Documents

Oral argument — Fox Moraine, LLC v. United City of Yorkville

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2011

There was public comment to that effect. … If they don't act within that 180-day period, the application is deemed approved by operation of law, by the landfill siting statute.

Oral argument — Stanly v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2016

And as the commission and courts have ruled many times and found many times, an aggravation of an underlying condition is compensable under the Act. … We paid for the surgical treatments, even though in the surgery, they did some cleaning up, but there was no significant injury to the knee that was noted in any of the findings.

Oral argument — United States v. Rossi Adams, II

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2021

It's also Jenks Act, so that they have it, they can cross-examine the witnesses and the like, so these were, to our view, very clearly used in the prosecution. … Section 1920 does not include the cost of investigation leading to indictment period. Doesn't that bind us regardless of what you think or I think? Your Honor, again, I think it is general language.

Oral argument — United States v. Christopher Yates

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2024

The problem with the other co-conspirator statements are that a lot of times they aren't tethered to a time period. But this is a preponderance standard. … You have a brief comment to make. Go ahead. That certainly cannot be the law. That would limit a finding of ice or actual methamphetamine only to seize drugs and controlled purchases.

Oral argument — Finisar Corp v. DirecTV Group

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2008

That is programming that, like turnaround programming, is just beamed through the air. It's not downloaded under our construction of that term requiring retention. … Well because the overarching goal of JXE when it describes teletext is to accomplish the transmission of the most possible material within the shortest period of time.

Oral argument — Orantes-Barrera v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2012

It's like we're resetting the clock, wiping the slate clean. That testimony never happened. He was giving her an additional chance to sort of rehabilitate her testimony, I believe. … And also, I think, I mean, you could comment to this, but as I was reading it, the IJ made a finding.

Oral argument — United States v. Jamal A. Adams also known as Ishmeal Heru-bey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2018

The government's asking the court even to use plain air standard on that. … And it would have been- that one would have been under the plain air standard.

Oral argument — Cramblett v. Midwest Sperm Bank, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2017

Count 2 was a claim for violation of Illinois' Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Count 4 was for violation of the Federal Magnuson Moss Act. … It dealt with an air show, I think, in the McLean County area. But the converse is also true, Your Honor. There is no case which prohibits it.

Oral argument — United States v. Robinson (USA)

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2026

There's not as clean of a fit between the border search exceptions purposes and digital contraband. … And so that is the guidance that was provided to agents, and the agents in this case were acting according to that guidance.

Oral argument — Torres v. Peoria Park District

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 31, 2024

And these air fat questions. This is a summary judgment case. These air fat questions. They have to be strictly construed against the defendant. … These air back questions that the facts are not in dispute.

Oral argument — State of Louisiana v. i3 Verticals

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2023

instance of failure to act that is specifically outlined in 48J. … That is a specific act that starts and stops. That's not a continuing tort.

Oral argument — Clean Water Opportunities, Inc v. The Willamette V

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2018

Within a short period of time, EPS goes down to $12.95, which is substantially below what the defendants were charging. … You undertake acts to maintain your monopoly.

Oral argument — Washington v. Sunflower County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2024

The district attorney, was that your comment, Your Honor? … Just right out of thin air? That's not anything in the complaint that they were having a discussion about the bids.

Oral argument — United States v. Kenneth Olsen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2012

It was a unique time period It was right it occurred actually right before 9-11 So the United States did have the requirement to prove that he possessed it with the intent to use it as a weapon and I want … They were sent to clean out the defendants cubicle They found these items. They touched them with bare hands. They picked them up.

Oral argument — Purcell v. New York Institute

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2019

And then all the other comments come in either from either named harassers who don't comment onto the scene until later or from unnamed faculty members. Yes, although we did receive the texts. … Who was the fellow who commented about he wouldn't want to get in the car, but it was broken? Was that the same guy who also said something back in the earlier period? I believe so.

Oral argument — Atanda v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2011

But in this case, and as the court noted in Perez-Mejia in its new footnote, oftentimes there's not clean pleadings and evidentiary stage, but it's all mixed together. … Could you just comment on that, please? Yes, Your Honor. Whether he understood – it seems clear that he understood the question. This is an educated man. He was a comptroller for a hospital.

Oral argument — US ex rel. Mark McGrath v. Microsemi Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2017

are affected here are extremely sensitive government, for example, GPS guidance for missiles, electronics that allow an individual who's behind enemy lines to be located by the United States Army, the Air … as opposed to the fact that was potentially accessible for the period of time.

Oral argument — Anthony v. Saul

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2025

The fact that there was the agency keeps referring to this three-month period between the time that she applied and the time that her date last insured expired and acts as if that doesn't mean we can't … look at any medical evidence after that time period.

Oral argument — United States v. Eligio Munoz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2022

That allowed a grace period, and that grace period expired on January 1, 2019. … The defendant's possession of the item in his car with two other firearms that he was in possession of, and the finding by the district court that that is ownership is not clear air.

Oral argument — United States v. Parrish Kappes

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2014

And that brings me back to the plein air on all of these issues. Why was there not an objection on any of these issues in the district court? They're in the PSR. … Hartslow, do you think that's an ageism comment? I do. I do. I do. You don't have to answer it. No. Thank you. Mr. Hillis. Thank you.