Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Christopher Preston

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2021

wife's comment or ex-wife's comment that he was a child molester. … The testimony was the comment was made in anger.

Oral argument — Wright v. Estate of Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2011

Did she work for him during any of that period of time? When she performed, Mr. Johnson maintained, was self-employed as a garage mechanic in the city of St. … Louis, cooking and cleaning and doing housekeeping work, and that he wanted to move closer to her. There was no contrary evidence.

Oral argument — Bollinger v. Oregon State Board of Parole

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2003

Just to clean up a few quick points, counsel for the defendant seems to argue that there must be some clearly established law in the years that ensued since Harlow that is not what the law requires. … In deciding the second prong of immunity, it's not necessarily that the alleged acts of privilege were held unconstitutional. That's Malick v. Brown. That's also a Ninth Circuit 1995 case.

Oral argument — D.R.T.G. Builders v. OSHC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2021

OSHA sent the citation initially by certified mail in strict compliance with the Act. … And the reason for that is that under the Act, after 15 days of a citation being uncontested, it becomes a final order of the Commission, and the Commission has ruled that a delay of that time period is

Oral argument — Seitz-Patridge v. Loyola University of Chicago

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2011

All that was left was a ministerial act. … If she didn't act intentionally, she didn't commit plagiarism under Loyola's definition. He asked about comments Dr. Frankfeder made to Dr. Diaz, and the response was Dr.

Oral argument — Veliusv.Townshipof Hamilton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2011

So Farrar was a de minimis case, period. Correct. There was no reason for the majority to go that far because they said it's de minimis. … Just the whole way the case went down, there were two discrete acts of excessive force. Does that make it an unusual case?

Oral argument — Sheth v. Sab Tool Supply Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2013

She rendered one, and then after the deposition of the plaintiff's expert, she rendered a second opinion to try to clean up what she had said the first time. … Under the law, the entire compensation in that period of breach of duty should have been forfeited.

Oral argument — South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2024

To transform Kane Hoy into this new city, the developers needed permits under both the National Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act, and the Clean Water Act. … And in fact, you can't come up with one for a project that's going to be conducted over a multi-year period like this one.

Oral argument — Razim v. Erickson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2013

I think the trial court made some comment based on the facts that maybe there was no consortium to lose in this marriage at the time that the accident took place. … She did the cleaning. She hauled their child around.

Oral argument — Jay v. Globalfoundries U.S. In

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2019

In this case, readily available, he has to be able to use it within the time period by which he's asked to do this task. … Each of those times, the force that acted on the object primarily was gravity because it was dropped and it fell.

Oral argument — United States v. Louis Zacherle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2020

We're here today because the district court aired when it imposed $15,000 in restitution under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act, because the record lacks a sufficient, reliable causal link between … It can only be for a single act. And so that would be multiplicitous for it to be multiple offenses during that three-year period. And Mr.

Oral argument — NLRB v. JAG Healthcare Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 28, 2016

The bottom line is that, but for the NRB and the ALJ finding the comments to the employees about it's up to you whether you have a union, and the comments to Ms. … She would not be someone who would just decide out of thin air to terminate somebody. Well, there was no, with all due respect, Your Honor, there's no finding to that effect.

Oral argument — Palomar Medical Center v. Kathleen Sebelius

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2012

And so why wouldn't the Congressional Act trump the Secretary's regulations? … Clean Water Act inspectors that would go to all the plants and, you know, it's totally inadequate. I mean, do we have a situation like this here?

Oral argument — 50139) 50276) USA v. AU

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2006

So he wasn't around my client during a relevant period of time when I'm asking for some sort of proof of an affirmative act conduct. … What were the overt acts that were committed? What were the overt acts?

Oral argument — Dieter Riechmann v. Florida, Department of Corrections

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2019

He was constantly asking the witnesses for specificity with respect to timeframes and periods of time throughout the trial. … Richman a complete clean bill of health either. They interjected a significant amount of minimizing or some negative things as well. You're saying that the witnesses that Mr.

Oral argument — People v. Vilchiz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2013

The state did a very good job of keeping this a clean trial. My arguments are not with the state's behavior at all. My arguments are that Mr. … Wasn't there a period of time when Torres was with the truck alone and he slept in the truck and Mr. Vilches was gone for a significant period of time? That is Mr.

Oral argument — Vedder v. Continental Western Ins.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2012

Part of doing their work, driving around, cleaning ambulances, going to accident scenes, which she did, as alleged in the Kroger lawsuit. … And it was a period of time over 20, 30 years talking about asbestos liabilities when you have bodily injury throughout a long period of time for each individual claimant.

Oral argument — Garrido v. Arena

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2013

The defendant sent mailers and aired a television advertisement during the campaign for the 45th Ward aldermanic position. … So there was an approximate two-week period of time when action could have been taken if he chose to do so during the election, and he chose not to.

Oral argument — Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Kessler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2026

And there's no comment in the reply brief saying she wasn't served or wasn't aware of it. But on top of that, it's been sort of the whole issue the whole time. … Air Doctor has nothing to do with diversity. There's no state court. It's the Latham Act, a federal court. There's no discussion of diversity, no discussion of California law.

Oral argument — Kenneth Dickerson v. DC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2023

That discretion would be in the context of the No Child Left Behind Act. … And it's the plaintiff's view that that particular act says when you are making this structural decision, unlike a reorganization, but a structural decision in the context of that act, that act attributes