Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.54s
Oral argument — In re Estate of Watson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2017
Fourth and fifth, fourth, the executor made his first distribution prior to the expiration of the six-month claim period in the Probate Act. … You breached the Probate Act because one of those distributions, the first one, was made six months prior to the end of the six-month claims period ending. Help me out. Sure.
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Ottaviano
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2013
186 and that's in a context suppression where there's an absolute waiver rule it's not just forfeiture it's waiver here we're saying it's forfeiture that should apply the standard here should be plain air … that what matters is that justice is done actually there's more than that the supreme court's made clear um that justice must act well must also satisfy the appearance of justice and appearances matter
36 min of audioOral argument — April Hankins v. Philadelphia Contributionship Insurance Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2019
Her reasonable interpretation based on being there, being next to the comments as they were being made, is this is what needed to be done. … In that case, for example, the adjuster says, why don't you get a scraper and scrape all this mold off just to help clean it up to the homeowner.
43 min of audioOral argument — United States v. John Toyofuku
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2018
What about the later period? What about the what? Later period. Okay. I think the single most important document in this case is Judah Pence report. … They have, it's out at Barbara's Point, the old Naval Air Station.
35 min of audioOral argument — Mark Bambach v. Gina Moegle
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2024
It seems to me they acted very expeditiously. But the expeditiously would be getting a court order if they're taking the kids. That's the expeditiously I'm talking about. … That period ends. A couple days goes by that he thought, within which he'd get the kids back.
30 min of audioOral argument — Vandesande v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2019
I know, but in the contract, it says once they get it, they have to pay it, and they have to pay it within a certain period of time. … That they still had an obligation to, which they did, they were acting consistently with my interpretation of the contract.
38 min of audioOral argument — BCR Safeguard Holding, L.L.C. v. Morgan Sta
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2015
But what that doesn't arrive at is then, yes, PPF had a right to invoke the buy-sell, to trigger the buy-sell period. … It is an absolute right, and to suggest that we acted under the circumstances in some way using our majority control is simply not correct.
42 min of audioOral argument — Adobe Systems v. Joshua Christenson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2015
And would all that get us to the point that it's just a toss-up in the air at this point and then there's a factual issue? … And if you read Foreman, what Foreman said – and of course, this is under the 1909 Act, which is a different standard anyway.
42 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Garcia
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2023
Could I just ask in that regard, we're talking about the conviction for the conspiracy and then there's the conviction for the Travel Act violation. … So he's going to inquire of counsel, who he's known, and obviously he's made some comments, respects her ability.
41 min of audioOral argument — Erica Tierney v. Advocate Health and Hospitals
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2015
And for them to make out a claim under the fair credit reporting act, they have to allege facts showing that the act applies here, which would require them to allege facts showing that the advocate is … Yeah, computer towers were taken, among some other items as well, including, I believe, a floor cleaning machine. And that was the circumstance.
34 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Demecia Washington
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 15, 2023
juror would not be aware of and so they have that testimony to consider for whatever it's worth to understand and i think that goes to my my second point that i wanted to make is whether it was plein air … innocent nicknames that's at page 10 of the reply brief that's not the case in sex that but for agent landau's explanation and to be very clear agent landau did not attempt to interpret any of these acts
34 min of audioOral argument — United States v. W.R. Grace
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2007
It was only when Judge Malloy entered a second series of orders that went to what some of the more substantive allegations would be and what the government would have to prove under the Clean Air Act that … The latency period for asbestos can be, for mesothelioma, can be anywhere from 25 to 40 years.
67 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Vera Kuzmenko
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2019
There is something disquieting about the notion that if you make a false statement to a person who is also acting fraudulently and they don't care about it because they have their own motives for fraud … As far as I was understanding the description, it was the amount of the loan minus what the House sold for, period. Did you figure that much out? We could figure that much out. All right.
42 min of audioOral argument — Sneed v. McDonald
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2016
Does the government still say that even if that's true, even if she didn't act diligently after August 2nd because she took 29 days and she should have acted more diligently under the circumstances? … Sneed still had responsibilities to be acting diligently herself, and that is what the Veterans Court found was lacking there.
32 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jose Chavez-Pacheco
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2014
And as the federal courts have analyzed that in both Leocal and Fernandez-Ruiz, it requires a purposeful act, some act that is intended to accomplish a particular outcome. … Then the person who committed the crime in the intervening period gets deported.
22 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Steven Deuman
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2014
Well, there were some illusions there, Judge, that that particular individual had made some MySpace comments about. … Starr, who conceded in cross that a foreign body could have occluded the air passageways.
26 min of audioOral argument — Mark Laster v. City of Kalamazoo MI
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2017
The retaliatory act that was to be litigated in connection with this protected activity was the selective enforcement of the firearm policy. … Laster was denied due process in terms of rulings made by the district judge and comments made by the district judge.
33 min of audioOral argument — RNC v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2024
race in its findings in the initial section of that act. … That is the provision that they are claiming they are refusing to act under because of this 90-day period and removing people, et cetera.
71 min of audioOral argument — Napcor Corporation v. JPMorgan Chase Kane Bank
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 17, 2010
Janke to act. The bank doesn't dispute any of those facts, and they're not an issue on their appeal here today. … Some of the first problems occur within a short period of time, over a 10-year span, a short period of time with that first, I think, blow-off, and then there were some other blow-offs.
34 min of audioOral argument — Sarah Thomas v. Neenah Joint School District
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 22, 2023
They're clean if it's not required to plead exact factual information that these other incidents specifics about the other incidents or other circumstances, but they need to present facts in their complaint … That's that's what it says for the vote for that period of time. Then we have the police officer the hobbling Etc.
26 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.