Documents

Oral argument — North East Medical Serv. Inc. v. CA Dept. of Health Care Serv.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2017

Either one is more than adequate front clean hands, and I'm sorry, I think it's fraud too. … This is a settlement under the False Claims Act.

Oral argument — Lance McNeal v. Gary Kott

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2014

And he'd also gotten an in-cell urinal prior to April 2 for a brief period. He did, Your Honor. … I'm struggling with why we don't have a dispute of material fact as to whether Cott was acting in good faith to maintain discipline, or frankly, acting either maliciously or sadistically to refuse to allow

Oral argument — Xengxai Yang v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2024

So you have only a period of a month and a half. This is noted in Dr. … And after that period of a month and a half, you see from the prison records, which were summarized in Dr.

Oral argument — People v. Stone

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2013

Well, it's an equitable doctrine, so you have to come to the court with clean hands. … For your comments today.

Oral argument — Tamela Muir v. Decatur County, Iowa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2018

the basis that the sheriff's termination of Muir was in violation of any kind of settled law certainly Singleton in this circuit and most certainly in other circuits where it seems to be ball up in the air … well I believe they did in Wingate and I believe they didn't Skolski correct for marital association I believe well is there speech involved in here or not directly well he was she was let go because of comments

Oral argument — United States v. Pe

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2016

And he doesn't have a lawyer during that period in which he's waiting to be transported up. Yes, sir. And it's in a much less critical stage of the proceedings. … There's a lot in the air. So wouldn't the fairest thing to do be to send it back to the judge? What would be wrong with doing that?

Oral argument — United States v. Senke

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2020

Sinke was convicted did not require a sexual act, only the intent to perform that sexual act, and when Mr. Sinke was apprehended, he had condoms and lubricant. I understand that. … So why shouldn't this be subject to a proper airing at an evidentiary hearing rather than our reversing based on his word for it?

Oral argument — First and Beck v. Bank of Southwest

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2007

I didn't understand after the apostrophe in the court's comment. … I mean, you just don't pull it out of the air.

Oral argument — Rodney Pierce v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2024

to the success of this wonderful landmark piece of legislation that is the Voting Rights Act. … This court, this court's analysis of the evidence and of whether the district court clearly aired is supposed to look at the whole.

Oral argument — Naixiang Lian v. Natlie D'Amico

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2022

Danner had been able to gather in that 72-hour period? … I won't comment on whether it's... Seven placements. Seven placements. I mean, maybe it's not bounced, but let's say was placed multiple times in successive care.

Oral argument — TRAVINKO v. GONZALES

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2005

And otherwise you're telling us, well, just throw it up in the air. Yeah, but the other attorney didn't respond at all. … We have to cover the whole period. So I'm trying to find out how you're covering the whole period, as Judge Fletcher was trying to find out.

Oral argument — VISTAN CORPORATION v. FADEI USA, IN

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2013

Now, the specification discloses three alternative embodiments of that Act of Assembly and the actuator included in it. … Of course, I'll leave my comments to the conditional prosecutor.

Oral argument — 23-1290_23-1299_NLRB v. Colart_Staff Mgmt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2024

Why isn't the significance of cases like Starbucks or Lancaster-Fairfield County Hospital, or the Fourth Circuit's decision in LRB versus air contact transport, that there is a different standard for the … What do we do with the board's footnote five where it indicates, even if Hargrove was not actually engaged in constricted activity, that Colart apparently thought that he was and that Trejo's comments

Oral argument — United States v. Xianbing Gan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2022

Not that it was somebody else that committed those acts or that those acts did not, in fact, constitute money laundering or anything like that. … But again, he also made comments in closing argument. And I just went while I was listening and pulled it, and I point Your Honors to page 54 of the defense closing.

Oral argument — Anderson v. Warner

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2005

Anderson made some comment about Rodney King and then when more people converged on him, Mr. Warner got behind him and put him in a chokehold and told him that just to be quiet and not say anything. … I'm trying to make it clean in this respect. So I'm not asking you to agree to this set of facts. Someone impersonates a police officer, dresses up in the uniform of a police officer.

Oral argument — Pierce v. City of New York

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2020

In order for the Fourth Amendment to attach, there needed to be an intentional act because seizures are intentional as this court has long held and recently reaffirmed in Dancy. … And plaintiff's version was that he, in fact, was put into the air and he landed on the hood of the car and then slid to the ground.

Oral argument — Love v. McDonough

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2024

If they don't act on the request, then you can ask for a mandamus to force them to act on it. And if you do appeal it, then under Rule 8, you can ask that the payments continue pending appeal. … The reason we're here today is because we don't have that option because of how the board has acted.

Oral argument — Carl Leeper v. Alliance Resource Partners

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2019

The Court's legal conclusions were air and should be reversed for two reasons. … So what the court did was apply a six-month waiting period under 2101A6A, the termination piece, and applied a six-month waiting period to determine whether or not you are employed, whether or not you

Oral argument — Noe Silva v. San Pablo Police Department

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2020

We acted lawfully. We acted constitutionally. We did nothing wrong. So... As a formal matter, were the officers represented by an attorney when they were being deposed? … That would be stronger evidence of policy, but if Rosales says, and I'm paraphrasing so it's not quite so clean as this, but if Rosales says, I read what happened, I know everything about what happened

Oral argument — BENCOMO v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2012

He might try to clean it up a little bit, but, quite honestly, that he had already made a sworn false statement. … What happened is, 935 was an informant for ICE for a relatively short period of time, 2002 to 2003. She then gets deactivated, but she stays in the drug business independently.