Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Jason Wheeler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2017

You go from someone who had a clean life to someone who is looking at images that involve sadomasochistic acts and bondage. … Is the transcript of the sentencing hearing that is in the record, is that a clean, final sentencing hearing transcript?

Oral argument — Arms of Hope v. City of Mansfield

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2024

It wouldn't just change in a couple of comments or something. So that there's a new ordinance, but there's no—but our appeal is an injunction of the original one. … Who's responsible for this bin at this location so we can tell them, hey, you need to clean it up.

Oral argument — Adom v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2025

Can I jump in, because this is going to help me in terms of thinking about the comments that you're going to make. I want to be very clear about the relief that you're seeking here. … Ladd tried to treat the condition as opposed to say, here's adult diapers, I don't know what's causing this incontinence, but this will help clean up the mess.

Oral argument — Glen-Davis v. City of Oakland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2005

By January 2001, the reorganization had to act in captain in January 2001 in area 2. Was anybody promoted during the so-called hiring freeze? … Was anybody promoted during that period? Either of those periods? Yes. Who was promoted? Well, during 2001, it's in my client's declaration, the sergeants and lieutenants were promoted.

Oral argument — United States v. Joshua Perez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2019

And with respect to your comment about his treatment in the ER, that's not hospitalization, surgery, or physical rehabilitation. … First, the standard review is plain-air. Jones v. United States makes that abundantly clear.

Oral argument — United States v. John Farrar

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2017

That case was decided on whether the statute at issue, the CPPA, the Child Pornography Prevention Act, was overbroad or not. … You instead talk about plain-air review. Well, I think plain-air review is kind of the best he can hope for.

Oral argument — Mark Bambach v. Gina Moegle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2024

It seems to me they acted very expeditiously. But the expeditiously would be getting a court order if they're taking the kids. That's the expeditiously I'm talking about. … That period ends. A couple days goes by that he thought, within which he'd get the kids back.

Oral argument — United States v. John Toyofuku

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2018

What about the later period? What about the what? Later period. Okay. I think the single most important document in this case is Judah Pence report. … They have, it's out at Barbara's Point, the old Naval Air Station.

Oral argument — Martin v. Goodrich Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2024

It wipes that slate clean and now makes those all civil claims. That is an absurd result and violates the balancing act that is the workers' compensation statutes. … So they responded to the Fulta decision and they addressed 1F or any repose period.

Oral argument — United States v. Gonzalez-Valdez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2008

This would be air under the, clearly air in the Sixth Circuit under Peters and Thomas, and I think this is consistent with this court's case law, particularly in Cardi. … In fact, it continued the sentencing hearing for a significant period of time in order to allow her to fully develop her sentencing memorandum.

Oral argument — Yem v. Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2023

Holder tells us that there's no magic period of time that would be... … And as a result, he has only been managed to work manual labor jobs, most recently in the dry cleaning business.

Oral argument — Mertes v. Village of Mount Prospect

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2024

Contrary to what the snarky comment made by the appellate court, that there's nowhere in the statute that TCEBA is a lifetime benefit. … Correct so, and that squares with the no act case. The no act case says the benefits attached on the date that eligibility is determined.

Oral argument — United States v. Taylor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2007

It's hard to act like they don't count for anything because it's the only reason your client was filing all these petitions, to get the benefit of the stays and to fend off creditors for periods of time … So how is it immaterial if it's the reason your client's acting the way he's acting? Well, the... And he's not fending off his creditors for sport.

Oral argument — The Coca-Cola Company and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 25, 2026

And for example, in the Ohio versus EPA case, the Supreme Court decided it invoked arbitrary capricious principles in construing the Clean Air Act. … in considering only tangible assets and excluding consideration of intangible assets is wrong as a matter of law and arbitrary and capricious for that reason alone, and if I could just make one more comment

Oral argument — RNC v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2024

race in its findings in the initial section of that act. … That is the provision that they are claiming they are refusing to act under because of this 90-day period and removing people, et cetera.

Oral argument — Juan Machado Amadis v. DOS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2020

There's no supervising attorney comments or discussion. And, in fact, the recommendation that is redacted, it looks to be a one- or two-word recommendation. … Because it becomes a final agency decision if they act on it.

Oral argument — Phil Thalheimer v. City of San Diego

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2010

That is, we are seeking to retain the status quo that existed previous to the acts complained of, and the acts complained of is the adoption of these laws that restrict the First Amendment activity of … You see, that's my trouble with Randall because it's a typical, careful, balancing, multi-factor, nuanced opinion, which doesn't give us a clean rule for now.

Oral argument — United States v. Stonehill, etc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2011

Hagestad found some fortunate person in the FOIA release thing who said, oh, I can get you a clean copy, and she did, and it revealed what I just told you. … And one of the reasons they never got it is because the government acted like, well, we don't have any control over the NBI.

Oral argument — Etheridge v. Jamison

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2025

And what the committee comments show us is this is really meant for the parties' convenience. But the issue, you're saying, prevails over the Illinois Constitution. … When we go back to the purpose of 205, it's a uniform interstate family support act. That's the whole purpose of this sort of statute.

Oral argument — United States v. Alfred Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2025

And the third issue is whether the court erred in allowing evidence of a prior 404B act, which is the similar act that happened five years prior to the charged conduct. … It's you have the right to use the property for some determined period, a year or two years as you had in this case.