Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

264 results

0.16s

  • Interim Decision #2185

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    CHARGE: Order: Act of 1952—Section 241(a)(2) [8 U.S.C. 1251(a)(2)J--Remained longer (both rcopondento) ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENTS: Samuel D. … INS, (C.A. 7, No. 71-1886, June 12, 1972), in which the court, in commenting on the applicable Service Operations Instructions, said in pertinent part as follows: ". . .

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • Interim Decision #1257

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Congressional comment reveals that the provisions of section 7 of Public Law 85-316 were incorporated in the Immigration and Nationality Act "for the purpose of codification" and to "codify existing law … The Congressional comment continues : It is not proposed to incorporate into the basic statute a provision contained in section 7 of the act of September 11, 1957, relating to deportation of certain aliens

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • Interim Decision #3415

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Oct. 4, 1996) (comments of Rep. Smith). … suspension of deportation which is filed before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act and which has not been adjudicated as of 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the period

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • In DEPORTATION Proceedings

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Commenting on the fact that Lenin did not worry about a formal majority, Cannon concludes that "no revolution ever awaits for this"; it is enough to have a "real majority" (emphasis in original). … Doak, 61 F.2d 566 (C.C.A. 7, 1932)), but we will deal only with the period from 1938 to 1947 since if respondent had been a member only during such period or any part of it, his membership would nevertheless

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • Interim Decision #3290

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    See sections 242B(e)(2) and (5) of the Act. … After extensive review and comment, the Attorney General issued such regulations on April 29, 1996, effective July 1, 1996. 61 Fed. Reg. 18,900 (1996).

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • Cite as 24 I&N Dec. 382 (BIA 2007)

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    a)(43)(B) of the Act. … Notwithstanding that it is not our custom to comment on the wisdom of statutes, however, we would be remiss in failing to note the bizarre results that 19 See, e.g., Taylor v.

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • In VISA PETITION Proceedings

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    (Aachen) makes inopportune any further comment on the invalidity of the marriage of September 22, 1955. … Nor is any question raised as to whether the child was in the legal custody of and resided with the wife for the required period. There is, therefore, no evidence of fraud. ..

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • Interim Decision #2020

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    A question has been raised as to the beneficiary's standing alder the law to prosecute this appeal (oral argument, p. 6) 2 The ∎oint requires only this passing comment, however, since we will ispose of … be naturalized without any required period of residence.3 Suffice it to say, in this connection, that the Congress has not seen fit to similarly amend section 204 of the Act, which controls here, and

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • Interim Decision #2686 *

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Accordingly, we will affirm the Acting District Director's decision denying this petition. Considering the fact that the law of adoption in Haiti has changed, a few comments are proper. … If during this period the spouse notifies the registry of his or her opposition, the court shall hold a hearing before it makes a decision. Art. 7.

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • Interim Decision #2806

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    The District Director has asked me to comment on another aspect of this case. … L. 95-412 without regard to this period of unauthorized employment, because the status is accorded through the operation of section 203(g), not section 245; and because Pub.

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • Interim Decision #3261

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    The dissenting opinions also suggest that the regulation was promulgated in violation of the notice and comment provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 553 (1994) (“APA”). … It was issued as an interim rule with request for comments, and was accompanied by a specific invocation of the “good cause” exception to the normal notice and comment provisions of the APA.

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • Interim Decision #1859

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Comment was made that if the relationship existed, correspondence between the applicant and her father and other forms of documentary evidence covering a reasonable period of time should be available, … The case involved rescission of a permanent residence status granted under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • Interim Decision #3010

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    The male applicant had entered the United States in February of 1973, as a nonimmigrant visitor for a period not to exceed '72 hours pursuant to a Nonresident Alien Mexican Border Crossing Card (Form 1 … It is also clear from the comments accompanying these regulations when proposed that the consideration of these applications in exclusion proceedings was the method contemplated. 2 See 43 Fed.

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • Interim Decision 4 1270

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    of the statute—section 4 of the Dieplaced Persons Act, 50 U.S.C. … The statute is designed to benefit a particular class of persons, not any national of a country which is undergoing a period of upheaval accompanied by violence.

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • Interim. Decision #1588

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    record relates to a 27-year-old married male alien, a native and citizen of Tonga, who 'last entered the United States on or about October 12, 1964. - He was then. admitted as a temporary visitor for a period … Suffice it to say, in this connection, that the record before us supports said official's action in this respect, Further comment on the point is unnecessary.

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • In DEPORTATION Proceedings

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Seattle, Washington, on June 16, 1957, as a nonimmigrant student, for a period of one year. … In the Matter of S C , supra, the Board, in considering the problem of misrepresentations and section 212(a) (19), commented as follows: * * * the rule is that a misrepresentation which cuts off all inquiry

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • Interim Decision #2992

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    CHARGE: Order: Act of 1952—Sec. 241(aX2) [8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(2)}—Entered without inspection (both respondents) ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENTS: Daniel E. … The prevalent misuse of the procedures for reopening by many aliens and the resultant delays in their deportation have been the subject of much comment by the courts. See Reid v.

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • Interim Decision #1730

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    He was then admitted as a temporary visitor, for a period until April 12, 1965. On July 26, 1965, his application for adjustment of status to that of a permanent resident was administratively denied. … Before proceeding to a disposition of the case on the merits, brief comment is required concerning our original decision herein, which.was made a precedent (Int. Dec. No. 1588).

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • Interim Decision #3336

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Dep’t of State, Bangladesh - Comments on Country Conditions and Asylum Claims (May 1995) [hereinafter Comments]. … The respondent’s claim finds support in the State Department’s Comments, supra, at 7, which acknowledge that the Special Powers Act “is used as a method of preventive detention and in some cases to settle

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • Interim Decision #3417

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Reg. 10,312, 10,323 (Mar. 6, 1997) (rejecting a commenter’s assertion that “it was not the intention of Congress that EOIR continue to exercise bond redetermination authority under the Transition Rules … The period during which the TPCR were allowed to substitute for the detention provisions enacted as section 236(c) of the Act expired.

    Executive Office for Immigration Review

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.