Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.18s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Wisconsin v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
E.g., Federal Water Pollution Control Act (“Clean Water Act” or “CWA”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387; Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 300f-300j-26; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ( … “RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901-6992k; Clean Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7671q.
535 U.S. 1121Amicus Curiae Brief — Enernoc, Inc. v. Elec. Power Supply Ass'n, 135 S. Ct. 2049 (2015) (No. 14-841)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Max Zhang, Demand Response, Behind-the-Meter Generation and Air Quality, 49 Envtl. … Max Zhang, Demand Response, Behind- the-Meter Generation and Air Quality, 49 Envtl. Sci.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
No author begins on a clean slate. As Justice Brennan stated in Harper & Row Publishers v. … Air Pirates, 581 F.2d 751, 757 = Cir. 1978), cert. denied sub nom., O’Neill v.
510 U.S. 569Amicus Curiae Brief — Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Cir. 2005) ......... 18, 25 United Air Lines, Inc. v. Evans, 431 U.S. 553 (1977) 10, 22 Statutes: Civil Rights Act of 1964, Tit. … Accordingly, in such cases,“‘a new cause of ac- tion,’ carrying its own limitations period, ‘arises from the date each payment is missed.’” Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v.
550 U.S. 618Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
The issue presented is whether or not the Army Corp of Engineers have jurisdiction over Petitioners’ property under the Clean Water Act. … Water and Air Act (herein CWA) and that they would have to apply for a permit to discharge fill into the “waters of the United States”.
547 U.S. 715Amicus Curiae Brief — Atlantic Richfield Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
API’s members have been identified as potentially responsible parties at contaminated sites across the country pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, … Likewise, the courts have imposed “operator” liability for violations of the federal Clean Air Act on parties based on a significant degree of control over a facility. See, e.g., United States v.
537 U.S. 1147Amicus Curiae Brief — Florida v. Riley
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
Cooking was commonly performed outside the house, as were laundering and other cleaning tasks. … The FAA has established, as it was Charged to do, those altitudes which accommodate interests in air travel with air safety and physical intrusiveness.
488 U.S. 445Amicus Curiae Brief — Simkins Industries, Inc. v. Sierra Club
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
In calculating an ap- propriate civil penalty, the court observed that Simkins had failed to file DMRs during the 977-day period set forth in the Sierra Club’s complaint and that the Clean Water Act … + The Water Quality Act of 1987 amended the Clean Water Act’s civil penal- ty provisions to increase the maximum penalty to $25,000 per day.
488 U.S. 992Amicus Curiae Brief — Garcetti v. Ceballos
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7622 (2005) .............ccccceesseeeees 24 ES. … § 5851 (Energy Reorganization Act) (2005); 42 U.S.C. § 6971 (Solid Waste Disposal Act) (2005); 42 U.S.C. § 7622 (Clean Air Act) (2005); and 42 U.S.C. § 9610 (Superfund) (2005).
547 U.S. 410Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 20, 2023
The EPA claimed that the “vague language of an ancillary provision of the [Clean Air Act]” granted it authority to unilaterally demand “a shift throughout the 7 Available at bit.ly/2HyrFrP. 17 power grid … Comments of Andrew N.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C … Indeed, in General Motors, this Court recognized that, pursuant to section 555(b), the Environmental Protection Agency must approve a state’s revised implementation plan under the Clean Air Act “within
542 U.S. 55Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 16, 2021
Id. 8 Clean Air Act (“CAA”), which establish the limits to the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) authority and reserve the primary role of states in a system of cooperative federalism … Circuit’s strained interpretation of 42 U.S.C. § 7411(d) of the Clean Air Act (“Section 111(d)”). The D.C.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 20, 2024
Dep’t of Treasury, Comments and Suggested Changes on Section 1(3) of Subcomm. … Dep’t of Treasury, Comments and Suggested Changes on Section 1(3) of Subcomm. Draft, Technical Memorandum Re Draft of Proposed Bill to Amend the Federal Firearms Act (Mar. 18, 1963)).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
The Clean Water Act plays an indirect yet critical role in protecting these biodiversity values. C. … The Clean Water Act establishes a comprehensive scheme to eliminate water pollution and preserve aquatic ecosystems.
547 U.S. 715Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Max Zhang, Demand Response, Behind-the-Meter Generation and Air Quality, 49 Envtl. … Max Zhang, Demand Response, Behind- the-Meter Generation and Air Quality, 49 Envtl. Sci.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Clayvin Herrera, Petitioner v. Wyoming
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 20, 2018
XCVII (“The people shall have the right to clean air and water, freedom from excessive and unnecessary noise, and the natural, scenic, historic, and esthetic qualities of their environment; and the protection … I, § 27 (“The people have a right to clean air, pure water, and to the preservation of the natural, scenic, historic and esthetic values of the environment.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Herrera v. Wyoming, 138 S. Ct. 720 (2018) (No. 17-532)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
XCVII (“The people shall have the right to clean air and water, freedom from excessive and unnecessary noise, and the natural, scenic, historic, and esthetic qualities of their environment; and the … I, § 27 (“The people have a right to clean air, »ure water, and to the preservation of the natural, scenic, historic and esthetic values of the environment. Pennsylvania's public natura!
Amicus Curiae Brief — Rimini Street, Inc., Petitioner v. Oracle USA, Inc., et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 6, 2019
But machines break and need maintenance, so we take our cars to the mechanic or call the AC repairperson when the air conditioner dies on a sweltering August day. … Likewise, the Fifth Circuit found no patent infringement under the right-to-repair doctrine regarding a company that cleaned, resurfaced, and reassembled patented tubes that had become unusable due to
Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Allegany, New York v. United States (Nos. 91-558, 91-543, 91-563)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
of 1954, 42 U.S.C. §2011 et seq. l Clean Air Act, as amended by the Clean Air Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. §1857 et seq. 13 Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seg. 8, 11, 14 Low-Level Radioactive … us The 1985 Amendments’ requirement that States own and possess radi- oactive waste is also far more intrusive on State dignity and power than the EPA's Clean Air Act regulations reviewed by three Courts
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 11, 2021
Materials Corp., 849 F.3d 1313 (11th Cir. 2017) ............................ 18 Statutes 28 U.S.C. 1292(b)....................................................... 21 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq … Id. at 107 n.9. 10 In AEP, this Court further held that because the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., regulates carbon dioxide emissions from stationary sources, Congress had displaced any right
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.