Documents

Oral argument — Starns v. Obenland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 23, 2019

So the trial court did cite the rawhide versus satellite air and land services case. In that case, it's clearly distinguishable from the facts you have in this case. … As for any of these issues, it could have been cleaned up if there were questions that there weren't.

Oral argument — Melissa Bediako v. American Honda Finance

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2013

And that provision states that this three-year limitation period applies to every cause of action in Maryland unless another limitations period, a more specific limitations period, applies to the transaction … But, yeah, Honda, I don't think Honda Finance can go into court or anybody acting for Honda Finance can go into court.

Oral argument — Mahanoy Area School Dist. v. B. L.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2021

We look at the particular comments made here. … Cole said the case law allows us to act like Soviets and the North Koreans.

Oral argument — Windt v. Qwest Comm

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

The judge made a fundamental mistake both as to the existence of the proceedings that he commented on because he was dead wrong about that in terms of judging. … Well, actually, it's an important question because, of course, Judge Brown, Judge Brown was aired on the side of caution and assumed that the case would improve the RICO for precisely that reason.

Oral argument — In re: SCHULTZ

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 23, 2019

I'd like to address Your Honor's first comment about the lack... Yeah, I saw you react to that. You thought there was admissible evidence. I've actually brought an exhibit on PACER. … What was the motivating factor for doing an act of abandonment?

Oral argument — Gilmore v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2005

This is an administrative search, period. This is not a Terry search. … And this court has made that clear in Nevada Airlines and in San Diego Air Sports Center. There has to be a showing of an order. No, that there does not need to be.

Oral argument — International Union of Operating Engineers v. Illinois Labor Relations Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2015

I'm going to hope that my comments are not taken out of context. How much deviation are you speaking about? Quite a bit. We'll monitor it. Go ahead, please. … for purposes of the act.

Oral argument — Andres Dominguez v. City of Scottsdale

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2023

The officer was in the act... It's a fluent act of the officer getting him out of the vehicle and onto the ground so they can get him in handcuffs. At no point did Mr. … He ignored every single comment or every single command by the officer. The officer had absolutely every right to order him out of the car and for him to be out of the car.

Oral argument — IMG v. Westchester

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 17, 2014

And that would be the source of IMG's liability, not some vicarious liability for K-Club's acts. … The last comment by IMG in their argument was that the contribution rights are preserved for a later day.

Oral argument — United States v. Steven Deuman

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2014

Well, there were some illusions there, Judge, that that particular individual had made some MySpace comments about. … Starr, who conceded in cross that a foreign body could have occluded the air passageways.

Oral argument — Strife v. AISD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2025

I've got to work in the heat and somebody else gets to work under air conditioning. We are literally talking environments. Go ahead. … I mean, the delay has to do with facts, and that's what was going on during that six-month period. Correct.

Oral argument — Vivint, Inc. v. Alarm.com Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2018

This particular air conditioning unit is not working. But that doesn't mean you're remotely configuring anything. … So if you have a comment on that, go ahead. If not, we'll close it up.

Oral argument — Daniel Forrand v. Federal Express Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2010

They involve aircraft mechanics and vehicle mechanics, administrative positions, operations positions, in divisions as different as ground operations, air operations, legal and finance, not all of whom … With respect to the comment that there are many different job categories and that they are set forth in the record and all that is true, again, with respect to the begin shift, end shift time, that is

Oral argument — In re: RS AIR, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2022

And so I guess to address your question, your comment first, we are not here arguing that this debtor does not qualify to file for bankruptcy. … Rather, it was periodically reimbursed for affiliate third party flights, either a break even or for a profit. And Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Dickens

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2020

the trial of other drugs being in in various possession of various of these Co-defendants and cooperative witnesses and that suggests that there were other drugs that the Suggests in the context of a clean … about impermissible Duplicitous this Why doesn't the argument founder on the Essential ground that a conspiracy as charged in count one is a separate and distinct offense From the various substantive acts

Oral argument — Whitaker v. Wedbush Securities, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2020

At least reading the language here, it seems that the comment is linking the definition of bank to acting on behalf of customers in funds transfers. … Henderson's argument correctly in the comments section where it says including acting on behalf of funds transfers, that's not exclusive also.

Oral argument — HRT Ent v. City of Detroit MI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2025

Well, it doesn't matter under Michigan law because remember it's Michigan law that controls under the Full Faith Inquiry Act. Then address Schaefer. … Delaware, that was a Clean Air Act or something along those lines.

Oral argument — United States v. Kyle Matthews

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2021

Detective Sergeant Becker in this case acted in good faith when he executed the search warrant at appellant's residence. … Judge, I appreciate that comment. In the affidavit that Detective Sergeant Becker prepared, there are two statements regarding the defendants residing at 21,000 North Emerald Road.

Oral argument — United States v. Shanin Moshiri

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2016

He had been, for five years, operating lawfully with a clean frame of mind, in good faith. And then Mr. … This is where the Taj Mahal comment comes in. Well, there's two conversations, one in February and one in March. Well, the Taj Mahal comment comes back when Mr. Poirot closes the trap.

Oral argument — Bona Fide Conglomerate, Inc. v. SourceAmerica

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2017

Everything from a Coast Guard facility to a courthouse, to an air, to an Air Force facility. We can look at each one. … Your Honor, under the, taking the allegations of the complaint is true, paragraph 76, at no time over the 10-year period where the wrongdoing is alleged, were there more than four board members from the