Documents

In the Matter of KAUAI COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

Agency decision · Agency decision

Regarding the need for permits under the Clean Water Act (CWA), the PAO testified that the flood plain manager for the Public Works Department contacted the Honolulu District of the United States Army … Clean Water Act. FEMA also contends that Kauai has not demonstrated compliance with the CWA. The USACE is charged with enforcement of the CWA.

GRANTED: February 28, 2013

Agency decision · Agency decision

Water Act) could entail considerable cost, Expediters expected NASA to perform such water removal at its own expense and at no cost to Expediters. … The contracting officer, on December 14, 2011, issued a final decision under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA).

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Agency decision · Agency decision

Cases handled under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA) small claims procedure are subject to reconsideration as any other case before boards of contract appeals. Cf. Palmer v. … Cir. 1999) (Court noted without adverse comment that board’s small claims decision had been subject of reconsideration); Wayne T. Palmer v.

In the Matter of ROBERT A. CHERRY

Agency decision · Agency decision

– Should the constructive cost of travel by air include the cost of a rental car and gasoline which the employee would have needed to conduct his business at his destination, had he traveled by air? … ’s notice and comment provisions.

In the Matter of LAMAR D.

Agency decision · Agency decision

Axarlis, Division Chief, Financial Operations, United States Air Force Academy, Department of the Air Force, CO, appearing for Department of the Air Force. GOODMAN, Board Judge. … After the employee completed his PCS, his orders were amended again to specify that TQSE would be fixed for a period of thirty days. Id. at 182,644-45.

GRANTED IN PART: January 4, 2013

Agency decision · Agency decision

Butail testified, “[T]hese soils are very, very clean. They’re clean sands and gravel. … Under the Suspension of Work clause -If the performance of all or any part of the work is, for an unreasonable period of time, suspended, delayed, or interrupted . . . by an act of the Contracting Officer

In the Matter of EVERETT L. BUTLER

Agency decision · Agency decision

Background In June 2009, claimant, who had been employed at the Patuxent River Naval Air Station, Maryland, assumed a new position for the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), Oakland, California … The Board’s authority under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. § 504 (2006), does not extend to cases involving travel and relocation such as this one.

In the Matter of CAROLYN R. WORKING

Agency decision · Agency decision

Working indicated that she has been able to manage her “disc problem by frequently stretching, and by not sitting for long periods of time.” Additionally, Ms. … Working contends that she acted in good faith in purchasing an upgraded seat because her supervisor and the ASAC approved her purchase of a premium seat upgrade. IRS policy required that Ms.

In the Matter of BETSAIDA RAMIREZ

Agency decision · Agency decision

In responding to SSA’s comments, Ms. … Ramirez traveled from Washington to Maine by air. SSA shipped her car from one state to the other.

DENIED: February 6, 2012

Agency decision · Agency decision

Statute also imposes a date-dependant slidingscale domestic segment tax for each segment of taxable transportation by air. 26 U.S.C. § 4261(b)(1). … The commercial item provisions implement the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 (FASA), which “streamline[s] the acquisition process and minimize[s] burdensome Government-unique requirements.

MOTION TO DISMISS DENIED: February 22, 2016

Agency decision · Agency decision

Additionally, DOL argues the following: Under the Competition in Contracting Act, 41 U.S.C. § 3304 et seq. … Cir. 2003) (quoting Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v. United States, 811 F.2d 586, 592 (Fed. Cir. 1987)).

In the Matter of STEPHEN F. FISCHER

Agency decision · Agency decision

He was authorized a period of ninety days for SIT. He was granted an extension of an additional ninety days. That 180-day period ended on March 24, 2006, but Mr. … It literally has no power to act . . . unless and until Congress confers power upon it . . . .

In the Matter of THADDEUS L. KONTEK

Agency decision · Agency decision

Discussion “Section 901 of the Foreign Service Act of 1980, which is codified at 22 U.S.C. § 4081 (2012), ‘grants the Secretary of State the authority to pay the travel-related expenses of members of the … That allowance is “designed to help offset costs of meals, laundry and dry cleaning of clothes and lodging in a hotel, pension, or other transient-type quarters, including obligatory service charges.”

GRANTED IN PART: June 2, 2025

Agency decision · Agency decision

Id. at VA000045.1 The contract, which had an effective date of April 1, 2024, provided for a one-year base period, plus four one-year extension options. Id. at VA000001, VA000009. … (15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.) and regulations under that Act), $150,000 or less.” 41 U.S.C. § 7106(b)(1).

In the Matter of GLENDA A. DeVINNEY

Agency decision · Agency decision

The agency failed to fulfill its responsibilities to extend benefits to the claimant, which could have included air CBCA 6726-TRAV transportation, as opposed to the claimant traveling by privately owned … The lack of a timely certification does not act to bar the entitlement for this claimant. Joseph A. Vergilio JOSEPH A. VERGILIO Board Judge

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Agency decision · Agency decision

United States Department of the Air Force, 375 F.3d 1182 (D.C. Cir. 2004). Each side’s position has some merit. … Cl. 1972), so the potential exists for competition for the requirements covered by the option periods.

GRANTED IN PART: March 6, 2017

Agency decision · Agency decision

The agency had the right to renew the lease for a ten-year period: The Government has the right to renew this Lease for a period of ten (10) years. … The parties have offered no substantive discussion on the calculation of interest under the Prompt Payment Act, 31 U.S.C.§ 3901 et seq. (2012), or the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 7109.

In the Matter of COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, CALIFORNIA

Agency decision · Agency decision

(Anvil) to perform debris clean-up work and hazardous tree removal (Anvil Contract) within the County. The County was not a party to the Anvil Contract. … The County acted in a commercially reasonable manner to avoid the duplication of benefits.

In the Matter of BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF BAY MEDICAL CENTER

Agency decision · Agency decision

removal; engineering services for asbestos, moisture, and structural studies; medical care and transport; security; elevator electrical component repairs; and system repairs for heating, ventilation, and air … Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act), 42 U.S.C. §§ 5121-5207 (2018), and FEMA’s implementing regulations require that an eligible facility must have been damaged or destroyed

In the Matter of RUBEN M.

Agency decision · Agency decision

The family’s air travel expenses from the Dominican Republic to Miami and the return of HHG are paid and not at issue. … Claimant remained an employee of USSOUTHCOM after his July 2020 PDS transfer and during the period of his military deployment.