Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.40s

  • Oral argument — James Hayes v. Accretive Health, Incorporated

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2014

    The PSLA, the Reform Act, doesn't require that. There's no law that requires that. Anything close to that, there's no authority for it. This would be the first time that that rule would be announced. … I think it's a misapprehension to say that the claims and potential merit of them were not aired out. They were.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In Re: Foreign Exchange Bench

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2019

    Class counsel talk about the fact that even after nine defendants settled, there were still six additional defendants that held out for an additional period of time. … I believe her comment was the risk decreased with each successive settlement.

    23 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Edwin Johnson v. CFTC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2023

    Now we're done and we're back on a clean slate, and I can come in as a first provider of information. But the commission doesn't see it that way. … He acted on that and he relied upon that. Much to his detriment, he incurred expense by bringing in his own counsel.

    21 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Northern Plains v. US Land Mngt.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2004

    Another source of restrictions is the Federal Land Policy Management Act. … Evidently, they decided back before the limitations period that is open to you to challenge that small-scale development is necessary in order to tell whether the methane is there in sufficient quantities

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Klein v. City of San Clemente

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2008

    And I don't recall it with sufficient detail to comment on it. All right. Okay? Okay. Thank you very much. Thank you. … Again, where you're leaving a sign up for long periods of time. I'm not quite sure what the issue is.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — CAE Integrated v. Moov Technologies

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2022

    We are four years past the period when Mr. Meisner stopped working for CAE. No non-compete would be enforceable for that period of time. … As to balance of the equities, it is perfectly clear that to get equity, you must come to the court with clean hands, and quite simply, CAE does not. Mr.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — TRAVINKO v. GONZALES

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2005

    And otherwise you're telling us, well, just throw it up in the air. Yeah, but the other attorney didn't respond at all. … We have to cover the whole period. So I'm trying to find out how you're covering the whole period, as Judge Fletcher was trying to find out.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. ARMANDO-MENDOZA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 16, 2006

    I would like to see if you would like to comment on that, if you would like to comment on that. And what does the case stand for? … One statement from a cold record that I apologize for everything in the government's position is not sufficient to overcome the clear air standard here.

    26 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jane Doe v. John Kelly

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2017

    They can't clean themselves properly. That presents an intolerable risk to the detainee population. Again, the spread of diseases. It's also just it's not humane. … Well, actually, I don't think that time period is overstated because of record-keeping issues.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Larremore

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2025

    I think get your bolt cutter still leaves it very much up in the air whether Mr. Laramore is consenting to a search of the trailer. Is it a type of consent for him to say, bring your dog? … And after the hang on for a second comment, pick it up again there and go through his observation of the open container.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Oliver v. Isenberg

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2020

    I thought I saw him — The three of them had a shareholders' meeting each year where they went over and then they ratified the acts. … The cases they cite, I call them the clean break cases. Someone says, you know, I'm going to leave. I won't talk to a client.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — GEFT Outdoors, LLC v. City of Westfield

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2019

    I mean, we don't presume that the United States Congress acts unconstitutionally or that the Indiana legislature. … Even if the district court had determined that GEFT did come to court with clean hands, GEFT did not establish its entitlement to the preliminary injunction it sought.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Exide Technologies v. IBEW, Local No. 700

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2020

    That is entitled Human Resources Policies and Procedures Family Medical Leave Act. … Exide gave the employees, I think, a 90- or 120-day period where there were no points or anything like that because Unum needed to get its act together, and they finally did.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Pamela Alloway

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2021

    Gibson, the court appreciates your willingness to accept the appointment in this case under the Criminal Justice Act, and you may proceed. Thank you, Your Honor. … They came in through the, what they call a mud room, which is a little porch where farmers clean the mud off of their boots coming out of the fields.

    26 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Lopez v. USA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 24, 2026

    We have a walking psychologist cleaning. That is for a special population, for veterans who serve this country. Most of them, big number of them have a PTSD. … If it's a bench trial, there is no jury trial under Tort Claim Act against US.

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Chiang v. FBI

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2008

    In this case, they suspended Agent Chang for a period of about eight months and then brought her back. With pay? With pay. Okay. That's probably the real defense in this case, not national security. … But granted that they use it, they cleaned it up with the Picard memo, which said we're not going to punish her for – or anyone in the FBI for failing a polygraph. That's in the record.

    26 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Trustees of Columbia v. Symantec Corporation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2018

    And then the claims would be directed at monitoring when a group of computers, all of which are already infected with a worm, act in a way that differs from how an already infected computer acts. … And their expert does say, and I'll just quote the language, it is sometimes difficult to find clean, attack-free training sets for training an intrusion detection model.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Int.'l Padi, Inc. v. Diverlink

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2005

    But the thing is, during the relevant time period of creation, inception, development, he was all over this thing. He co-developed it. … The Communications Decency Act was only one of them, specifically claiming that the Communications Decency Act barred all the claims against Diverlink.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Eric Bard

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 28, 2022

    That's all that brought it into the time period to consider for a career offender. … I did not think that the defense counsel invited that comment when the question was simply whether Hart had witnessed the events of October 21st in person.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Smith

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2015

    You know, as I said, you know, if it was in some way air, it should be considered. … I don't believe it does so because that has been modified to specifically say that can combine to do an unlawful act such as committed first degree murder.

    53 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.