Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
1,645 results
0.58s
Agency decision · Agency decision
In making this.assertion, petitioner maintains that once the Colorado district court ordered him to máke monthly spousal maintenance and child support payments to Colleen Gloceri, he was "acting as an … Proc. 2003-61, 2003-2 C.B. 296, in view of the fact that the proposed revenhe proced re is not final and because the comment period under the notice only rec ntly closed." See also Diehl v.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
aware of the target’s status as a U.S. citizen, and if so, petitioner suggested that the target could not have knowingly surrendered U.S. nationality under any of the provisions related to expatriating acts … Transcript The WBO maintained a transcript that provides a chronological list of the actions taken by various WBO personnel in respect of petitioner’s claim, including comments related to those actions
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
the following: New entry for 2.25 hours devoted to forwarding this Court’s Notice of Filing of Notice of Appeal to the test case petitioners; 2 additional hours for “transcript search” for the Court’s comments … The 758.19 hours claimed for this period include 192.07 fee request hours, and the 88.575 hours disallowed for this period include 53.91 fee request hours. c. 2006 Izen’s time entries for 2006 amount
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
the following: New entry for 2.25 hours devoted to forwarding this Court’s Notice of Filing of Notice of Appeal to the test case petitioners; 2 additional hours for “transcript search” for the Court’s comments … The 758.19 hours claimed for this period include 192.07 fee request hours, and the 88.575 hours disallowed for this period include 53.91 fee request hours. c. 2006 Izen’s time entries for 2006 amount
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
the following: New entry for 2.25 hours devoted to forwarding this Court’s Notice of Filing of Notice of Appeal to the test case petitioners; 2 additional hours for “transcript search” for the Court’s comments … The 758.19 hours claimed for this period include 192.07 fee request hours, and the 88.575 hours disallowed for this period include 53.91 fee request hours. c. 2006 Izen’s time entries for 2006 amount
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
the following: New entry for 2.25 hours devoted to forwarding this Court’s Notice of Filing of Notice of Appeal to the test case petitioners; 2 additional hours for “transcript search” for the Court’s comments … The 758.19 hours claimed for this period include 192.07 fee request hours, and the 88.575 hours disallowed for this period include 53.91 fee request hours. c. 2006 Izen’s time entries for 2006 amount
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
the period required. . . . … Period for Filing Petition Extended in Certain Cases. (a) Period Extended.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
McWade selected "clean" cases; i.e., cases that did not include issues other than Kersting interest deductions. Mr. … The stated grounds were the expiration of the period of limitations for criminal prosecution of any acts of wrongdoing by Messrs. Sims and McWade and the OIG's prior investigation and report. J.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
McWade selected "clean" cases; i.e., cases that did not include issues other than Kersting interest deductions. Mr. … The stated grounds were the expiration of the period of limitations for criminal prosecution of any acts of wrongdoing by Messrs. Sims and McWade and the OIG's prior investigation and report. J.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
McWade selected "clean" cases; i.e., cases that did not include issues other than Kersting interest deductions. Mr. … The stated grounds were the expiration of the period of limitations for criminal prosecution of any acts of wrongdoing by Messrs. Sims and McWade and the OIG's prior investigation and report. J.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Petitioner additionally suffered physical problems during the period she was employed as a field supervisor. … This Release includes, without limitation, any claim arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and 1991, the Labor Management Relations Act, the Americans
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
We commented on the harshness of this rule in Scudder v. … Act of January 12, 1971, Pub. L. No. 91-679, 84 Stat. 2063 (codified at § 6013(e)). Relief got a little easier in 1984, see Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, Pub. L.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
the following: New entry for 2.25 hours devoted to forwarding this Court’s Notice of Filing of Notice of Appeal to the test case petitioners; 2 additional hours for “transcript search” for the Court’s comments … The 758.19 hours claimed for this period include 192.07 fee request hours, and the 88.575 hours disallowed for this period include 53.91 fee request hours. c. 2006 Izen’s time entries for 2006 amount
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
/NASA Doctorate Program, known as the Rare Diseases/Orphan Drug Research act. … On October 1, 2010, petitioner mailed to respondent a letter, dated September 24,.2010; titled "Final Comments!!!".
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
The Tax Reform Act of 1976 has essentially eliminated non-risk or non-recóurse notes. … - 101 - Thompson had a high school education but no college when he entered the Army Air Corps in 1942 at age 19.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
period" (sòfnetimes, simply, assessed amounts.) . … Inte cnal Revenue Service Restruc ur=ing and Reform Act of,1998 (the Act), Pub. L. 105-206, sec. 3401(b), -112 Stat. 747. 2676 105th Cong., 2d Sèss. (1998) when enacted, became, thetAct:. .
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
McWade selected "clean" cases; i.e., cases that did not include issues other than Kersting interest deductions. Mr. … The stated grounds were the expiration of the period of limitations for criminal prosecution of any acts of wrongdoing by Messrs. Sims and McWade and the OIG's prior investigation and report. J.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
McWade selected "clean" cases; i.e., cases that did not include issues other than Kersting interest deductions. Mr. … The stated grounds were the expiration of the period of limitations for criminal prosecution of any acts of wrongdoing by Messrs. Sims and McWade and the OIG's prior investigation and report. J.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
McWade selected "clean" cases; i.e., cases that did not include issues other than Kersting interest deductions. Mr. … The stated grounds were the expiration of the period of limitations for criminal prosecution of any acts of wrongdoing by Messrs. Sims and McWade and the OIG's prior investigation and report. J.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
McWade selected "clean" cases; i.e., cases that did not include issues other than Kersting interest deductions. Mr. … The stated grounds were the expiration of the period of limitations for criminal prosecution of any acts of wrongdoing by Messrs. Sims and McWade and the OIG's prior investigation and report. J.
United States Tax Court
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.