Documents

Oral argument — Fox Moraine, LLC v. United City of Yorkville

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2011

There was public comment to that effect. … If they don't act within that 180-day period, the application is deemed approved by operation of law, by the landfill siting statute.

Oral argument — State of Louisiana v. i3 Verticals

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2023

instance of failure to act that is specifically outlined in 48J. … That is a specific act that starts and stops. That's not a continuing tort.

Oral argument — United States v. Christopher Yates

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2024

The problem with the other co-conspirator statements are that a lot of times they aren't tethered to a time period. But this is a preponderance standard. … You have a brief comment to make. Go ahead. That certainly cannot be the law. That would limit a finding of ice or actual methamphetamine only to seize drugs and controlled purchases.

Oral argument — Finisar Corp v. DirecTV Group

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2008

That is programming that, like turnaround programming, is just beamed through the air. It's not downloaded under our construction of that term requiring retention. … Well because the overarching goal of JXE when it describes teletext is to accomplish the transmission of the most possible material within the shortest period of time.

Oral argument — Cramblett v. Midwest Sperm Bank, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2017

Count 2 was a claim for violation of Illinois' Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Count 4 was for violation of the Federal Magnuson Moss Act. … It dealt with an air show, I think, in the McLean County area. But the converse is also true, Your Honor. There is no case which prohibits it.

Oral argument — People v. Luna

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2012

Judge Gawne wanted to make sure that this trial was clean. And as you can tell from the size of the record and the issues that are raised, it was an extraordinarily clean trial. … And as we know from Massaro and from Bew and from Ligon, the cases that we cite in our brief, when we don't know the reason why an attorney didn't do something, an act of omission essentially, it's not

Oral argument — Leanna Coffman v. Nexstar Media Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2024

She used her family medical leave act. She used short term disability. … Atkinson, Appellant's appeal is based on contentions that the District Court aired by warning Nextar's summary judgment on all of Appellant's claims.

Oral argument — United States v. Robinson (USA)

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2026

There's not as clean of a fit between the border search exceptions purposes and digital contraband. … And so that is the guidance that was provided to agents, and the agents in this case were acting according to that guidance.

Oral argument — Purcell v. New York Institute

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2019

And then all the other comments come in either from either named harassers who don't comment onto the scene until later or from unnamed faculty members. Yes, although we did receive the texts. … Who was the fellow who commented about he wouldn't want to get in the car, but it was broken? Was that the same guy who also said something back in the earlier period? I believe so.

Oral argument — Stockbridge 600 West Jackson v. Industrious National Management Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2024

And that would be a really clean fraudulent transfer claim. But Stockbridge was still paying on the mortgage bill, right? That I don't know. … During this period of time where the tenant was already in breach. $20,000 was transferred long before that, and that was in your, I guess, contention that it was way overshadowed by the $917,000 you had

Oral argument — Clean Water Opportunities, Inc v. The Willamette V

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2018

Within a short period of time, EPS goes down to $12.95, which is substantially below what the defendants were charging. … You undertake acts to maintain your monopoly.

Oral argument — Atanda v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2011

But in this case, and as the court noted in Perez-Mejia in its new footnote, oftentimes there's not clean pleadings and evidentiary stage, but it's all mixed together. … Could you just comment on that, please? Yes, Your Honor. Whether he understood – it seems clear that he understood the question. This is an educated man. He was a comptroller for a hospital.

Oral argument — Neil Goldberg v. James Cameron

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2017

Then after my client inquired about it, they put it back in, and that was the last act in the conspiracy which re-triggered all the state statutes. … I can't comment on that. All I know is that for purposes of analyzing removal, we have to look at what was served on the parties. It is clear from the federal removal statutes itself.

Oral argument — The Estate of John R.H Thouron v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2014

And it could have been paid over a 10-year period. No doubt about that. So all of those were unanswered questions. … By analogy to this case, how to interpret 6166 in the final moments before November 6th was something that was up in the air. They weren't quite sure how to deal with it.

Oral argument — Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Angewand v. Sirius XM Radio Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 13, 2022

And we believe the arising under requires more of a direct length, not a one step or a two step remove from the underlying act. … There was an award of attorney's fees and also a conditional fee of, I think, $20,000 if the arbitration didn't occur within a specific time period.

Oral argument — United States v. Joshua Elkins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2012

here in support of his motion to dismiss reflect an exact, basically the same frequency of reporting, 90 days, lifetime duration, which again under SORNA could be knocked down to 25 years if he has a clean … Elkins was traveling, perhaps for an extended period of time, but traveling nonetheless, perhaps not moving.

Oral argument — Peterson Brothers v. Lexington Ins. Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2007

And the reason being is that that is not a protected act. The employee did not have, had not tested positive for drugs, was not in a rehab program. … Ciaz's use of drugs, illegal drugs, which is an intentional act.

Oral argument — Anthony v. Saul

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2025

The fact that there was the agency keeps referring to this three-month period between the time that she applied and the time that her date last insured expired and acts as if that doesn't mean we can't … look at any medical evidence after that time period.

Oral argument — United States v. Eligio Munoz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2022

That allowed a grace period, and that grace period expired on January 1, 2019. … The defendant's possession of the item in his car with two other firearms that he was in possession of, and the finding by the district court that that is ownership is not clear air.

Oral argument — United States v. Parrish Kappes

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2014

And that brings me back to the plein air on all of these issues. Why was there not an objection on any of these issues in the district court? They're in the PSR. … Hartslow, do you think that's an ageism comment? I do. I do. I do. You don't have to answer it. No. Thank you. Mr. Hillis. Thank you.