Documents

Oral argument — Rhode v. Bonta

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 25, 2026

And we think that it's a very clean analysis here. And that, of course, a law that says you have to pass through a gate that the government controls in order to acquire ammunition. … Thank you for your additional comments. And you have some time left for rebuttal. So I wanted to just start with the Dormant Commerce Clause claim.

Oral argument — Dodson International Parts v. Williams International Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2021

encompasses any claim that arises out of the maintenance performed now maintenance is the issue and what's maintenance performed in this instance all it is inspection that was performed during the time period … which is an engine control system that turned the service of the engine the gas producer units were also signed off on as being airworthy and returned to service in the return to the service of that air

Oral argument — Nelson Pleitez-Bermudez v. Merrick Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2022

Because the threats were directed to him, his wife, and his two minor children, they all fled together, a short period of time after the threats were made. … But I don't think we got a clean holding out of the BIA that that was a cognizable group, did we? Or out of our court? I think we only said that, well, even the problem is she can't get out of it.

Oral argument — Sonya Williams v. Shelby Co TN Bd of Ed

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2024

So theoretically, she's entitled to damages for that period, right? … Williams argues that they were just simply trying to clean it up, but there's absolutely no evidence of that, and they took out substantial, important language related to the requirements of the list and

Oral argument — W.S. v. Cassandra Daniels

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2024

Because otherwise, how can you say that DSS was grossly negligent if they had no notice that this particular child would act out? Well, because they put five others in that were acting out, right? … And that's what said the jury was limited in what they considered those other acts for.

Oral argument — Quinteros Ramos v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2010

They can't store all of this stuff forever, so they clean it out every so often. … Did the judge act arbitrarily, irrationally, and contrary to law? And under the circumstances here, the immigration judge did not.

Oral argument — Oncor Electric Delivery Compan v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2017

But in determining whether it has lost the protection of the act, which is the employer's burden in that case, yet that the disparaging comment is considered, it's a balancing test under Direct TV. … We're going to take what he says with a grain of salt, given this battle against smart meters, period.

Oral argument — In Re: Seven Oaks Partners, LP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2019

The finances of the Licatas were somewhat strained throughout that entire period. So, would it be unusual for you or I to move six times in that period? Probably. Well, me anyway. … The case was held up for some period of time, but not by the fact that Mrs. Licata's claim was still up in the air.

Oral argument — Feds for Medical Freedom v. Biden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2022

Um, some of the other cases, AFGE versus Trump and AFGE versus Air Force, um, are, um, especially helpful. … It's definitely moved away from them in the AFTE versus Trump case and the AFTE versus Air Force case.

Oral argument — Peterson v. Board of Trustees of the Bolingbrook Police Pension Fund

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2022

Does that mean that they're seeing you as a judge and you're acting as a judge? Mr. … They took every single event that occurred over that time period and said, copper, motivated by being a cop, killed her. That was because he was a cop.

Oral argument — People v. Golden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2008

clean hands either. … If you are going to allow late notices of appeal, as the Supreme Court rule stands now, they can only be allowed within a six-month period of time.

Oral argument — United States v. Jason Fowler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2016

Specifically, you would look at Comment 2 and Comment 3 of Section 3D1.2 of the guidelines that discusses how they're grouped. … So we go through the process of calculating the guidelines with a clean slate. Start at 2E1.1 and then go, what is the highest of the predicate acts?

Oral argument — Fraley v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2025

Zucke asking the question, if you compare how you were at those two different periods, you certainly were any worse. True. … Petitioner testified he's currently working at Amazon Air. He's stacking boxes, airport containers onto rollers so he can stack them.

Oral argument — Kamel ChaneySnell v. Andrew Young

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2023

his hands in the air, his hands are in the air, they hit him once. … Yeah, so a very short period. They can't just drag anyone. So then there is no de minimis exception.

Oral argument — Lei v. Mukasey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2007

Do you have a comment on that? Yes, I do, Your Honor. … Just this comment. Finish your sentence.

Oral argument — United States v. Pattison

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2026

My friend at Custodial disagrees that the comments by my client indicates that. Our expert says that it does, that those comments putting in work. So we could debate that. That's fine. … At one point, threatening to kill black children to clean the bloodlines.

Oral argument — Capital Finance, LLC v. Oscar Rosenberg

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2020

There wasn't much talk of the evidence of intent here, but the suggestion that the court aired by concluding that Mr. … And then regarding, you know, counsel commented about how to infer intent based upon, again, Mr. Newman's sophistication.

Oral argument — Killion v. City of Centralia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2010

I characterize the fine as a $750 fine for a 75-day period. And I looked at the fact that there are five defendants. … Two doors, an air compressor, a workbench, and a torch, and a backhoe.

Oral argument — Beckwith v. Frey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 28, 2025

That waiting periods are designed to, in fact, prevent impulsive acts of violence means that Maine's waiting period fits comfortably within the category of laws that the Supreme Court approved of in Bruin … They're going to act rashly by going to someone who they know sells guns. And that's the kind of sale that gets delayed by the waiting period.

Oral argument — People v. Jones

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2014

So the court comments that the plea that was presented was an open plea. They're not disingenuous. … Because even an erroneous ruling or an erroneous act by a judge does not by itself demonstrate prejudice or bias.