Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.13s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Army Corps of Engineers’ wetlands jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act. … Congress Designed the Clean Water Act to Regulate Discharges That Impact the Integrity of Navigable Waters.
547 U.S. 715Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska v. Southeast Alaska Alaska Conservation Council (No. 07-990)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
Requirements Imposed by the Clean Water Act and Agency Regulations. … Additionally, FWS and state wildlife agencies have authority to comment on section 404 permits pursuant to the Fish and _ Wildlife Coordination Act, 16 U.S.C. § 661, et seq.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
THE PROPER JURISDICTIONAL ANALYSIS UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT REQUIRES A SIGNIFICANT NEXUS WELL BEYOND THE MOST MINIMAL HYDROLOGICAL CONNECTION. A. Clean Water Act. … Congress responded to that dramatic event by enacting the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387 (“Clean Water Act”).
547 U.S. 715Amicus Curiae Brief — South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
The Clean Water Act Congress enacted the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Pub. L. … The Clean Water Act’s definitions support that conclusion.
539 U.S. 957Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 18, 2022
In addition, Appendix D is part of a guidance document that was created without public input pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act’s notice and comment requirements. … That decision addresses the scope of Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction over certain waters of the United States, including wetlands.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Federal Communications Commission, et al., Petitioners v. AT&T, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 25, 2026
According to the government, the carriers should have violated the FCC’s final orders by refusing to pay the forfeitures, allowed the Hobbs Act’s 60-day review period to lapse, and waited to see whether … Jarkesy, 603 U.S. at 123; see also Tull, 481 U.S. at 422–25 (civil penalties under the Clean Water Act were “punitive” and “traditionally available only in a court of law”).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 31, 2021
The Sacketts sought judicial review of an EPA compliance order that subjected them to the permitting requirements of the Clean Water Act. Sackett, 566 U.S. at 124; 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251–1387. … Hawkes involved a similar challenge to the Clean Water Act’s wetlands designation and permitting requirements. 136 S. Ct. at 1812–13.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. Army Corps of Engineers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
As interpreted by federal agencies, the Clean Water Act regulation at issue in this case is ! … , the decision did not prohibit the use of migratory birds to establish a connection to interstate commerce under the Clean Water Act.
531 U.S. 159Amicus Curiae Brief — Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Indiana Gas Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Madison, Notes on the Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787, 319 (Norton 1987) (comments by Randolph). … Judiciary Act of 1789, Ch. 20, § 11-12, 1 Stat. 73, 78, 79.
525 U.S. 931Amicus Curiae Brief — Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Bennett
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
The committee recognizes the importance of the testimony before it by numerous witnesses of the dangers of conflicting, *In the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., as well as the Federal We.ter … Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.. states were granted express authority to impose their own standards to regulate the emission of air and water pollutants respectively.
476 U.S. 1176Amicus Curiae Brief — Herman Avery Gundy, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 1, 2018
Sunstein, Is the Clean Air Act Unconstitutional?, 98 Mich. L. … Sunstein, Is the Clean Air Act Unconstitutional?, 98 Mich. L. Rev. 303, 332 (1999) (noting that Schechter’s nondelegation holding “has not been overruled even implicitly”).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 15, 2022
Ct. at 2604 (White House described Clean Power Plan as “aggressive transformation in the domestic energy industry”); Nat’l Fed’n of Indep. Bus. v. … Medicare Act and the APA.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Truck Insurance Exchange, Petitioner v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 31, 2024
Lujan, 504 U.S. at 560 (cleaned up). … S.D.N.Y. 1989) (cleaned up); see also In re Public Serv. Co. of N.H., 88 B.R. 546, 554 (Bankr.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 4, 2023
Ct. 2183, 2207 (2020) (cleaned up). … (cleaned up).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 18, 2022
E.P.A., Economic Analysis for the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification Rule at 9 (May 28, 2020), perma.cc/9LBT-ZMRM. … Water Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Gonzales v. Raich
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist., 124 S. Ct. 1756 (2004)... seeceeeseseneneeneees 1 Fry v. United States, 421 U.S. 542 (1975)...........ccccccseeeeeeees 4 Maryland v. … Ct. 2488 (2004), re- gional initiatives to promote clean air, Engine Mfrs. Ass’n v. South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist., 124 S. Ct. 1756 (2004), State wetland protections, Palazzolo v.
545 U.S. 1Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 22, 2020
Comm., Order Adopting a Clean Energy Standard (Aug. 1, 2016), http://documents. dps.ny.gov/public/Common/ViewDoc.aspx? … ” to “meet from time to time for a discussion of matters of mutual concern affecting administration, development and use of the Trail,” and to each allow the other agency “opportunities to review and comment
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 24, 2025
EPA, 597 U.S. at 716 (cleaned up). … Air Regul. Grp. v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006), a case addressing the scope of the Clean Water Act (CWA). … Rather than 16 supporting the Second Circuit’s holding, American Textile actually supports the validity of the EPA’s use of cost-benefit analysis under the relevant provision of the Clean Water Act
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 19, 2025
EPA, 598 U.S. 651, 708 (2023) (Thomas, J., concurring) (cleaned up). … Albert Abel, The Commerce Clause in the Constitutional Convention and in Contemporary Comment, 25 Minn. L.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.