Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.40s
Petition — Environmental Protection Agency v. Duquesne Light Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976
Air Act Amendments of 1970:! … In adopting the Clean Air Act Amendments, the Ad- ministrator asserts, Congress decided that the expense of pollution control was not to be regarded as an impediment to achieving clean air.
427 U.S. 648Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Bishop Processing Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1970
Whether thirty-one instances of malodor over a consecutive fourteen-week observation period constitutes as a matter of law a violation of the federal Clean Air Act, 42 U. S. … Prosecution of the case is based upon the federal Clean Air Act, 42 U. S.
398 U.S. 904Memorandum — Environmental Protection Agency v. Duquesne Light Co.
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1976
Section 110 (a) (1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 84 Stat. 1680, 42 U.S.C. 1857c-5(a) (1), provides that each state within a specified period of time after the promulgation of ambient air quality … with regard to the construction of the Clean Air Act which are at issue here.
427 U.S. 648Petitioners Brief — Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1983
Although the Clean Air Act is silent concerning oral com- munications after the close of the comment period, the court of appeals’ ruling established important restrictions on such eon ‘nications. … As one commentator observed: “(T]he court elaborated at great length on the often puzzling requirements of section 307 of the Clean Air Act, with the result that those involved in Clean Air Act rulemakings
463 U.S. 680Appendix — Mann v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1976
No later than 10 days after the close of the public comment period, the appli- cant may submit a written response to any comments submitted by the public. … APPENDIX C Relevant excerpts from the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1857 et seq., are as follows: § 1857. [§ 101.]
423 U.S. 1087Joint Appendix — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · Dec 13, 2021
Air Act Amendments of 1970,” § 4, 84 Stat, at 1684. 226 “Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970,” § 4, 84 Stat, at 1685. 227 “Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970,” § 4, 84 Stat, at 1685. 228 H.R. … See “Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,” § 108, 104 Stat. 2467. 261 “Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,” § 403, 104 Stat, at 2631. 262 “Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,” § 301, 104 Stat, at 2631. 460
Joint Appendix — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · Dec 13, 2021
These emission guidelines are developed in accordance with section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act and subpart B of this part. … These emission guidelines are developed in accordance with section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act and subpart Ba of this part.
Joint Appendix — Util. Air Regulatory Grp. v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-47)
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 2014
Section 312 of the Clean Air Act required an economic analysis of all Clean Air Act programs and certain updates. Id. § 7612. … Section 112 of the Clean Air Act.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 29, 2018
Clean Air Act Section 612 In 1990, Congress enacted Title VI of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7671–7671q, to implement and go beyond the requirements of the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete … THE DECISION BELOW DESTROYS A CORE CLEAN AIR ACT PROGRAM AND PUTS MILLIONS OF AMERICANS IN DANGER When Congress enacted Title VI of the Clean Air Act it wanted to make sure that the phase-out of ozonedepleting
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — American Lung Ass'n v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1999
(“NAAQS”) for sulfur dioxide (“SO2”) under § 109 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”).! … the close of the public comment period].”
528 U.S. 818Joint Appendix — Michigan v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-46)
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 2014
Section 312 of the Clean Air Act required an economic analysis of all Clean Air Act programs and certain updates. Id. § 7612. … Section 112 of the Clean Air Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
. § 706(2)(A) ...... 66. ee eee eee 5 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. … of the Clean Air Act reveals why the D.C.
531 U.S. 457Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
THE NINTH CIRCUITS DECISION GROSSLY DISTORTS THE BALANCE OF STATE AND FEDERAL RESPONSIBILITIES SET OUT IN THE STRUCTURE OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT... … THE NINTH CIRCUIT’S DECISION GROSSLY DISTORTS THE BALANCE OF STATE AND FEDERAL RESPONSIBILITIES SET OUT IN THE STRUCTURE OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT Congress has declared in the federal Clean Air Act (CAA
540 U.S. 461Cross Petition — American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Browner
Supreme Court brief · Cross Petition · 2000
Clean Air Act § 109(d)(1), - 42 U.S.C. § T4OKHGM1) 0. cece eee 19, Clean Air Act § 112(b)(1)(B), 42 U.S.C. § 7412(b)(1)(B) (1982) ...... 6 ee eee 17 Clean Air Act § 302(h), 2 Peas Com be Clean … available for public comment (hereinafter referred to as the “comment period”).
530 U.S. 1202Amicus Curiae Brief — Central Arizona Water Conservation District v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
quality at the Grand Canyon National Park ("Park") pursuant to the Clean Air Act's Visibility Protection Program. … Air Act).
510 U.S. 828Amicus Brief — Public Service Co. of Indiana v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1983
EPA, 478 F.2d 126 ...... 10 Statutes, regulations and rules: Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, Pub. L. No. 91-604, 84 Stat. 1976, 42 U.S.C. … (1976 ed.) 1857 ef S “ũ ꝓe „„ l Section 307(b), 42 U.S.C. (1976 ed.) 1 10 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, 42 U.S.C. (Supp.
459 U.S. 1127Petition for Writ of Certiorari — American Air Filter Co. v. Continental Air Filters, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1966
air; and periodic manual cleaning of the filter media made necessary, or desirable, by physical entanglement. of dust or dirt in © the metallic media in such wise that it is not removed by the normal … does not, thereby, become enhanced in its air cleaning properties. 50.
383 U.S. 934Opposition — Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983
EPA to comply with three requirements con- cerning oral communications after the close of the comment period. … of the Clean Air Act....” 670 F.2d at 849.
463 U.S. 680Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Appalachian Power Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1974
STATUTES INVOLVED Section 111 of the Clean Air Act, as added, 84 Stat. … (2)(C), prior to promulgating new source emission standards as required by Section ILL of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.
416 U.S. 969Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1973
Sections 110, 304 and 307 of the Clean Air Act. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1857c-5, 1857-2 and 1857-5. 3. The “Complex Source” regulations promul- gated pursuant to the Clean Air Act, 38 Fed. … pursuant to Section 109 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.A
414 U.S. 989
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.