Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.09s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 24, 2025
EPA, 597 U.S. at 716 (cleaned up). … Air Regul. Grp. v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 4, 2022
EPA, 576 U.S. at 762 (Thomas, J., concurring) (cleaned up). … EPA, 576 U.S. at 761 (Thomas, J., concurring) (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Herman Avery Gundy, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 1, 2018
Sunstein, Is the Clean Air Act Unconstitutional?, 98 Mich. L. … Sunstein, Is the Clean Air Act Unconstitutional?, 98 Mich. L. Rev. 303, 332 (1999) (noting that Schechter’s nondelegation holding “has not been overruled even implicitly”).
Amicus Curiae Brief — CIC Services, LLC, Petitioner v. Internal Revenue Service, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 22, 2020
Y & H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 510 (2006) (cleaned up). … She found Treasury, even when issuing notice and soliciting comments, rarely complies with the APA’s requirements. Id. at 1748–50.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Indiana Gas Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Madison, Notes on the Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787, 319 (Norton 1987) (comments by Randolph). … Judiciary Act of 1789, Ch. 20, § 11-12, 1 Stat. 73, 78, 79.
525 U.S. 931Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 25, 2021
A Cranky History of Clean Water Act Jurisdiction, 44 FED. … The Clean Water Act and Sustainability, 47 U. RICH. L.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Unser v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
Some of these amendments expanded the scope of criminal liability by introducing lower or no intent crimes, such as mere “negligent” conduct under the Clean Air Act. /d. at 40. … The Clean Water Act has a similar provision.
528 U.S. 809Amicus Curiae Brief — Bay Area Laundry and Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. Ferbar Corp. of Cal.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (“MPPAA”). … In the case at bar, Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Fund v.
522 U.S. 192Amicus Curiae Brief — Pacific Merchant Shipping Ass'n v. Aubry
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
AWO's objectives and purposes are set forth in its Constitution and Bylaws as follows: (a) To maintain itself as a strong national association of carriers and act as the unifying body and definitive … For example, governing federal statutes specify that captains “may not work for more than 12 hours in a consecutive 24-hour period except in an emergency.” 46 U.S.C. 8104(h).
504 U.S. 979Amicus Curiae Brief — Arkansas v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Colorado strongly supports the concepts and goals expressed in the Clean Water Act ("CWA") and its amendments.’ … An opportunity for comment by another state is accorded.
503 U.S. 91Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 22, 2020
Comm., Order Adopting a Clean Energy Standard (Aug. 1, 2016), http://documents. dps.ny.gov/public/Common/ViewDoc.aspx? … ” to “meet from time to time for a discussion of matters of mutual concern affecting administration, development and use of the Trail,” and to each allow the other agency “opportunities to review and comment
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 18, 2022
E.P.A., Economic Analysis for the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification Rule at 9 (May 28, 2020), perma.cc/9LBT-ZMRM. … Water Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — James City County v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Members of the MWP hold Section 404 permits issued pursuant to the federal Clean Wate Act. The MWP are acutely aware of the Section 404(c) veto process under the Clean Water Act. … Water Act.
513 U.S. 823Amicus Curiae Brief — Michelle O’Connor-Ratcliff, et al., Petitioners v. Christopher Garnier, et ux.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 15, 2023
When an official gives his profile an air of 9 governmental legitimacy, the public comes to rely on it for state-provided information. … Brentwood, 531 U.S. at 295 (cleaned up). But that judicial obligation does not extend to ignoring key factors that indicate state action.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Arkansas v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Such a result is clearly contrary to the Clean Water Act. … The Clean Water Act’s designation of a U.S.
503 U.S. 91Amicus Curiae Brief — Scarborough v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1945
actually not cleaned at all. … A positive act of commission is naturally more easily recognized than a complex passive state of affairs wherein the act is one of omission.
326 U.S. 755Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006), a case addressing the scope of the Clean Water Act (CWA). … Rather than 16 supporting the Second Circuit’s holding, American Textile actually supports the validity of the EPA’s use of cost-benefit analysis under the relevant provision of the Clean Water Act
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 3, 2019
Congress enacted the Clean Water Act (CWA or Act), 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., to “restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters,” 33 U.S.C. 1251(a), while “recogniz … The EPA noted that federal courts had disagreed about the Act’s applicability to discharges through groundwater, id. at 7127-7128, and it requested comment from Tribes, States, members of the public, and
Amicus Curiae Brief — Arkansas v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Tallman, 380 U.S. 1 (1965).................... 8 STATUTES AND REGULATIONS: Clean Water Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. … Compliance With Federally-Approved Water Quality Standards Is The Paramount Objective Of The Clean Water Act.
503 U.S. 91Amicus Curiae Brief — Chicago v. Environmental Defense Fund
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Resource recovery facilities and incinerators must comply with strict emissions requirements promulgated pursuant to the Clean Air Act.** Moreover, EPA’s recent promulga- 10 The only potentially environmentally … OF that such discarded materials be disposed of . . . by [an] environ- mentally sound method of disposal, including incineration that does not conflict with the Clean Air Act.” H.R. Rep.
511 U.S. 328
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.