Petitioner, v. ALEJANDRO MENOCAL, et al., Respondents. … McKnight, 521 U.S. 399 (1997)……… ........ 6, 11, 13, 16, 18, 19 Richmond v. Scibana, 387 F.3d 602 (7th Cir. 2004) ................................. 24 iv Scheuer v.

  • Safety Zone; Munitions Transfer; Alameda, CA

    Federal Register · Rule · Nov 4, 2021

    Coast Guard Sector San Francisco; telephone (415) 399-7443, email SFWaterways@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. … Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the safety zone on VHF-21A or through the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415) 399-3547. (d) Enforcement period.

    86 FR 60766Homeland Security DepartmentCoast Guard
  • Safety Zone; City of Martinez 4th of July Fireworks, Martinez, CA

    Federal Register · Rule · Jun 11, 2010

    Coast Guard Sector San Francisco, at 415-399-7436 or e-mail at D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. … Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the safety zone on VHF-16 or through the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415) 399-3547. (d) Effective period.

    75 FR 33170Homeland Security DepartmentCoast Guard
  • Safety Zone; Barge PFE-LB444, San Joaquin River, Blackslough Landing, CA

    Federal Register · Rule · Apr 17, 2018

    Coast Guard Sector San Francisco; telephone 415-399-7443, email emily.k.rowan@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. … Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the safety zones on VHF-23A or through the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415) 399-3547. Dated: March 29, 2018 Anthony J.

    83 FR 16778Homeland Security DepartmentCoast Guard
  • Prologue — Grabill v. Grabill (No. 05-1178)

    Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005

    . | What Review Will Provide ....... 24 - Conclusion > 27 iV TABLE OF CITED AUTHORITIES CASES Page United States Supreme Court Meyer v. … Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399, 401 BSc wwe Ramee Fe a en eta ek 4,17 Parham v. J. R., 442. U.S. 584, 602 ERP PeE ask Curva aa oa eee ee eas 5, 18 Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.

  • Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Sonken-Galamba Corp. v. Butler Iron & Steel Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1941

    —_— ' y ' Vitite * 4g & te Og 4 on, } } 77 ¥ a. 4 off a teh he \ / lo { wet NL ae a JUL 24 Supreme Court of the United States OCTOBER TERM, 1941 No. 167 SEEN eR ss SPSL a ARE PENS SONKEN-GALAMBA … First National Bank, 106 Fed. (2d) 399. (Kan. C. C. A. 10). Minneapolis Nat. Bank v. Liberty Nat. Bank, 72 Fed. (2d) 484 (Kan. C. C. A. 10).

    314 U.S. 638
  • Opposition Brief — Egan v. Wells Fargo Alarm Services

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1994

    Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399 (1988). … Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399 (1988).

    513 U.S. 929
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Daniel Montes, Jr., Petitioner v. Bertha A. Tibbs

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 26, 2024

    Tibbs, No. 24-20135 (Sept. 4th, 2024). V TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ..iv, 1 Opinions below........... … Mitts, 563 U.S. 395, 399 (2011). Caribbean Mills, Inc., 394 U.S. 823 (1969) ii,2,3,4,5,6 Celotex Corp. v.

  • Reply Brief — Sean Paul Baker, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jun 2, 2026

    Coplan, 399 F.3d 18 (1st Cir. 2005) ............................................................ 7 Other Authorities Rosanna Cavallaro, Rape Shield Evidence and the Hierarchy of Impeachment, 56 AM. … Coplan, 399 F.3d 18, 24 (1st Cir. 2005).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Maggiore v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005

    Alvarado), D'Angelo (No. 02 CR 399). Each knew that leniency required two events. … A-24 To the extent that the motions are based on Meany they are just meritless.

    546 U.S. 1035
  • LOCAL RULES OF PRACTICE

    Court rules · Court rule

    Filing Fees.................................................................................. 24 B. Miscellaneous Fees..................................................................... 24 C. … Bogue Federal Building and United States Courthouse 515 Ninth Street, Room 302 Rapid City, SD 57701 605-399-6000 605-399-6001 (fax) Divisional Office at Pierre: 225 S.

  • Opposition Brief — United Mine Workers of America 1974 Benefit Plan & Trust v. LTV Steel Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1992

    B.R. 399 (S.D.N.Y.), appeal dismissed, 922 F.2d 86 (2d Cir. 1990) ..... In re Chateaugay Corp., 945 F.2d 1205 (2d Cir. … This conclusion is consistent with our reading of the Bankruptcy Protection Act....’’) and /n re Chateaugay Corp., 111 B.R. 399, 409 (S.D.N.Y.)

    502 U.S. 1093
  • Reply Brief — Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ v. Federal Communications Commission

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1988

    FCC, 399 F.2d 65 (8th Cir. 1968) ..........ccccccccsccccccccccccccccccccesssnssccccossoees Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. … FCC, 399 F.2d 65 (8th Cir. 1968), because subsequently the Eighth Circuit “cast doubt’-on its Black Hills decision. May 1988 Memorandum, p. 5, n.5.

    486 U.S. 1032
  • Opposition Brief — Hayssen v. Board of Zoning Adjustments

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986

    County of Ventura (1979) 24 Cal.3d 605 7 Newberry Springs Water Associa- tion v. County of San Bernardino (1984) 150Cal.App,3d 740 10 Zartman v. Reisem (1977) 399 N.Y.S.2d 13 Retzler v. … Reisem (1977) 399 N.Y.S.2d; Retzler v. County Executive (1971) 324 N.Y.S.2d 393. See also Cook v. Marple Tp.

    476 U.S. 1114
  • Reply Brief — Allen v. Montana (No. 09-239)

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2009

    Petitioner's Writ App. 24- 25. … Box 1621 Havre, MT 59501 (406) 265-2614 (406) 399-0326

  • Opposition — Driver v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980

    A-24 to A- 25). The district court denied a motion to suppress this evidence (Pet. App. A-24 to A-27). … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1969); Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 182 (1925). Here, FBI Agent Joseph M.

    444 U.S. 1071
  • Opposition — Second Avenue Ltd. Dividend Housing Ass'n v. Hills

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977

    Computing Scale Co., 261 U.S. 399, PY) EN 7 United States v. Adams, 383 U.S. 39 (1966) 7 Warth v. … Petitioners tacitly admit (Pet. 24-5) that Warth v.

    429 U.S. 1074
  • Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of Administrative Review and Notice of Amended Final Results of Administrative Review

    Federal Register · Notice · Jul 25, 2013

    (collectively, “Respondents”). 1   See Department of Commerce Final Remand Results of Redetermination, CIT Court No. 05-399 (January 17, 2012). … [FR Doc. 2013-17903 Filed 7-24-13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

    78 FR 44928Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Wes Allen, Alabama Secretary of State, et al., Appellants v. Evan Milligan, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 18, 2022

    Q. 399 (2009) ................................................................. 10 Jowei Chen & Nicholas O. … Q. 399, 400-01 & figs.1 & 2 (2009); Clark, supra, at 38-39; Tyson King-Meadows & Thomas F.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kramer v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1976

    Green, 399 U.S., at 161." Dutton v. Evans, supra, at 89. … Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970); and Dutton v. Evans, supra.

    424 U.S. 909

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.