Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Gerald E. Groff, Petitioner v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 28, 2023

(cleaned up). … Id. at *3 (emphasis added) (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Thomas Crowther, et al., Petitioners v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 24, 2026

Doe, 536 U.S. 273, 280 (2002) (cleaned up). And “Congress is in a far better position than a court to evaluate the impact of a new species of litigation against those who act on the public’s behalf.” … Ct. 1931, 1944 (2026) (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — John Sturgeon, Petitioner v. Bert Frost, in His Official Capacity as Alaska Regional Director of the National Park Service, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 14, 2018

Air Act . . . and other federal statutes and regulations of general applicability.” … Like the Clean Water Act, which was at issue in Utility Air Regulatory Group, ANILCA is a long, complex, and multifaceted statute.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Sturgeon v. Frost, 139 S. Ct. 304 (2018) (No. 17-949)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

Air Act ... and other federal statutes and regulations of general applicability.” … Like the Clean Water Act, which was at issue in Utility Air Regulatory Group, ANILCA is a long, complex, and multifaceted statute.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Michael Watson, Mississippi Secretary of State, Petitioner v. Republican National Committee, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 9, 2026

But it did not. 20 MOVE Act did not limit their freedom under the Election Clause to adopt grace periods. … Congress undoubtedly knew states were implementing grace periods, but it never acted to contradict them.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Daniel Rutherford, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 15, 2025

Patterson, 561 U.S. 320, 334 (2010)) (cleaned up). … Lewis, 584 U.S. 497, 510 (2018) (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Applicants v. Illinois, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 24, 2025

This is especially true where, as here, military troops are deployed on city streets 5 with a muddled directive to both clean up general crime, Gaber Decl., D. Ct. Dkt. … Op. at 50–51 (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Bersani v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989

The involvement of LLA members in the permit pro- cess under Sec. 404 of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”’), 33 U.S.C. 1344, is extensive. … ARGUMENT This case raises fundamental issues relating to the exercise of EPA’s “‘veto’’ authority under Sec. 404(c) of the Clean Water Act (‘“‘CWA”’), 33 U.S.C. 1344(c).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Sheehan v. Jackson (No. 09-481)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

Concise Statement of the Basis for Jurisdiction ....... 3 Constitutional and Statutory Provisions at Issue..... 3 Article I, Section 8, clause 4 ............... cece cece sees 3 pee ee S|) 4 PO TE aires … , the place in which the debtor’s domicile was located for 180 days immediately preceding the 730-day period or for a longer portion of such 180- day period than in any other place; (B) any interest

Amicus Curiae Brief — Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

No. 4 (1991). 6,7 iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Statutes and Regulations Page National Labor Relations Act, e FETE Te ET TTT LTE 2,6 EE ee ee 10 Railway Labor Act, e ũ ůAt¾ lll... 2, 5 J ss a kc cnitcareecceccense … This principle is especially important to commercial air carriers, who are charged, under the Rail- way Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. 55 151 et seg.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Pacific Bell v. Pallas

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

I ac a 13 United Air Lines, Inc. v. … Service credit was given for other temporary disability leaves taken during the same period.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Weyerhaeuser Co. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., 139 S. Ct. 45 (2018) (No. 17-71)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

Cf., e.g., Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. Hoeper, 134 S. Ct. 852, 861-62 (2014). … Agency regulations define federal agency “action” to include the issuance of permits for projects carried 12 Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) and are authorized under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act

Amicus Curiae Brief — Shelby County, Iowa, et al., Petitioners v. William Couser, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 6, 2025

App. 9a, but that consideration cannot be the reason for acting. … To the contrary, a clean sweep of preemption cases in every area has 9 examined the effects of laws rather than their purpose. See, e.g., Crosby v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

Streams dry up and often warm during low flow periods.” … House of Representatives, which has jurisdiction over the Clean Water Act and responsibility for oversight over the implementation of that Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — BP P.L.C., et al., Applicants v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 4, 2019

Air Act displaced any federal common law claims over GHG emissions. … They “are confined by a record comprising the evidence the parties present,” and “may not commission scientific 9 studies or convene groups of experts for advice, or issue rules under notice-and-comment

Amicus Curiae Brief — Weyerhaeuser Company, Petitioner v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 6, 2018

Habitat preservation also provides water quality protection, scenic and air quality, biological diversity, and other environmental services. … For example, in response to criticisms of its benzene regulations under the Clean Air Act, EPA under President George H.W.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

Second, because the States share responsibility for enforcing the Clean Water Act (“Act”) with the federal Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), the amici have a powerful interest in a regulatory … Petitioners’ contrary position is impossible to square with the plain language of § 316(b), the provision’s context within the Clean Water Act, and the legislative history of the 1972 Clean Water Act

Amicus Curiae Brief — Robert H. Gray, Petitioner v. Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 21, 2018

Cir. 2000) which dealt with review of EPA guidance issued, without notice and comment, under the Clean Air Act. … In Blue Water, the Secretary argued successfully that the Veteran’s Judicial Reform Act vests Administrative Procedures Act jurisdiction over the Secretary’s actions solely in the Court of Appeals for

Amicus Curiae Brief — International Engineering Co. v. Rumsfeld

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1976

The particular comment referred to appears at the top of page 4 of the memorandum which bears the date November 14, 1960. … The Air Foree did not object to the legend upon the special report.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Gerald E. Groff, Petitioner v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 26, 2022

The standard does not deserve refuge in stare decisis because it is dictum pulled out of thin air. … Kimble, 576 U.S. at 471 (Alito, J., joined by Roberts, C.J. and Thomas, J., dissenting) (cleaned up). 13 CONCLUSION Amicus respectfully requests this Court to grant review.