Documents

Oral argument — Felise Mamea v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2012

period or a shorter period. … And we have made the decision that there is one and only one limitations period for Federal Tort Claims Act cases, and that is the 2-year period which we have adopted.

Oral argument — Williams v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2026

But let's assume that it's clean, pure as the driven snow. Does the fact that he has a 20-year-old DUI make him dangerous? I think it very well might. … And we know there's going to be 90 days for comment. What the final rule will look like after those comments, anyone's guess. I mean, but from your argument, it sounds like no one can use 925C.

Oral argument — United States v. Miguel Valle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2019

Right, that the government – where an issue has been fully aired below, the government doesn't get a second bite at the apple. The apple. Sorry, and that's Espinosa-Morales. … There, although admittedly, that was a much shorter period. There's no question that was a much shorter period.

Oral argument — G.E Capital Mortgage v. Maldonado

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2005

They did not act consistent with that position that they've taken during the course of litigation. Well, can I ask you just sort of a sequencing problem with the statute? … Just negligence in the air, negligence around harm is nothing. It's only when the IRS takes the money that you may be harmed. Right? I would respectfully disagree.

Oral argument — Kurtz v. 630 N. State Parkway Condominium

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 26, 2012

So they didn't pay that for a long period of time? That's correct. There was some peripheral disputes and it didn't work out. … So in terms of periods of time that we're dealing with, there was a period of time of approximately two months or something like that when a sum of $10,000 or so was due in owing.

Oral argument — Martin Operating Partnership v. USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2015

The Coast Guard can't just simply raise its finger in the air and say, smells dangerous, feels dangerous, and seek to regulate that activity. … It's that period of five months that was, period that we're complaining of, in part in our briefing and in the district court, that that five-month period required the Coast Guard to do its safety risk

Oral argument — United States v. Adelio Batres

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2018

So even if this was a comment on his not getting acceptance of responsibility, the government's duty was never triggered to not oppose acceptance. … So the conviction itself should be sustained, period. End of story.

Oral argument — Berry Plastics Corporation v. Illinois National Insurance Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2018

So you have a period of time for fresh air to sit back and review the pleadings and reacquaint yourself with issues that you know well and to look at them sometimes in different ways. … I don't have much time left, and I do want to hit a couple of comments. One is counsel mentioned that California law has evolved from ReadyPAC. With all respect, that's incorrect.

Oral argument — Golden v. CH2M Hill Hanford Group

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2007

In other words, deposition was a time period when – I can't give you the exact time, but it was several months before the declaration. Just because Mr. … It just had to be, as Judge Kaczynski well put it, because you ran out of air. I think the answer to the second question is that that would not be covered by the Price-Anderson Act.

Oral argument — Michael Germain v. US Bank National Association, e

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2019

Because there is a 30-day time period being provided in the language itself. … to foreclosure under the Texas Debt Collection Act.

Oral argument — Tiene v. Law Office of J Scott Watson P C

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2018

And they did halt collections for that period of time, that there was supposed to be a meeting. … It's just wipe the slate clean and start all over to say that you get issue preclusion effect based on that. Especially when the court said that I don't see any intentional misconduct.

Oral argument — Dodson International Parts v. Williams International Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2021

encompasses any claim that arises out of the maintenance performed now maintenance is the issue and what's maintenance performed in this instance all it is inspection that was performed during the time period … which is an engine control system that turned the service of the engine the gas producer units were also signed off on as being airworthy and returned to service in the return to the service of that air

Oral argument — United States v. GOSSMAN

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2005

And in each one of these, the very first sentence says, You have accepted responsibility to act on behalf of Rose Dreischfeld. … This comment was made in the context of a direct response to that.

Oral argument — Michael Hoover v. Justin Due

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2025

So the officer just can't act in self-defense? I think, I think it depends. … Whereas here, in this particular case, it's almost one continuous act.

Oral argument — Midland Funding LLC v. Hilliker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2016

So to go to the comments of other sources, the comment says, what are our sources? It lists various types of collateral benefits that are covered by the rule. Number one is insurance policies. … First, that was a Dram Shop Act case. I think then it was called the Liquor Control Act, but I believe now it's referred to as the Dram Shop Act.

Oral argument — DLS Precision Fab LLC v. ICE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2017

We can't just go through the air. Your honor, if I write something, it's going to have to do with the CTE something or some of these things of why the ALJ was wrong. … But it's really not, the government really is the leading or, if it wants to act, it can act, the Congress has made a determination that is going to hold at a certain point the government's interpretation

Oral argument — Oglala Sioux Tribe and Alignin v. NRC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2021

All of those issues were aired and so why would we remand? Why wouldn't it be futile under these services? Thank you your honor. … Yes by adding those conditions without any public review without allowing any other agencies or the tribe to comment or or give input it violates both the National Historic Preservation Act with respect

Oral argument — United States v. Tracy Baskerville

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2020

but even with that it is still 90 months higher than what the maximum would have been under the original plea agreement The designation completely changed the nature of the case and if you look at the comments … Yeager, I'm sorry we would like to thank you for taking this case under the Criminal Justice Act that is a service to your client Mr.

Oral argument — Assoc. Flight Attn. v. Mesa Air Group, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2009

Your Honor, my name is Joseph Manson, and I'm counsel for Mesa Air Group, the appellant, and I'd like to reserve two minutes for rebuttal, if I may. Okay. … , which are the central provisions of the act in that it requires both parties.

Oral argument — United States v. Da

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2017

Was he acting for the government when he did this? It seems to me he was acting against the government's interest and against the law. He was acting against the law. … It only looked at this three month period even though it's clear that these leaks continued for a storm and investigation and that the gambit worked.