Documents

Oral argument — Lux v. Benavides

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2026

It was just referred to as the Motor Carrier Act. And the proper name of the act is the Federal Motor Carrier Act. There was one glib question. … But it's not the plaintiff's duty to breathe air into their affirmative defenses. There were no... It is your duty to show prejudice.

Oral argument — Chemours Co FCLL C v. US Prot Agency

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2024

Seemingly, they may be referring to the Clean Water Act permit that North Carolina issued. But in their briefs, and I think here, too, they've disclaimed reliance on that for purposes of standing. … And if this is final agency action, then it's a substantive final agency action that has to go through notice and comment.

Oral argument — 1-17-3104

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2020

And Heron is the canonical plain air closely balanced evidence case in the court fund. It was balanced based on the flaws. … Why don't you play this all out using the plain air analysis? Why don't you go ahead and carry it out for us? Sure.

Oral argument — Globe Savings Bank v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2006

Otherwise, you'd been stuck with $7 million, period. … It exceeded plan for every period, every reporting period, after the contract was executed. Okay.

Oral argument — Levine v. City of Alameda

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2008

That was the allegedly offending act. Is that correct? I believe that was the allegedly offending act in Little. … That is a question that the district court left up in the air.

Oral argument — State of Washington v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2021

So in that period, anybody who is told to by a police officer to get out of the car is acting under a federal agent? … That is not Greyhound's intention, and I'm trying to clean it up for you, so to speak. All right. So explain to me how it can be, how both things can be.

Oral argument — Bretta Pollara v. Radiant Logistics, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2016

We had agreed with my counsel for Ocean Air beforehand that I would take about five minutes and defer to Ocean Air because they have many more issues that they have to address to the Court, so I'll try … And at some point the Court made that distinction or comment or clarification.

Oral argument — United States v. Rutkowski

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2003

And if you go through the facts of the case, there was only a short time period where Mr. Murkowski was not with his family. … And he had been clean since then because he was on probation and checked.

Oral argument — People v. Hunter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2013

And you want a remand for this to be tidied up, cleaned up, and taken care of? Yes. All right. Yes, and I understand what you want to do. … This court has determined on two occasions since it offhandedly commented in the 06 appeal that the record didn't reveal what happened to this petition.

Oral argument — 04-35407 ISSC, Inc v. Baugh-Skanska Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2005

Judge Lasnik understood the full effect of the unconditional release, and the effect was it released Miller Act claims through November 30, 2002. No Miller Act claim is made for that period. … If you want your job clean, then someone's going to have to redesign these things if someone's going to allow suppliers to spread money over six jobs. But if you, well...

Oral argument — Unite Here! Local 5 v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 15, 2019

I don't know local law whether that would be considered a potentially criminal act, but there's that instance. … And a strike fundamentally changes the calculus with respect to Section 7 of the Act and, therefore, with respect to Section 8B1A.

Oral argument — Anthony Mangum v. S. Hallembaek

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2016

The feds then processed their charges, sentenced them to a period of time. … Good lawyers clean up all that mess because otherwise this is what happens.

Oral argument — People v. Sanchez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2019

So he is performing these tasks during that interim period. … If you've got that, you don't need a free air sniff. A free air sniff is lawful because it doesn't reveal the presence of anything anyone has a right to possess.

Oral argument — United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Findley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2025

Toll case, which talks about, I think, the Clean Water Act and some of the intricacies of assessing penalties, doesn't give liberty to the judge to then find and use new facts without cross-examination … There was only one quarterly statement that was filed during this period.

Oral argument — Kirtz v. Trans Union LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2022

They're all part of the same Consumer Credit Protection Act. So Congress, when it wanted to create exceptions, knew how to do that during that time period. … Did it expose the United States states or government agencies to those criminal or that whole series of provisions, including period?

Oral argument — Simmons v. The United States o

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2019

It was meant to allow the government to be liable for acts of negligence when it is acting in its capacity similar to an individual or commercial actor. … But at this moment, on this record, you know, I think the key policy decision that comes up in the Nairobi case and in the — there's an Air Force-based case from other circuits.

Oral argument — Dennis Turney v. Hyundai Construction Equipment

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2012

Specifically, there was in the record a series of three comments by Mr. Lim, who was the president of HCE, and the comments bracketed the adverse personnel action. So when he met Mr. Turney, Mr. … No, period. I mean, I could spend ten minutes and six seconds standing here and saying, well, how old are you, and you don't look that old, what does that import?

Oral argument — Goldstein v. Harris

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2003

The bottom line is that we're asked to believe that these police officers committed such a gross act of misconduct that they should themselves be imprisoned, that within a two-minute process they became … And the testimony was not neat and clean, Your Honors. It was, it really had the indicia of truthful testimony, because he, when I say he, Mr. Campbell didn't give us everything we wanted.

Oral argument — Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Hea

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 18, 2020

They're part of a broader agenda to try to get legislation, as they cited from one of the groups at a meeting, to talk about pressuring the companies to go along with the clean air agenda. … He said, just so we're clear, at the end of the day, you're going to prove a Martin Act violation or you're not. And these affirmative defenses are irrelevant to the merits of that case.

Oral argument — In re: Marriage of Geiser

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2021

This is even contrary to his website advertising, which we presented to the court as evidence for his latest company, Clean Cut Painting and have proudly grown the company. … In fact, in the DeFatta case, the court went back 10 years and was found to have acted properly.