Documents

Oral argument — Menard v. Threlkeld

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2010

So when he has them, he has them personally, and at the point he's acting as his own attorney, he still does not have any duty to respond? … Just the fact that – Just the fact that – Cleaning? Mm-hmm. Filing? Yes. Nothing or an argument was made to the trial court? No.

Oral argument — People v. Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2025

And then the next act of aggression is Mr. … Now, Your Honors, I do want to briefly comment on a few other points in the case. One is, what happens after?

Oral argument — Optimum Services, Inc. v. Army

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2014

The government turned that back to them on September 18th, 2009 with their comments. And you can find those at J572 and 574. … In fact, the first sort of C recoding that they indicated was for wind loading, that the design was not adequate for wind loading, i.e., the piles 25 foot up in the air in a hurricane zone might be pushed

Oral argument — United States v. Parrish Kappes

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2014

And that brings me back to the plein air on all of these issues. Why was there not an objection on any of these issues in the district court? They're in the PSR. … Hartslow, do you think that's an ageism comment? I do. I do. I do. You don't have to answer it. No. Thank you. Mr. Hillis. Thank you.

Oral argument — United States v. Fox

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2022

Fox and escorts during the period, though, when the surveillance is in place. … In the government's theory, he should be patronizing escorts throughout this period.

Oral argument — Texas Medical Association v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2025

On the merits, to protect patients from ruinous surprise medical bills, Congress enacted the Surprise Act. … And for patients, the QPA can determine the cost-sharing responsibility, meaning a comment saying, oh, in terms of co-pay, or in terms of independent document.

Oral argument — Elouise Cobell v. Ryan Zinke

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2018

And he gave two reasons for excusing the violations, one of which is about the misquotation from the comment to the D.C. ethics rules, turning the meeting on its head. … It's all inextricably intertwined, and it was that – like for both practical purposes and under, I think, the clear reading or a clean reading of Rule 4 is what is now appealable.

Oral argument — Jeffboat, Incorporated v. Director, OWCP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2025

It doesn't matter for purposes of the Longshore Act. … Our lungs are comprised of tissue and then little pockets, little sacks of air that we all rely upon.

Oral argument — United States v. Repata-Garcia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2006

Repata-Garcia committed an intentional act, that is, he voluntarily entered the United States. The District Court discussed this specific instruction, asked for comment by government counsel. … This is under neither of the United States subject to harmless air review.

Oral argument — Sanchez v. Keisler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2008

But clearly – That's exactly what the BIA case says, is that the commission of this disqualifying act beyond the 10-year period, looking backward from the date of the final administrative decision – that … But the 10-year period that you would apply for whether or not they've maintained continuous residence is the exact 10-year period you should be applying in determining the period for good moral character

Oral argument — committievpricewaterhousecoopers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

It's really, in one sense, when you think about it, don't you really go back to Judge Posner's comments in Senko? … And you heard my comment that I don't want to screw up responding and superior laws.

Oral argument — United States v. Jose Chavez-Pacheco

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2014

And as the federal courts have analyzed that in both Leocal and Fernandez-Ruiz, it requires a purposeful act, some act that is intended to accomplish a particular outcome. … Then the person who committed the crime in the intervening period gets deported.

Oral argument — People v. Berg

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2019

There was a period of several hours that Mr. Berg was out of the house as well as Brittany and her friend were out of the house for another hour. And it was after Mr. … It could have been cleaning a gun. So neither of those things establishes any probable cause. And without probable cause, there is no exigent circumstances.

Oral argument — Windt v. Qwest Comm

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

The judge made a fundamental mistake both as to the existence of the proceedings that he commented on because he was dead wrong about that in terms of judging. … Well, actually, it's an important question because, of course, Judge Brown, Judge Brown was aired on the side of caution and assumed that the case would improve the RICO for precisely that reason.

Oral argument — Optimum Productions v. Home Box Office

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2020

You know, so the day, so, and so let's say there was a disparagement slash non-confidentiality claim within the period you're saying, et cetera. Do you think that would need to be arbitrated? … Anytime HBO airs anything that could be construed as disparaging. I can't see what the parties agree. Sure.

Oral argument — Fahie v. People of VI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2016

We want to put this person up and make them as clean as possible. So there'll be an accessory after the fact. … Caddy has said, you pursued a fact FOIA was, uh, acting, uh, uh, on his own at the time the crime was committed.

Oral argument — Patrick Caldwell v. Victoria Nelson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2017

Well, if he was acting as the managing member of the limited liability company and was acting in that capacity, then he could make that transfer. … In that case, the property was clearly owned outside of the 1,215 day period, and it was the mere act of recording the homestead declaration, which in Nevada is a way to perfect the entitlement to the

Oral argument — La Loma Grande, LLC v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 18, 2018

It was one of eight attorneys that made that comment, Your Honor. The others pursued it in full, robustly, much to the – It wasn't tried. Well, the DEC action was tried. … Now, the appellate looks now to the Equal Access to Justice Act to extend and get past the Federal Tort Claims Act limits.

Oral argument — Vivint, Inc. v. Alarm.com Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2018

This particular air conditioning unit is not working. But that doesn't mean you're remotely configuring anything. … So if you have a comment on that, go ahead. If not, we'll close it up.

Oral argument — April Hankins v. Philadelphia Contributionship Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2019

Her reasonable interpretation based on being there, being next to the comments as they were being made, is this is what needed to be done. … In that case, for example, the adjuster says, why don't you get a scraper and scrape all this mold off just to help clean it up to the homeowner.