Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

Rather, it was developed over a period of time” through statements of policy (without notice and comment) and case- by-case adjudications. … In its Comments, the ACLU also asserts that in the short period of time since the 1985 Fairness Report, the number of low power television stations has increased by 12 percent from 341 stations to 383

Amicus Curiae Brief — John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States (No. 06-1164)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

NAHB appeared before the Court as a petitioner in a case decided earlier this term concerning the Clean Water and Endangered Species Acts, NAHB v. … There is nothing in the Tucker Act — and certainly no language in the Fifth Amendment — to support a conclusion that the six-year period in 28 U.S.C. § 2501 ran out prior to the ripening point of Petitioner

Amicus Curiae Brief — Harper v. Virginia Dept. of Taxation

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993

Air Force. AIR FORCE SERGEANTS ASSOCIATION (AFSA) The Air Force Sergeants Association was founded in 1961. … It has approximately 161,000 members and is composed of active and retired enlisted personnel in the Air Force, Air National Guard, Air Force Reserve, Army Air Corps and Army Air Force.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Jason Fyk, Petitioner v. Facebook, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 27, 2025

Air Force Lieutenant Colonel and Vietnam veteran. At 85, he has no financial interest in this case – only a lifelong commitment to defending the liberties that define our nation. … SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT 47 U.S.C. § 230 (“Section 230”) was passed as part of the Communications Decency Act — not the Communications Immunity Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Cedric Galette, Petitioner v. New Jersey Transit Corporation

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 10, 2025

Comm’n, 535 U.S. at 765 (cleaned up). … Stat. § 173.385.1 (cleaned up)).

Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 19, 2019

See Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Water Act; ConAgra, Inc., 63 Fed. … Reg. at 3018-20. 39 Comment of Attorneys General of Maryland, California, Massachusetts, Oregon, and Vermont on Clean Water Act Coverage of “Discharges of Pollutants” via a Direct Hydrologic Connection

Amicus Curiae Brief — Butler v. Federal Aviation Administration

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

publication (January 1960) as the personal and editorial comment of its president. … No [air carrier] accidents were attributed to incapacitation during the period 1968- 1977.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Wetlands Action Network v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

The developer here sought a permit under section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. § 1344) from the Corps of Engineers to destroy wetlands in order to build Phase I of its mixed-use com- mercial … For example, a completed federal high- way by itself generates no air pollution.

Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 16, 2019

The hydrologic-connection theory is inconsistent with the Clean Water Act, which memorializes Congress’s intent to leave regulation of groundwater to the states. II.B. … Code Regs. 5.00 et seq. (2016), Massachusetts Clean Waters Act, Mass. Gen.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Arkansas v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

Such a result is clearly contrary to the Clean Water Act. … The Clean Water Act’s designation of a U.S.

Amicus Curiae Brief — EEOC v. Waffle House, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

Such a result would 4 undermine the carefully constructed enforcement process established by Congress over a sixty-year period. … See, eg, Aviation Whistleblower Protection Provision, 49 U.S.C. § 42121(c)(5) (Secretary of Labor discretion to file civil action to enforce law and seek compensatory damages); Clean Air Act Employee

Amicus Curiae Brief — Shell Oil Co. v. United States (Nos. 07-1607, 07-1601)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

costs under CERCLA, even if they never acted with the intent to dispose of a hazardous substance. … EPA's ac- tion against GE stems from sales that occurred be- tween 1953 and 1967.* During that period, Monsanto Company manufactured Aroclor, a chemical product containing polychlorinated biphenyls

Amicus Curiae Brief — Nick Feliciano, Petitioner v. Department of Transportation

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 26, 2024

Standard Oil Co., 452 U.S. 549, 557 (1981) (cleaned up). … Air Reserve Personnel Center, In order to preserve the nation’s combat readiness, http://tinyurl.com/337w8p2j (last visited Aug. 25, 2024).

Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Chicago v. Environmental Defense Fund

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

Citizens for Clean Air v. City of Spokane, 114 Wn.2d 20, 785 P.2d 447 (1990). … Code ch. 173-306 (1990), to implement the Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Jean Francois Pugin, Petitioner v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 8, 2022

Chevron itself provided the first archetypal example: The Environmental Protection Agency was there construing a technical provision of the Clean Air Act that defined a “stationary source” for pollutants … (cleaned up)); OfficeMax, Inc. v. United States, 428 F.3d 583, 592 (6th Cir. 2005) (Sutton, J.)

Amicus Curiae Brief — Public Lands Council v. Babbitt

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

Unlike the Clean Air Act Amendments involved in Chevron, the Tay- lor Grazing Act is not “lengthy, detailed, technical [or] complex,” Chevron at 848, nor does its comprehension depend upon “more than … The second, 43 U.S.C. § 1752, addressing grazing permits issued under the Taylor Grazing Act, provides that permits shall be issued for a period of ten years and will be subject to conditions imposed

Amicus Curiae Brief — IQVIA Inc., Petitioner v. Superior Court of California, Alameda County, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 17, 2025

United States, 505 U.S. 144, 181 (1992) (cleaned up). … REV. 169, 196 (2004) (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Obergefell v. Hodges

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

Mohler is widely sought as a columnist and commentator. … Acts 19:23-34.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska v. Southeast Alaska Alaska Conservation Council (No. 07-990)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

I cc tia asiinlicinaiie 2, 17,19 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. $ 1S11................00c0...00..-.5. 2 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1316 ......................00...... 2 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1342 … 402 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1342.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Airwork Service Division v. Director, Division of Taxation of New Jersey

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

®*The New Jersey Administrative Procedure Act, N.J.S.A. 52:14B-1 et seq., mandates the completion of certain notice and comment procedures before a valid administrative rule can be adopted. … The court also found it significant that shortly after the tax period at issue, the lezislature en- acted a sales tax exemption covering precisely the type of sale the state was attempting to tax.