Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.27s
Oral argument — In re: GPMI, Co.
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 25, 2023
But if they're acting actively to market it, and anybody, including your client, could engage in those discussions, what's the problem? … But that requirement is kind of being pulled out of thin air. They don't cite any cases where that is required. And, in fact, LaSalle expressly stopped short of saying that that was required.
32 min of audioOral argument — Midwest Fence Corporation v. TRAN
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2016
How quickly are they obliged to digest that information and act upon it? … Well, the truth of the matter is that the board hasn't even had an opportunity to act on this piece of information.
82 min of audioOral argument — Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Kessler
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2026
And there's no comment in the reply brief saying she wasn't served or wasn't aware of it. But on top of that, it's been sort of the whole issue the whole time. … Air Doctor has nothing to do with diversity. There's no state court. It's the Latham Act, a federal court. There's no discussion of diversity, no discussion of California law.
27 min of audioOral argument — Petersen Energia Inversora, S.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2017
So during the entire time period that the plaintiffs are complaining about here, Your Honor, YPF is not actually acting—is not the majority shareholder. … If they had said that, then I imagine this would only be proceeding in Spain or in Buenos Aires. Why didn't they? Well.
39 min of audioOral argument — U.S. Dept. of Labor v. Grayson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2004
Before I address any of the comments made, I want to make a couple of observations. … What they said was there were some errors that would be cleaned up later. That's all the record really shows.
23 min of audioOral argument — Jason Gowen v. Gerald Winfield
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2024
Not only was it much closer in time, but there was a specific act that showed up. What about the ringleader comment? So you want to be a ringleader, huh? We've got a place for ringleaders. … It's not that I acted violent, it's because I complained.
40 min of audioOral argument — Joyce Vallone v. CJS Solutions Group, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2021
It would be bad precedent for this court to allow an employer to define whatever it considers to be the period of employment to evade the hours worked regulation. … The Portal-to-Portal Act does not apply here because the Portal-to-Portal Act deals with ingress to egress on a same working day within a plant.
32 min of audioOral argument — Michael White v. Illinois State Police
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2021
And in the spirit of trying to do that, we believe the, the act has a five and seven year, um, uh, period, and we're not challenging that those are unreasonable. We think those could be good guides. … The act itself doesn't say that, but it's in the application of the act and, and the, um, what is it about the application as applied to your client that says he could never come back and apply again?
48 min of audioOral argument — William Fitzgerald v. County of Orange
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2014
The speaker guidelines stop at the words, speakers shall refrain from engaging in personal and pertinent slanderous or profane remarks, period. … I'm sorry, I didn't mean to interrupt, but your comments, your question, those comments, the heed my words, that was said right there face to face. Thank you.
37 min of audioOral argument — Martin v. Hubbard
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 14, 2006
We look at something like 300 cases in a six-month period of time that cited In re Clark or In re Robbins out of almost 3,000 cases. … So, which I submit was a reiteration, a cleaned-up version of what had been previously submitted. Counsel says that it hadn't been previously raised, and we disagree on that.
32 min of audioOral argument — People v. Hughes
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2011
I think the judge just snatched something out of the air which was inapplicable. And so I got this idea from my opponent. That was their alternative argument. … What's the whole point of this act is to treat these people so they can regain their mental health. If they're sitting in a county jail.
36 min of audioOral argument — Nawal Ali v. BC Architects Engineers, PLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2025
section 1927 In looking at the case law I'm sorry, so we don't have to decide, let me put it this way When I look at the statute, it does sort of look to me like you need some kind of an affirmative act … to Check the record On that Okay But he Awarded it From was And again We have a rule 60 motion That's pending Before you Wanted to ask That you grant That as well To allow the District court Judge to Clean
46 min of audioOral argument — Pro-Life Mississippi v. Lindsay Horton, et
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2015
And how many threats to your plaintiff people, and how many not threats, but actual arrests during this period of time? … The police said they were acting reasonably. They say they weren't acting reasonably. You say, well, the record shows that they were acting reasonably.
46 min of audioOral argument — 04-10619 United States v. S Whiteaker
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2007
I've never seen a judge make that kind of a comment during an open court at a hearing questioning a law enforcement officer's integrity. He certainly would be quite frank with you. … There is certainly an evidence code section which states that if a person acts a certain way and has a habit or custom, that that can be introduced to show that on this occasion he acted in conformity
49 min of audioOral argument — People v. Celis
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 26, 2022
He is waving his hand in the air. So you can see he is not armed in any manner. He veers away from the defendant. … Either Jonathan was acting in justified self defense, as I've argued, or he was acting with either unreasonable self defense, or as an act of revenge.
58 min of audioOral argument — D.R.T.G. Builders v. OSHC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2021
OSHA sent the citation initially by certified mail in strict compliance with the Act. … And the reason for that is that under the Act, after 15 days of a citation being uncontested, it becomes a final order of the Commission, and the Commission has ruled that a delay of that time period is
40 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Christopher Preston
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2021
wife's comment or ex-wife's comment that he was a child molester. … The testimony was the comment was made in anger.
25 min of audioOral argument — Jay v. Globalfoundries U.S. In
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2019
In this case, readily available, he has to be able to use it within the time period by which he's asked to do this task. … Each of those times, the force that acted on the object primarily was gravity because it was dropped and it fell.
25 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Louis Zacherle
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2020
We're here today because the district court aired when it imposed $15,000 in restitution under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act, because the record lacks a sufficient, reliable causal link between … It can only be for a single act. And so that would be multiplicitous for it to be multiple offenses during that three-year period. And Mr.
22 min of audioOral argument — United States v. VEGA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2004
I believe that's the way it should be, but the courts aren't going to agree with me no matter how much I air that out. Excuse me. … For example, was somebody acting as a lookout based on their expert experience? Was somebody engaging in counter-surveillance? Was Mario acting as a supplier? Correct. Was Mario acting as a supplier?
49 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.