Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.52s
Oral argument — Clarence Davis v. Capital One N.A.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2025
Davis received illegal calls from Capital One which violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and he has a judgment against Capital One for those violations. Mr. … So a subpoena to the carrier for records before that period of time would indicate the dates of disconnect. It's not as clean because the R&D is simple.
41 min of audioOral argument — Singh v. Cigna Corp
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2018
caused by Cigna's acquisition of the HealthSpring corporation which closed in January of 2012 HealthSpring was a had never been sanctioned by CMS even once so unlike Cigna HealthSpring had an absolutely clean … perhaps you could just address a question about maybe I'm confused about discovery in this case when this motion was pending can you just describe the procedural setting in which this in which the court acted
39 min of audioOral argument — Charles Holloway v. State of Maryland
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2021
However, in amending the complaint, I think it could be cleaned up to sort of differentiate the things at issue. … Because it's not, I mean, the meeting itself isn't something that would be characterized as an act of retaliation.
43 min of audioOral argument — Deverturda v. Globe Aviation Security Services
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2006
Here, there was no clean break, as we alleged in the complaint, between the Federal Government coming in and taking over the location at San Jose Airport. There were layoffs and phases. … Some Globe employees continued to work at the airport for a substantial period of time. All that goes to the issue of control.
32 min of audioOral argument — Y.Y.G.M. SA v. Redbubble, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2023
First, the Supreme Court said it is the standard for willful blindness, period, and it's been applied in criminal cases, let alone other intellectual property cases. … make air conditioners.
35 min of audioOral argument — Texas Medical Association v. HHS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2025
On the merits, to protect patients from ruinous surprise medical bills, Congress enacted the Surprise Act. … And for patients, the QPA can determine the cost-sharing responsibility, meaning a comment saying, oh, in terms of co-pay, or in terms of independent document.
66 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Lawrence Halamek
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2021
And so really similar to Harris, there was a short period of time. And also, the victim in Harris lived with the defendant and called him Dad. … So the court did not air much less plainly. So in finding that that care custody enhancement applied.
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Gradinariu
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2008
But, again, you don't just pick a number out of thin air. Another time he says 18 years is fine with me because I know I screwed up. Again, this 18 years is weighing on him. … I'd like to comment that I think you both argued this case very well, and it's a pleasure to have good lawyers like you before the court. So thank you both for your argument. I agree. I second that.
25 min of audioOral argument — United States v. William Murphy
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2011
So we would be for plain air, correct? You do. You do. … One is the authoritative tone or manner in which the officers approach and act. Second, the number of officers. Third, whether weapons are displayed.
28 min of audioOral argument — Snyder & Associates Aquisition v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2017
But the—but the—but the comments made by the IRS that revealed some confidential information took place after that investigation. The tax investigation was over. Right. … You're taking the position here that you're just immune, period. So we haven't gotten to any of that yet.
33 min of audioOral argument — MI Dept of Env Great Lakes v. Gerald R Ford Intl Airport
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2024
You're simply complying with air safety regulations, which is the same thing that the airport authority is doing here. … That's not an acting under relationship.
29 min of audioOral argument — Joyce Higgs v. Costa Crociere S.P.A.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2017
And then these other allegedly egregious comments are made and not so much of a sound comes from Counsel Table for Costa in response. … Period. Yes, sir. Yes, sir. If we look at the motion in limine, it says that. The judge says I'm going to grant the motion.
36 min of audioOral argument — Glen-Davis v. City of Oakland
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2005
By January 2001, the reorganization had to act in captain in January 2001 in area 2. Was anybody promoted during the so-called hiring freeze? … Was anybody promoted during that period? Either of those periods? Yes. Who was promoted? Well, during 2001, it's in my client's declaration, the sergeants and lieutenants were promoted.
26 min of audioOral argument — Bell v. Don Prudhome Racing
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 17, 2010
It was a down period. There was no drag racing taking place around the country at the time. So he's at home. His residence was in Illinois? Yes, it was. Okay. He was at home during this time period. … What if he or she is driving from one state to another or in the air flying over states? Why would – because they have their cell phone and are in Indiana versus Illinois versus Florida.
41 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2019
The appellant asks this Court to consider the Child Advocacy Act, 55 ILCS 80-1. … Both involved acts of penetration, penis to vagina.
39 min of audioOral argument — Estes v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2013
what was, was there an air conditioned room, and there's no way this stroke could have occurred. … So every time an employer chews out an employee, we've got potential case under the act. No, it has to be greater stress than the general public.
23 min of audioOral argument — EARP v. STOKES
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2005
The critical distinction here is between talking about that period and talking about the period after he received his Miranda warnings. … Earp acted the way he did if he was innocent, why he said what he did, didn't say what he did, acted the way he did after the injury. And that could be accounted for by this evidence.
65 min of audioOral argument — People v. Williams
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2025
And then the next act of aggression is Mr. … Now, Your Honors, I do want to briefly comment on a few other points in the case. One is, what happens after?
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Shane Maggi
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 1, 2009
First-degree murder would extend under 1153 under the Major Crimes Act. How about felon in possession of a firearm? … Your Honor, very briefly, with respect to the last comment made by counsel regarding the Blackfeet Tribal Code, the code is the code. It's the tribal law. It's not evidence.
51 min of audioOral argument — JOSEPH T. GARGIULO v. DHS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2013
And so the remedy would be back pay for the three months between the two periods? Yeah, the remedy here would be back pay. … But a meaningful reply surely means something other than a reply to the janitor who cleans the building, right?
34 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.