Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.48s
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Atlantic Research Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Over time, however, subsequent acts can shape or focus those meanings. … clean up pursuant to unilateral orders also have cost-recovery claims.
551 U.S. 128Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 26, 2025
Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 324 (2014)). Salvaging the underlying statute by rewriting it is inappropriate here, as the Fifth Circuit correctly ruled below. … This mandate is conceptually similar to – but far more expensive than – requiring businesses to provide for free to their employees clean needles for illegal drug use or condoms for sexual promiscuity.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
tion of the questions presented STATEMENT Through the initiative process, Arizona's citizens have enacted the Citizens Clean Eleetions Aet (Arizona Act or Act), Ariv. Rev. Stat. … Br. 54-55, Clean Elee- tions Inst. Resp. Bro 47-48.
562 U.S. 1060Amicus Curiae Brief — Arkansas v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
of the Clean Water Act, 19 J.L. … See also Van Putten & Jackson, The Dilution of the Clean Water Act, 19 J. L.
499 U.S. 946Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 22, 2021
Shalala, 525 U.S. 449 (1999) ............................................................................12 Statutes Clean Water Act 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq............................................. … For example, in the Clean Water Act, enacted in 1972, shortly after the OSH Act, Congress defined “toxic pollutant” to mean pollutants “including disease- -6- causing agents” that “cause death, disease
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 22, 2021
Shalala, 525 U.S. 449 (1999) ............................................................................12 Statutes Clean Water Act 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq............................................. … For example, in the Clean Water Act, enacted in 1972, shortly after the OSH Act, Congress defined “toxic pollutant” to mean pollutants “including disease- -6- causing agents” that “cause death, disease
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 22, 2021
Shalala, 525 U.S. 449 (1999) ............................................................................12 Statutes Clean Water Act 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq............................................. … For example, in the Clean Water Act, enacted in 1972, shortly after the OSH Act, Congress defined “toxic pollutant” to mean pollutants “including disease- -6- causing agents” that “cause death, disease
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
XIV 5 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. 2 Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. 1001 ef seq. 5 Labor-Management Relations Act, § 303, 29 U.S.C. 187 Labor-Management Reporting … ny years iblic projects, including defense acilities, hospitals, tunnels, air- treatment! hi dros lectrie projects, waste ities, and mass transit systems.
507 U.S. 218Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 5, 2025
STATEMENT OF THE CASE In June 2023, Hawaii’s legislature acted to address concerns about public safety and gun violence by enacting Act 52 (codified at Haw. Rev. … Bruen, 597 U.S. at 30 (cleaned up); PetApp.182a; Antonyuk, 120 F.4th at 1044. The Ninth Circuit just ignored these issues. Pet.App.61a-62a.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Whole Woman's Health v. Cole, 136 S. Ct. 499 (2015) (No. 15-274)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Jd. at 8:55:45. 15 Comments like these were not made only on the Senate floor. … For example, ASCs “have laminar [air]flow, so that we can prevent infections.” June 20, 2013 Hearing at 4:18:40-—4:20:16 (testimony of Dr. Beverly Nuckois).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
period. … Hanley, 318 U.S. 515, 521 (1948), “[Wjhen Congress wrote [a] four months proviso [into the then current Bankruptcy Act of 1938] it was not writing on a clean slate.”
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Atlantic Research Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
“Brownfields Act”). … It merely imposes liability for cleanup costs incurred by “any other person,” without delimiting it to any specific time period or conditioning it upon a further trigger event. 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(4
551 U.S. 128Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 5, 2025
Sometimes, transportation occurs by multiple modes—air, rail, ship, and on a truck. Other times, shipment moves across multiple countries. … The lower courts, in other words, have presented a clean split on a pure question of law that affects billions of dollars in the national economy.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 22, 2021
Shalala, 525 U.S. 449 (1999) ............................................................................12 Statutes Clean Water Act 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq............................................. … For example, in the Clean Water Act, enacted in 1972, shortly after the OSH Act, Congress defined “toxic pollutant” to mean pollutants “including disease- -6- causing agents” that “cause death, disease
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 22, 2021
Shalala, 525 U.S. 449 (1999) ............................................................................12 Statutes Clean Water Act 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq............................................. … For example, in the Clean Water Act, enacted in 1972, shortly after the OSH Act, Congress defined “toxic pollutant” to mean pollutants “including disease- -6- causing agents” that “cause death, disease
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 22, 2021
Shalala, 525 U.S. 449 (1999) ............................................................................12 Statutes Clean Water Act 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq............................................. … For example, in the Clean Water Act, enacted in 1972, shortly after the OSH Act, Congress defined “toxic pollutant” to mean pollutants “including disease- -6- causing agents” that “cause death, disease
Amicus Curiae Brief — CTS Corp. v. Waldburger, 134 S. Ct. 2175 (2014) (No. 13-339)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
TIED cveceecensecssicnsincssiiitenitaititladisitiiaiididbasdiimaaasns nn 29 Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. … Fish) (“The purpose of the Super- fund law is to provide a Federal response to the ur- gent need to clean up existing hazardous waste sites.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 25, 2023
air make the area a sanctuary for people.” … Laws act 94 (signed Jun. 21, 2023), and to defray unaffordable housing by providing home financing assistance. See 2023 Haw. Sess. Laws act 96 (signed Jun. 21, 2023).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Southview Farm v. Concerned Area Residents for the Environment
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995
Water Act. 2. … Water Act.
514 U.S. 1082Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Through the regular course of operating their businesses, NAHB’s members are subject to regulations under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”). … The Fifth Circuit correctly applied the adjacency requirements of SWANCC recognizing that “the Clean Water Act. . .
541 U.S. 972
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.