Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.94s
Oral argument — Edward Rezek v. City of Tustin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2016
Under 148A, a police officer has to be acting within the legal scope of his or her duties in order for there to be a 148A resisting arrest cause of action. … Invalid because an officer can, because they would not have been acting within the lawful scope of their duties. You're just talking about the resisting arrest.
29 min of audioOral argument — Maricela Leyva Martinez v. Jefferson Sessions III
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2017
Well, if nobody's decided, then we are free to decide it on a clean slate. … And while it does define theft, which is an illegal act, it does not rise to the level of the reprehensible act that is required by this court and by the board to find a crime involving oral turpitude.
50 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Antwan Delaney
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2020
Oh, well, just the obvious that kissing is not a suspicious act. … We have to write on a clean slate or a partially filled slate. I think this Court would be breaking new ground that neither the Supreme Court nor other circuits have yet broken.
34 min of audioOral argument — Adoption of G.T.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 27, 2025
After the birth, the parties engaged in a relationship for a period of time. During that period of time, my client purported himself and carried on as the father of this child for a period of time. … Section 7 of the Adoption Act deals with process in adoption cases.
40 min of audioOral argument — Strife v. AISD
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2025
I've got to work in the heat and somebody else gets to work under air conditioning. We are literally talking environments. Go ahead. … I mean, the delay has to do with facts, and that's what was going on during that six-month period. Correct.
48 min of audioOral argument — WELLMAN INC v. EASTMAN CHEMICAL
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2010
Well, Your Honor, the point here is you've got two clean admissions from Nichols. You've got admissions from other of the inventors. … They never used spinel, period. So to say that we were going to have to come away from the HUR being carbon black, Your Honor.
35 min of audioOral argument — Frey v. Town of Jackson, WY
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2021
So these proceedings don't arrive with the kind of clean record that Iqbal and Twombly normally encompass, where the District Court is simply looking at the four corners of the complaint. … Just a few comments in response to Apolli's arguments. I first want to just express our stringent disagreement with the characterization of the record on the attorney's fees and sanctions.
33 min of audioOral argument — Judith Mottle Kerr Trust v. Holm
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2017
4 of the Fence Act. … I guess what I would like to do is initially begin on some of the comments that were presented here today and respond to Mr. Carroll's comments about the Fence Act and the like.
36 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2011
You go up to the Board and it's all very clean. You file an appeal. They file an answer. You don't bring anything up new in your answer, so there's no cert reply and you lose when you come here. … Some of the supporting comments are different. The rejection under 35 U.S.C. 12, second paragraph is verbatim the same as the rejection that was in the case before.
20 min of audioOral argument — Blaskovic v. Ashcroft
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2004
But according to his testimony, which wasn't said to be incredible, that the Air Force said he would be assassinated if war broke out, you know, because his father had been a — I guess because his father … Now, on exhaustion, the I.J. directed comments to the petitioners saying, if you had been present here for the required time, you might be eligible for the other relief, right? Yes, Your Honor.
28 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2020
He wants to keep both sides of the seesaw up in the air. The Court should overrule Cronholm's objections to the Lockport Fund's correction and affirm its decision for at least the following reasons. … He can't surmount the fact that the statute of limitations does not apply to governmental entities like the Lockport Fund acting in its public capacity.
35 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Brothers/Barker
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2007
And it covered a period of time from roughly December of 2002, January of 2003, up until the date of that indictment in May of 2003. … And the testimony was undisputed that Pitch received illegal drugs from Bryan over that entire period of time.
39 min of audioOral argument — People v. Borders
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2022
insofar as a judicial determination regarding the propriety of a seizure is concerned, there's no doctrine that simply allows an officer to act in good faith on the word of another officer. … And when we look at Watts's call log for the same period of time, it does not reflect an incoming call from Stokes at one forty two.
36 min of audioOral argument — Merritt Hawkins & Associates v. Larry Gresham, et
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2017
He pulled it totally out of the air, da-da-da-da, but jury does what they do. And so you get something that maybe is logical, but where is it inherently so defective? … Gresham over the 12-month period, and his non-compete runs for 12 months. That's the amount of profit the company lost.
47 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Kenneth Hart
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2023
That's still up in the air. And how do we get in this posture? So what I'll say, Your Honor, is I think the court specifically ruled on the pro se motion. … He had ruled on seven of the motions to continue over that two-and-a-half-year period.
43 min of audioOral argument — Speech First, Inc. v. Timothy Sands
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2022
That was a comment about standing in the context of Abbott, and the Court has said it in other cases as well. Now, they realize there are no rules that prohibit protected speech. … your room, or can you please clean your room.
44 min of audioOral argument — Joyce McKiver v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2020
In other words, they're just these open air lagoons that weren't covered. … That act clarified that under North Carolina law, the measure of damage is loss of property value, not discomfort. But the Right to Farm Act doesn't apply here. You would agree with that, would you?
56 min of audioOral argument — Barraza de Henriquez v. Garland
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2024
So there was really no detail about kind of the interim period there, and she was never asked. So there was really no inconsistency. … Does it mean that he saw any pretended or he acted as if nothing was happening because, well, he acted as if nothing was happening because he didn't realize anything was happening?
39 min of audioOral argument — People v. Schiller
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 29, 2012
And if the claim is a clean claim, it comes back here and there's nothing more. The case is over. But if he doesn't offer more, then obviously the familial should have accused himself at that point. … That's an appearance of impropriety that deserves some comment, some response from the judge. But nobody requested any comment?
43 min of audioOral argument — KELLOGG v. NIKE
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2011
It had to be acted on by the court. The court granted our motion without any conditions. … This was an effort to streamline the presentation of our case, period.
37 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.