Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.36s
Oral argument — Obie v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2025
And the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, in the findings at the opening, Congress says that religiously neutral acts can interfere with the exercise of religion as much as purposeful acts. … And what he says is, I'm quoting here, if the CFTC cleans up its act, ends its culture of retaliation, and stops trying to ban prayer, I will consider a return.
24 min of audioOral argument — David Adams v. Palm Beach County
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2024
These workers, our plaintiffs, delivered golf carts, cleaned them, maintained the grounds, retrieved balls, set the golf carts up, and otherwise interacted with the customers of the golf course and provided … Well, the, I guess the public agencies are entitled to use volunteers and to provide them reasonable, um, benefits, uh, that are not compensation covered by the act, uh, that's an exception.
32 min of audioOral argument — Gerasi v. Gilbane Building Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2017
in comment B. … But if somebody routinely performs negligent acts and never causes damage or injury, does that eliminate the negligent act the time it does cause an injury?
65 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Shanin Moshiri
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2016
He had been, for five years, operating lawfully with a clean frame of mind, in good faith. And then Mr. … This is where the Taj Mahal comment comes in. Well, there's two conversations, one in February and one in March. Well, the Taj Mahal comment comes back when Mr. Poirot closes the trap.
27 min of audioOral argument — Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Angewand v. Sirius XM Radio Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 13, 2022
And we believe the arising under requires more of a direct length, not a one step or a two step remove from the underlying act. … There was an award of attorney's fees and also a conditional fee of, I think, $20,000 if the arbitration didn't occur within a specific time period.
23 min of audioOral argument — Peterson Brothers v. Lexington Ins. Co.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2007
And the reason being is that that is not a protected act. The employee did not have, had not tested positive for drugs, was not in a rehab program. … Ciaz's use of drugs, illegal drugs, which is an intentional act.
26 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Joshua Elkins
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2012
here in support of his motion to dismiss reflect an exact, basically the same frequency of reporting, 90 days, lifetime duration, which again under SORNA could be knocked down to 25 years if he has a clean … Elkins was traveling, perhaps for an extended period of time, but traveling nonetheless, perhaps not moving.
22 min of audioOral argument — Yochanan Markman v. Whole Foods Market, Inc., et a
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2018
This is a suit under the Exchange Act, right? Yes, it is. And the PSLRA, yes. What specifically is the claim with respect to the accuracy of the financial statements? There is a claim about that. … He was Whole Foods' designate throughout the California investigation, which started before the class period and continued through the class period.
42 min of audioOral argument — People v. Miki
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2020
The evidence showing that she would sit with the defendant and his family at church during that time period. The fact that she would go to his house. … When the sexual conduct occurred and the trial court aired in finding him guilty. Thank you. I have no other comments. Thank you, Justice bridges. Do you have any questions. I do not. Thank you.
46 min of audioOral argument — XL Specialty Insurance Company v. Progressive Casualty Insurance
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2010
In that case, we would reserve the remaining period of time and allow Excel to argue the coverage issues as that is their appellate issue. All right. Very well. Thank you very much. Counsel? … Well, that's up in the air. I don't know exactly. The helicopter's on the ground. To be refueled.
30 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Ralph Redd
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2013
Yes, that in this particular I mean, the evidence was overwhelming that he had an opportunity to observe her for a substantial period of time. Depending on They lived together. … But is that significant at all, in other words, the fact that it was in evidence, as opposed to a prosecutor just sort of picking an argument out of the air somewhere? No, I don't think so.
26 min of audioOral argument — Trudell Medical International Inc. v. D R Burton Healthcare, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2024
He never submitted an expert report, period, in this case on the issue of non-infringement. But even if you assume that these declarations that I'm sure D.R. … The kinds of comments that he made. Has the Fourth Circuit looked at him in particular making the same kinds of comments in another case? Yes.
29 min of audioOral argument — Chicago Recycling Coalition v. City of Chicago Department of Street & Sanitation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 29, 2023
May it please the Court, this case comes under the Freedom of Information Act, which the General Assembly declared is fundamental to the American Constitutional form. … And so as a result, you then don't have to comply with the FOIA request because, you know, as far as you're concerned, your hands are clean. You don't have it.
56 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Duane Underwood II
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2024
did an act, say burglary, with the carrying of a weapon. … Do you have any comment on the 924C arguments? Most of the cases have to do with violence and this is a drug case.
34 min of audioOral argument — Nightingale v. National Grid USA Service Company Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2024
It does not mean that two unfair acts have to occur. … It does not mean that there has to be an unlawful act, which is the Section 2 violation, then another unlawful act, which is the Section 9 injury.
31 min of audioOral argument — Houston SportsNet Finance, LLC v. Houston R
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2016
in its interests as a creditor, was acting instead for anti-competitive reasons. … And in fact, Comcast was exclusively the party that aired the network. No other party was airing the network during that period of time. So Comcast got the benefit. Meanwhile, what did the teams get?
43 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Walter Mabry
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2020
We submit that that isn't a judge Friedman certainly did not air in concluding that it was not a show of authority. … And I don't think that, you know, the unilateral act of the person on the sidewalk renders what would otherwise be a consensual encounter to a non-consensual one. I just have a technical question.
43 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Edwards
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2025
run or have already run for considerable periods of time? … And therefore, there is this air of an unusual sequence of events in the listing of hearings.
44 min of audioOral argument — Betty Flythe v. DC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2015
See, that's- In Tulin, the officer was- the officers were acting within the scope of their employment. All the officers were acting within the scope of their employment. … He said – first of all, he said Fleiss jumped in the air and made this turn, right? And changed his momentum. Jumped in the air and changed his momentum. Correct. That's number one, right? Correct.
56 min of audioOral argument — White Communications v. Synergies3 Tec Services
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2021
Can you fix it when you have an operating loss for a substantial period of time? How do you fix that? There was no evidence of an business, lost revenues. I don't, I didn't just lost revenues. … Was it aired to rely on Scott or not? Um, I don't believe so.
32 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.