Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.71s

  • Oral argument — Abigail Wilson v. Gaston County, NC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2017

    And then, so litigants try to clean up with subsequent testimony or deposition testimony, problematic elements in their case. … Within 180 days of the bad act happening.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Brian Bishop

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2013

    But the State Department's information was, we won't ship ammunition, period. … They're both five people, and they've both cleaned my clocks on several occasions.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — 04-17558 Maria Pintos v. Pacific Creditors

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2007

    I think that is the case under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. And if you look at the Fair Credit Reporting Act in total, Mr. … I have a few comments to clean up. Mr. McClune challenged this on the record as the reasons for pulling the credit report of Ms. Pintos at the excerpts of records submitted by Pacific Creditors.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Nautilus Insurance Co. v. 200Christian Stret Partners LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2020

    When you talk about the air conditioner, you're talking about a problem with the air conditioner, but they're not alleging any property damage resulting from that. … And I don't think there is an allegation of a plaintiff that has standing to for bodily injury that actually occurred during the policy period, even if there was. Got it.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Ba

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 25, 2019

    Congress is trying to clean up the Internet. That's very clear. … And if he had gone to probation during this period when Mr.

    100 min of audio
  • Oral argument — State of California v. The Little Sisters of the Poor

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2018

    If you compare RFRA with the Administrative Procedures Act, only one of them has a good cause exemption. … What comment could California add that the agency has simply not thought of because it didn't have the benefit of California's comments?

    66 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Travion Blount v. Harold Clarke

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2018

    To leave it alone, Judge Monk, but the district court's original decision in this case was, is premised on the idea that no act of executive clemency can cure the initial gram violation such that the taint … I mean, it seems to me important to use this case to clean up as much as we can. If there's maybe there's some confusion about this.

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Mocktar Tairou v. Jefferson Sessions III

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2018

    In fact, country conditions and the immigration judge acknowledge that homosexuals may be arrested in Benin on pretext of homosexual acts as punishable directly. … If the brandishing of the knife can be construed as a threat of death, and it sounds like I don't want clean words in your mouth.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Litzsinger v. Adams County Coroner's Office

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2021

    She admits that she had been abusing it before, but then she cleaned up her act and she was doing very well after she was put on probation. I mean, helping her son out. … Lissinger argues now that the coroner, because she put her on a six month probation period instead, that that created pretext.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Chamber of Commerce of the USA v. U.S. Depa

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 31, 2017

    And in this sense and in others, this case resembles the Supreme Court's UARG or utility air case, where in there as well, the agency first overdefined air pollutant and then adopted what it called a tailoring … And just to comment on that briefly, again, this is not the Federal Retirement Insurance Agency.

    67 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Robert Sherman v. Carolyn W. Colvin

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2014

    But if you go into either McFarland or into Mosher, they both find, at 386, McFarland says he's moderately limited in his ability to maintain attention, concentration for extended periods. … Moser questioned his overall motivation to work, and I would say the credibility of his disability claim, and made the comments about his lifestyle choice and the use of marijuana.

    20 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Matthews v. City of Peoria

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2023

    I want to go back to your comment on the side letter agreement. You indicated that Mr. Matthews signed that. Yes. … In other words, they had an easement to construct, and during that period there could be no suit because it was not wrongful.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Speech First, Inc. v. Timothy Sands

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2022

    That was a comment about standing in the context of Abbott, and the Court has said it in other cases as well. Now, they realize there are no rules that prohibit protected speech. … your room, or can you please clean your room.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Jason Wheeler

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2017

    You go from someone who had a clean life to someone who is looking at images that involve sadomasochistic acts and bondage. … Is the transcript of the sentencing hearing that is in the record, is that a clean, final sentencing hearing transcript?

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — DLS Precision Fab LLC v. ICE

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2017

    We can't just go through the air. Your honor, if I write something, it's going to have to do with the CTE something or some of these things of why the ALJ was wrong. … But it's really not, the government really is the leading or, if it wants to act, it can act, the Congress has made a determination that is going to hold at a certain point the government's interpretation

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Arms of Hope v. City of Mansfield

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2024

    It wouldn't just change in a couple of comments or something. So that there's a new ordinance, but there's no—but our appeal is an injunction of the original one. … Who's responsible for this bin at this location so we can tell them, hey, you need to clean it up.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Adom v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2025

    Can I jump in, because this is going to help me in terms of thinking about the comments that you're going to make. I want to be very clear about the relief that you're seeking here. … Ladd tried to treat the condition as opposed to say, here's adult diapers, I don't know what's causing this incontinence, but this will help clean up the mess.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Glen-Davis v. City of Oakland

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2005

    By January 2001, the reorganization had to act in captain in January 2001 in area 2. Was anybody promoted during the so-called hiring freeze? … Was anybody promoted during that period? Either of those periods? Yes. Who was promoted? Well, during 2001, it's in my client's declaration, the sergeants and lieutenants were promoted.

    26 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Joshua Perez

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2019

    And with respect to your comment about his treatment in the ER, that's not hospitalization, surgery, or physical rehabilitation. … First, the standard review is plain-air. Jones v. United States makes that abundantly clear.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Elouise Cobell v. Ryan Zinke

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2018

    And he gave two reasons for excusing the violations, one of which is about the misquotation from the comment to the D.C. ethics rules, turning the meeting on its head. … It's all inextricably intertwined, and it was that – like for both practical purposes and under, I think, the clear reading or a clean reading of Rule 4 is what is now appealable.

    49 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.