Documents

Oral argument — Stephen Grant v. Steven Zorn

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2023

That's this court in Hayes versus Hoffman Perfect distillation of the public disclosure bar section of the False Claims Act Now the False Claims Act incentivizes citizen participation and blowing the whistle … Grant first in Andrzejczyk Well Andrzejczyk involved a cult leader who for a period of years systematically physically and emotionally abused minors Which this court appropriately considered to be extremely

Oral argument — Tiene v. Law Office of J Scott Watson P C

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2018

And they did halt collections for that period of time, that there was supposed to be a meeting. … It's just wipe the slate clean and start all over to say that you get issue preclusion effect based on that. Especially when the court said that I don't see any intentional misconduct.

Oral argument — Anthony Mathis v. Terra Renewal Services, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2023

The hissing noise was it escaping, and the air escaping, and it would go away by itself. … I think you could put a period at the end of this case at that point because that's contributory negligence right there coming from the plaintiff's mouth.

Oral argument — United States v. Donald Allen Jr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2017

I think it was even a shorter period of time than that. I thought it was just maybe two days. Maybe two days, okay. But whatever was subsequent to that. … But still we would, again, obviously I'm out of time, but I think as far as the search is concerned that I would agree with your comments or what I understood your comments to be, Judge Stranch, that a

Oral argument — Michael Germain v. US Bank National Association, e

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2019

Because there is a 30-day time period being provided in the language itself. … to foreclosure under the Texas Debt Collection Act.

Oral argument — Katherine Castor v. ATT Umbrella Benefit Plan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2018

And I'd like to pick up with some of the comments and questions that were raised during Mr. McDonald's state opening. … Goyal that she, at the relevant time period in December of 2014, could no longer perform her job. Thank you, Your Honors. Thank you. May it please the Court. I feel lucky to have Eric as a colleague.

Oral argument — People v. Ealy

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2019

And it was a shot in the air. Multiple shots. Okay. … You have an intent, a shared intent, to commit some criminal act in retaliation.

Oral argument — James Richardson v. Joyce Kornegay

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2021

Richardson's trial counsel was objectively unreasonable in failing to appreciate and act on that admissibility requirement to ensure that the expert observed both parties' witnesses. … Obviously, here it wasn't an offhanded comment.

Oral argument — Eckhart v. FOX News Network, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2026

Specifically, she alleged, and the discovery showed sufficient to survive a motion for summary judgment, that she was raped, sexually assaulted, and sexually harassed by one of FOX News' prominent on-air … Henry here would have the ability and responsibility to engage in some degree of managerial or supervisory acts. And having had the opportunity to work with him specifically and see that.

Oral argument — United Gilsonite Laboratories v. Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2011

Which are both bringing this under the purview of the act. Yes. Okay. … Bergman did not have sarcoidosis before December the 19th or around that time period of 1996.

Oral argument — Fraley v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2025

Zucke asking the question, if you compare how you were at those two different periods, you certainly were any worse. True. … Petitioner testified he's currently working at Amazon Air. He's stacking boxes, airport containers onto rollers so he can stack them.

Oral argument — Rhode v. Bonta

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 25, 2026

And we think that it's a very clean analysis here. And that, of course, a law that says you have to pass through a gate that the government controls in order to acquire ammunition. … Thank you for your additional comments. And you have some time left for rebuttal. So I wanted to just start with the Dormant Commerce Clause claim.

Oral argument — NLPC v. East Coast Lightning Equipment

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2020

I'll begin my presentation by addressing the Court's request for discussion about jurisdiction, and then I'll move on to the Lanham Act issues. … But all they have said is that these people bought our product, period. No additional commentary, no additional claims, no nothing.

Oral argument — Parejav.Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 24, 2010

They cited one Seventh Circuit case, Cortez-Castillo, which also didn't itself cite any BIA precedents from that criminal period. … It's very hard, because the common law always said when you act illegally, you can't get anything out of it, but they come to the United States, act illegally, have the child, and now say, well, we ought

Oral argument — People v. Elliott

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2013

You don't need further act by the Secretary of State to do anything. And the Idle case was, at trial level, successfully tried by my co-counsel, Mr. Ramsell. … One, they don't have the problem with a future second suspension that would second driving while suspended, or the cleaning up the abstract.

Oral argument — People v. King

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 27, 2019

The second basis is that he acted as his own counsel. … So this did give counsel some, perhaps, leverage if there was a clean negotiation to go on. But the overriding concern here is that he represented himself.

Oral argument — Watkins v. Ingalls Memorial Hospital

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2018

And whether it's filing a lawsuit or feeding themselves and cleaning themselves. … Also in federal court, the question of tolling is an open question as to whether a mental incapacity may toll the limitations period in the Federal Courts Claims Act.

Oral argument — Oncor Electric Delivery Compan v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2017

But in determining whether it has lost the protection of the act, which is the employer's burden in that case, yet that the disparaging comment is considered, it's a balancing test under Direct TV. … We're going to take what he says with a grain of salt, given this battle against smart meters, period.

Oral argument — Family Pac v. Rob McKenna

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2010

in favor of having it stay while the significant issues presented by the district court decision are fully aired by this court. … It was not feasible to file an appeal within that window and ask the Ninth Circuit to act that quickly. You heard Ms.

Oral argument — Speech First, Inc. v. Timothy L. Killeen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 27, 2020

The court made factual findings that we review for clear air. Did you put in any evidence to support your allegation that the BART reports are referred to the university police? … Absolutely no suggestion, and again, a statement from a state employee, the acting dean of students of the university, no intention to reinstate this.