Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.54s
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Locke
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
The Court also rejected the state’s argument that either the Clean Water Act or the Coastal Zone Management Act provided authority for states to regulate oil tankers. /d. at 178 n.28. … This Court upheld state laws "' See Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1321(02) (CWA) (providing that “[nJothing in this section shall be construed as preempting any State or political subdivision thereof
527 U.S. 1063Amicus Curiae Brief — South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., 138 S. Ct. 2080 (2018) (No. 17-494)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
The Act accordingly facilitated the creation of this case to create a clean vehicle through which the Court could consider whether the outdated physical presence rule still applies to the modern challenges … During this time period, total retail sales increased by only 0.5 percent.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 20, 2023
(cleaned up). Under Chevron (properly understood), Congress may not blindly pass the buck to agencies. … The dispute in that case was over what qualifies as a “major stationary source” of air pollution under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977.
Amicus Curiae Brief — U.S. Army Corp of Eng'rs v. Hawkes Co., 136 S. Ct. 615 (2015) (No. 15-290)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Water Act (“CWA” or “the Act”) regulation.! … PPG Indus., Inc., 446 U.S. 578 (1980) (recognizing a letter, written by an EPA Regional Administrator notifying PPG that their waste-heat boilers are subject to the Clean Air Act, is reviewable under
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2025
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA), as amended by the Energy Policy Act of 2005, embodies major policy decisions that Congress made to facilitate offshore wind energy development … Air Act to “substantially restructure the American energy market.” 597 U.S. at 724.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2025
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA), as amended by the Energy Policy Act of 2005, embodies major policy decisions that Congress made to facilitate offshore wind energy development … Air Act to “substantially restructure the American energy market.” 597 U.S. at 724.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, Petitioner v. E. Jean Carroll
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 11, 2025
But “[i]n the midst” of Carroll’s litigation against President Trump, “New York in May 2022 enacted the [Adult Survivors Act] which, in relevant part, created a one-year revival period, starting November … Thus, limitations periods “require plaintiffs to pursue diligent prosecution of known claims.” CTS Corp. v. Waldburger, 573 U.S. 1, 8 (2014) (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Torres v. Lynch, 135 S. Ct. 2918 (2015) (No. 14-1096)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
This Court explained there that, in administering the Clean Air Act, the Environmental Protection Agency is charged with “implementing policy decisions in a technical and complex arena.” 467 U.S. at … But unlike Section 1101(a\43), the Clean Air Act provision at issue in Chevron, “stationary source,” had no criminal applications.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District v. Friends of Milwaukee's Rivers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
The Seventh Circuit’s Decision is Contrary to the Clean Water Act and the Combined Sewer Overflow Policy............... 10 4 z OER RA AD OMAD ORI : V1. … THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT’S DECISION IS CONTRARY TO THE CLEAN WATER ACT AND THE COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW POLICY.
544 U.S. 913Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Locke
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
The Court also rejected the state’s argument that either the Clean Water Act or the Coastal Zone Management Act provided authority for states to regulate oil tankers. /d. at 178 n.28. … This Court upheld state laws "" See Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1321(0(2) (CWA) (providing that “[nJothing tie RENE Gens RE ee aes thereof from imposing any requirement or liability respect to the
529 U.S. 89Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 28, 2026
Nor does a State need such delegation to act. … Contaminated properties “can pose environmental exposure risks to community members via access to the sites or contamination of soil, air, and/or water at the site.”
Amicus Curiae Brief — Chicago v. Environmental Defense Fund
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Shimer, 367 U.S. 374 (1961)... .. 21 Statutes and regulations: Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Pub. L. No. i ah eesaeue 14 I a a awe 14 Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984, Pub. L. … Air Act Amendments of 1990, Pub.
511 U.S. 328Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 15, 2022
Earl, Cleaning Up After Federal and State Pollution Programs: Local Government Hazardous Waste Regulation, 17 Stetson L. … Gramling, III & William L. 7 Earl, Cleaning Up After Federal and State Pollution Programs: Local Government Hazardous Waste Regulation, 17 Stetson L. Rev. 639, 641 (1988).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska v. Southeast Alaska Alaska Conservation Council (No. 07-990)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387 ................... 1 Clean Water Act, Section 301 (33 U.S.C. … In Chevron, the statute at issue was the Clean Air Act, which regulated, but did not define, “stationary sources” of pollution, rather than the Clean Water Act.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2021
Even if the OSH Act permitted the agency to issue such an order, it must be done through normal notice-and-comment rulemaking—not an emergency temporary standard. … Air Transp. Ass’n of Am. v. DOT, 900 F.2d 369, 379 (D.C. Cir. 1990), vacated on other grounds, 498 U.S. 1077 (1991). The D.C.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2021
Even if the OSH Act permitted the agency to issue such an order, it must be done through normal notice-and-comment rulemaking—not an emergency temporary standard. … Air Transp. Ass’n of Am. v. DOT, 900 F.2d 369, 379 (D.C. Cir. 1990), vacated on other grounds, 498 U.S. 1077 (1991). The D.C.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2021
Even if the OSH Act permitted the agency to issue such an order, it must be done through normal notice-and-comment rulemaking—not an emergency temporary standard. … Air Transp. Ass’n of Am. v. DOT, 900 F.2d 369, 379 (D.C. Cir. 1990), vacated on other grounds, 498 U.S. 1077 (1991). The D.C.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2021
Even if the OSH Act permitted the agency to issue such an order, it must be done through normal notice-and-comment rulemaking—not an emergency temporary standard. … Air Transp. Ass’n of Am. v. DOT, 900 F.2d 369, 379 (D.C. Cir. 1990), vacated on other grounds, 498 U.S. 1077 (1991). The D.C.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Madeleine Pickens, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 19, 2023
Dep’t of Rev., 560 P.2d 21 (Alaska 1977) ...................................... 7 United Air Lines, Inc. v. … Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, Pub. L. No. 117-169 § 10301, 136 Stat. 1818, 1831 (2022).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Sturgeon v. Masica, 136 S. Ct. 27 (2015) (No. 14-1209)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
like the Clean Air Act and Water Pollution Control Act. … Federal laws and regulations of general applicability to both private and public lands, such as the Clean Air Act, the Water Pollution Control Act, U.S.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.