Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.13s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Allegany, New York v. United States (Nos. 91-558, 91-543, 91-563)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

    of 1954, 42 U.S.C. §2011 et seq. l Clean Air Act, as amended by the Clean Air Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. §1857 et seq. 13 Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seg. 8, 11, 14 Low-Level Radioactive … us The 1985 Amendments’ requirement that States own and possess radi- oactive waste is also far more intrusive on State dignity and power than the EPA's Clean Air Act regulations reviewed by three Courts

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Chevron Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. City of Oakland, California, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 11, 2021

    Materials Corp., 849 F.3d 1313 (11th Cir. 2017) ............................ 18 Statutes 28 U.S.C. 1292(b)....................................................... 21 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq … Id. at 107 n.9. 10 In AEP, this Court further held that because the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., regulates carbon dioxide emissions from stationary sources, Congress had displaced any right

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — New York v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

    of 1954, 42 U.S.C. §2011 et seq. l Clean Air Act, as amended by the Clean Air Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. §1857 et seq. 13 Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seg. &, 11, 14 Low-Level Radioactive … 'S ‘The 1985 Amendments requirement that States own and possess radi- oa live Waste is also far more intrusive on State dignity and power than the EPA's Clean Air Act regulations reviewed by three Courts

    505 U.S. 144
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — New York v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

    of 1954, 42 U.S.C. §2011 et seq. | Clean Air Act, as amended by the Clean Air Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. §1857 et seq. 13 Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seg. 8, 11, 14 Low-Level Radioactive … 'S The 1985 Amendments’ requirement that States own and possess radi- eactive waste is also far more intrusive on State dignity and power than the EPA's Clean Air Act regulations reviewed by three Courts

    502 U.S. 1023
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc., et al., Petitioners v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 3, 2026

    Hyatt, 587 U.S. at 238-39 (cleaned up). … In AEP, federal common law was displaced because Congress addressed both the conduct (source pollution) and the remedy (emission caps) in the Clean Air Act; there is no evidence that Congress has spoken

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Shell Oil Co. v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

    API's members have been identified as potentially responsible parties at contaminated sites across the country pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, … Likewise, the courts have imposed “operator” liability for violations of the federal Clean Air Act on parties based on a significant degree of control over a facility. See, e.g., United States v.

    537 U.S. 1147
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Laura Smith, as Duly Appointed Representative and Independent Administrator of the Estate of Andrea Manfredi, Deceased, et al., Petitioners v. The Boeing Company, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 11, 2025

    , the Ship Mortgage Act, the Suits in Admiralty Act, and the Public Vessels Act, and for actions to foreclose preferred ship mortgages.”) … (cleaned up); see also Curcuru v.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, 136 S. Ct. 890 (2016) (No. 15-415)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016

    The other exempts “any salesman primarily engaged in selling trailers, boats, or air- craft.” 29 U.S.C. 213(b)(10)(B). … pay mini- mum wages or overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended [29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.], the Walsh-Healey Act, or the Bacon- Davis Act, if he pleads and proves

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — UFO Chuting of Hawaii, Inc. v. Thielen (No. 07-1427)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

    Cal. 2006) (enjoining the federal government to pass Clean Water Act regula- tions within two years to address invasive species). … Goldstene, 517 F.3d 1108 (9th Cir. 2008) (Cali- fornia’s fuel regulation preempted by Clean Air Act). ll.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — National Ass'n v. Defenders of Wildlife

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

    , ee Oe in icrtnrnrnsineniiitininitanaciinniniiaeiaiaiiiiliaanaai 2 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, ee ee crciereriieitinicstiicsiitaninihitataitiageaiaiitamamaniiapiaas 2 Clean Air Act, … § 300(g2)a); Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §6947(a); Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7410(k)(3).

    551 U.S. 644
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Protection Agency v. Defenders of Wildlife

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

    , sO I icccnicscrnnsisciatitintrnnnamatenmeniidsdamiennsil 2 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, , A” Seon ee nee — Clean Air Act, I elaine lial 2 Water Pollution Control Act of 1948, > eh, … § 300(g\2)a); Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §6947(a); Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7410(k\(3).

    549 U.S. 1105
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Tony B. Jobe, Esquire, Petitioner v. National Transportation Safety Board

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 28, 2021

    Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 110 ................................... 9 Freedom of Information Act, Pub. … Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 110. 723 F.3d 1201, 1204, 1205, 1207 (10th Cir. 2013).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

    Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983) . 6 STATUTES AND REGULATIONS: Federal: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7543 ..... 8 Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1146 _. ee x … Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7543(a) (“relating to the control of [motor vehicle} emissions”).

    505 U.S. 88
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

    In September and November 1992 respondent was ordered to do clean-up work that was outside his job description. … Id. at 396 n.6 (quoting United Air Lines, Inc. v.

    536 U.S. 101
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — SD Warren Co. v. Maine Bd. of Environmental Protection

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

    The flow of water through a dam is not a “discharge” within the meaning of Section 401 of the Clean Water Act..........:ccccsesssseseseneseseeees 3 II. … BH TAU ccocrsnccnsecatesssnttnsiiinduidadaiimaaniines i, et passim Clean Water Act Section 402, 33 U.S.C. § 1342 Clean Water Act Section 404, 33 U.S.C. § 1344 OTHER MATERIALS 58 Fed.

    547 U.S. 370
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Hughes v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 940 (2018) (No. 17-155)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

    Army Corps of Engineers over the “waters of the United States,” a term of art used in the Clean Water Act. … Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc., 474 U.S. 121 (1985), in the case of Clean Water Act juris- diction.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Ferring B.V. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc. (No. 06-372)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

    They apply the maxim requiring clean hands only where some unconscionable act of one coming for relief has immediate and necessary relation to the equity that he seeks in respect of the matter in litigation … Air Freight System, Inc. v. NLRB, 510 U.S. 317 (1993).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority Authority Authority v. Friends of the Earth, Inc. (No. 06-119)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

    Circuit decision to some stakeholders for comments. This policy acknowledges the impact of the D.C. … EPA regulations since 1985 have been based upon the interpretation that TMDLs may be expressed in periods longer than a twenty-four hour period. 50 Fed. Reg. 1779, 1776 (Jan. 11, 1985); 64 Fed.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988

    Comments of the Air Transport Association of America to the FAA, Docket No. 25148 (“ATA Comments’’).* ATA proposes that the 7In its questions concerning “minimum” EAPs, the FAA asks, “How far should … ATA Comments at 3.

    486 U.S. 1014
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

    Air Act legislation and increasing competition from Western coal sources. … Pre-Coal Act History of Coal Industry Provided Rationale for Adoption of Coal Act A review of the history of the coal industry over the period of time from the 1940’s to the passage of the Coal Act

    524 U.S. 498

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.